Original source · versioned page text
Appendix C - SDAP State Code 1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road
environment
Table 1.1 Development in general
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Buildings, structures, infrastructure, services and utilities
PO1 The location of the development does not AO1.1 Development is not located in a state- Complies – The proposed development is well located
create a safety hazard for users of the state- controlled road. for its intended use as a car wash being between two
controlled road. (2) existing and adjoining service stations and fronting
AND Elm Street. The development has been considered by
Traffic Transport Plus who have prepared a Traffic
AO1.2 Development can be maintained without Impact Assessment, which confirms the proposed
requiring access to a state-controlled road. development will not create a safety hazard in this
location (refer Attachment 3).
PO2 The design and construction of the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The design and construction of the car
development does not adversely impact the wash and small food and drink outlet will not adversely
structural integrity or physical condition of the impact the structural integrity or physical condition of
state-controlled road or road transport the road given the traffic volumes are expected to be
infrastructure. less than that generated by the approved shopping
centre on the land (MCU18/0158). Further, will not
adversely impact upon road transport infrastructure
(refer Attachment 3).
PO3 The location of the development does not No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The proposed development has been
obstruct road transport infrastructure or designed for the site and will not adversely impact the
adversely impact the operating performance of existing bus stop in Elm Street. Further, will not affect
the state-controlled road. the operating performance of the state-controlled road
(refer Attachment 3).
PO4 The location, placement, design and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The proposed advertising signage for the
operation of advertising devices, visible from car wash is to be integrated within the proposed built
the state-controlled road, do not create a form and will not create a safety hazard for users of the
safety hazard for users of the state-controlled state-controlled road (refer Elevation Drawings -
road. Attachment 1)
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 1 of 17
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 16 pages
Page 2
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO5 The design and construction of buildings AO5.1 Facades of buildings and structures Complies – The design of the development including
and structures does not create a safety hazard fronting the state-controlled road are made of the built form is compatible with and in keeping with the
by distracting users of the state-controlled non-reflective materials. character of the area. The building materials used will
road. not be reflective and the development will provide for
AND hooded security lighting only. The construction of the
proposed buildings and other structures will be subject
AO5.2 Facades of buildings and structures do to a construction management plan.
not direct or reflect point light sources into the
face of oncoming traffic on the state-controlled
road.
AND
AO5.3 External lighting of buildings and
structures is not directed into the face of
oncoming traffic on the state-controlled road.
AND
AO5.4 External lighting of buildings and
structures does not involve flashing or laser
lights.
PO6 Road, pedestrian and bikeway bridges AO6.1 Road, pedestrian and bikeway bridges Not Applicable
over a state-controlled road are designed and over the state-controlled road include throw
constructed to prevent projectiles from being protection screens in accordance with section
thrown onto the state-controlled road. 4.11 of the Design Criteria for Bridges and
Other Structures Manual, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2020.
Landscaping
PO7 The location of landscaping does not AO7.1 Landscaping is not located in a state- Complies – The landscaping for the proposed
create a safety hazard for users of the state- controlled road. development is contained within the site and will not
controlled road. affect sightlines. The development proposes
AND replacement street trees in Diamond Lane following
road widening works. The development will not affect
AO7.2 Landscaping can be maintained without the safety of users of the state-controlled road (refer
requiring access to a state-controlled road. Attachment 6).
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 2 of 17
Page 3
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AND
AO7.3 Landscaping does not block or obscure
the sight lines for vehicular access to a state-
controlled road.
Stormwater and overland flow
PO8 Stormwater run-off or overland flow from No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The proposed stormwater from the
the development site does not create or development is to be managed on site in accordance
exacerbate a safety hazard for users of the with the Stormwater Management Plan and will not
state-controlled road. cause a safety hazard (refer Attachment 4).
PO9 Stormwater run-off or overland flow from No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – There is no additional stormwater runoff
the development site does not result in a as a result of the development given the nature of the
material worsening of the operating use and intended water harvesting and reuse onsite
performance of the state-controlled road or (refer Attachment 4).
road transport infrastructure.
PO10 Stormwater run-off or overland flow from No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The post-developed site will have a greatly
the development site does not adversely impact reduced overall site stormwater volume and peak flow
the structural integrity or physical condition of discharge than the pre-developed site (refer
the state-controlled road or road transport Attachment 4).
infrastructure.
PO11 Development ensures that stormwater is AO11.1 Development does not create any new Complies – The stormwater will discharge to the
lawfully discharged. points of discharge to a state-controlled road. existing underground system in Opal Street (refer
Preliminary Stormwater Layout Plan - Attachment 4).
AND
AO11.2 Development does not concentrate
flows to a state-controlled road.
AND
AO11.3 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a
lawful point of discharge.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 3 of 17
Page 4
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO11.4 Development does not worsen the
condition of an existing lawful point of
discharge to the state-controlled road.
Flooding
PO12 Development does not result in a AO12.1 For all flood events up to 1% annual Complies – The proposed development requires
material worsening of flooding impacts within a exceedance probability, development results minimal earthworks and will not result in the material
state-controlled road. in negligible impacts (within +/- 10mm) to worsening of flooding impacts (refer Earthworks Plan –
existing flood levels within a state-controlled Attachment 1).
road.
AND
AO12.2 For all flood events up to 1% annual
exceedance probability, development results
in negligible impacts (up to a 10% increase) to
existing peak velocities within a state-
controlled road.
AND
AO12.3 For all flood events up to 1% annual
exceedance probability, development results
in negligible impacts (up to a 10% increase) to
existing time of submergence of a state-
controlled road.
Drainage Infrastructure
PO13 Drainage infrastructure does not create a AO13.1 Drainage infrastructure is wholly Complies – The proposed development does not
safety hazard for users in the state-controlled contained within the development site, except require additional stormwater drainage infrastructure to
road. at the lawful point of discharge. be provided off the site and will not create a hazard for
users of the state-controlled road.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 4 of 17
Page 5
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO13.2 Drainage infrastructure can be
maintained without requiring access to a state-
controlled road.
PO14 Drainage infrastructure associated with, No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable
or within, a state-controlled road is
constructed, and designed to ensure the
structural integrity and physical condition of
existing drainage infrastructure and the
surrounding drainage network.
Table 1.2 Vehicular access, road layout and local roads
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Vehicular access to a state-controlled road or within 100 metres of a state-controlled road intersection
PO15 The location, design and operation of a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The ingress to the car wash will be
new or changed access to a state-controlled from Opal Street and egress from Diamond Lane,
road does not compromise the safety of users of which is to be widened and will not compromise
the state-controlled road. the safety of users of the state-controlled road
(refer Site Layout Plan - Attachment 1).
PO16 The location, design and operation of a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The existing access in Elm Street is
new or changed access does not adversely to be removed and reinstated removing the direct
impact the functional requirements of the state- access to a state-controlled road, which is
controlled road. beneficial for the function of the state-controlled
road.
PO17 The location, design and operation of a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The location, design and operation of
new or changed access is consistent with the the proposed development new access and
future intent of the state-controlled road. egress points is consistent with the future intent of
the state-controlled road.
PO18 New or changed access is consistent with No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies
the access for the relevant limited access road
policy:
1. LAR 1 where direct access is prohibited; or
2. LAR 2 where access may be permitted,
subject to assessment.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 5 of 17
Page 6
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO19 New or changed access to a local road No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The Traffic Impact Assessment has
within 100 metres of an intersection with a state- considered the location of the access points
controlled road does not compromise the safety relevant to the intersection with the state-
of users of the state-controlled road. controlled road and the development will not
compromise the safety of users (refer
Attachment 3).
PO20 New or changed access to a local road No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The Traffic Impact Assessment has
within 100 metres of an intersection with a state- considered the impact of the development on the
controlled road does not adversely impact on the operation of state-controlled road at the
operating performance of the intersection. intersections (refer Attachment 3).
Public passenger transport and active transport
PO21 Development does not compromise the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The proposed development will have
safety of users of public passenger transport no impact on the operation of the existing bus
infrastructure, public passenger services and stop fronting the development in Elm Street.
active transport infrastructure.
PO22 Development maintains the ability for No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies
people to access public passenger transport
infrastructure, public passenger services and
active transport infrastructure.
PO23 Development does not adversely impact the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies
operating performance of public passenger
transport infrastructure, public passenger
services and active transport infrastructure.
PO24 Development does not adversely impact No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies
the structural integrity or physical condition of
public passenger transport infrastructure and
active transport infrastructure.
Table 1.3 Network impacts
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO25 Development does not compromise the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The proposed development will not
safety of users of the state-controlled road compromise the safety of the state-controlled road
network. network.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 6 of 17
Page 7
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO26 Development ensures no net worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – Having regard to the advice of Traffic
the operating performance of the state-controlled Transport Plus the development will have less
road network. impact on the surrounding road network when
compared to the current approval for a small
shopping centre (MCU18/0158) (refer
Attachment 3).
PO27 Traffic movements are not directed onto a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – Access and egress is directed on to
state-controlled road where they can be local roads being Opal Street and Diamond Lane,
accommodated on the local road network. which is to be widened (refer Attachment 1).
PO28 Development involving haulage exceeding No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable
10,000 tonnes per year does not adversely impact
the pavement of a state-controlled road.
PO29 Development does not impede delivery of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies
planned upgrades of state-controlled roads.
PO30 Development does not impede delivery of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies
corridor improvements located entirely within
the state-controlled road corridor.
Table 1.4 Filling, excavation, building foundations and retaining structures
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO31 Development does not create a safety No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The development will not create a
hazard for users of the state-controlled road or safety hazard for users of the state-controlled
road transport infrastructure. road.
PO32 Development does not adversely impact the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The extent of earthworks on the site
operating performance of the state-controlled for the development is minimal (refer Proposed
road. Cut & Fill Plan – Attachment 1).
PO33 Development does not undermine, damage No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies
or cause subsidence of a state-controlled road.
PO34 Development does not cause ground water No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies
disturbance in a state-controlled road.
PO35 Excavation, boring, piling, blasting and fill No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The proposed earthworks will have
compaction do not adversely impact the physical no impact on the state-controlled road.
condition or structural integrity of a state-
controlled road or road transport
infrastructure.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 7 of 17
Page 8
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO36 Filling and excavation associated with the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies
construction of new or changed access do not
compromise the operation or capacity of existing
drainage infrastructure for a state-controlled
road.
Table 1.5 Environmental emissions
Statutory note: Where a state-controlled road is co-located in the same transport corridor as a railway, the development should instead comply with Environmental emissions in State code 2:
Development in a railway environment.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Reconfiguring a lot
Involving the creation of 5 or fewer new residential lots adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor
PO37 Development minimises free field noise AO37.1 Development provides a noise barrier or Not applicable
intrusion from a state-controlled road. earth mound which is designed, sited and
constructed:
1. to achieve the maximum free field acoustic
levels in reference table 2 (item 2.1);
2. in accordance with:
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020.
OR
AO37.2 Development achieves the maximum free
field acoustic levels in reference table 2 (item
2.1) by alternative noise attenuation measures
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 8 of 17
Page 9
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
where it is not practical to provide a noise barrier
or earth mound.
OR
AO37.3 Development provides a solid gap-free
fence or other solid gap-free structure along the
full extent of the boundary closest to the state-
controlled road.
Involving the creation of 6 or more new residential lots adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor
PO38 Reconfiguring a lot minimises free field AO38.1 Development provides noise barrier or Not applicable
noise intrusion from a state-controlled road. earth mound which is designed, sited and
constructed:
1. to achieve the maximum free field acoustic
levels in reference table 2 (item 2.1);
2. in accordance with:
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020.
OR
AO38.2 Development achieves the maximum free
field acoustic levels in reference table 2 (item
2.1) by alternative noise attenuation measures
where it is not practical to provide a noise barrier
or earth mound.
Material change of use (accommodation activity)
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 9 of 17
Page 10
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Ground floor level requirements adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor
PO39 Development minimises noise intrusion from AO39.1 Development provides a noise barrier or Not applicable
a state-controlled road in private open space. earth mound which is designed, sited and
constructed:
1. to achieve the maximum free field acoustic
levels in reference table 2 (item
2.2) for private open space at the ground
floor level;
2. in accordance with:
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020.
OR
AO39.2 Development achieves the maximum free
field acoustic level in reference table 2 (item
2.2) for private open space by alternative noise
attenuation measures where it is not practical to
provide a noise barrier or earth mound.
PO40 Development (excluding a relevant AO40.1 Development (excluding a relevant Not applicable
residential building or relocated residential building or relocated building)
building) minimises noise intrusion from a state- provides a noise barrier or earth mound which is
controlled road in habitable rooms at the designed, sited and constructed:
facade. 1. to achieve the maximum building façade
acoustic level in reference table 1 (item 1.1)
for habitable rooms;
2. in accordance with:
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 10 of 17
Page 11
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020.
OR
AO40.2 Development (excluding a relevant
residential building or relocated building)
achieves the maximum building façade acoustic
level in reference table 1 (item 1.1) for habitable
rooms by alternative noise attenuation
measures where it is not practical to provide a
noise barrier or earth mound.
PO41 Habitable rooms (excluding a relevant No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable
residential building or relocated building) are
designed and constructed using materials to
achieve the maximum internal acoustic level in
reference table 3 (item 3.1).
Above ground floor level requirements (accommodation activity) adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor
PO42 Balconies, podiums, and roof decks include: No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable
1. a continuous solid gap-free structure or
balustrade (excluding gaps required for
drainage purposes to comply with the Building
Code of Australia);
2. highly acoustically absorbent material
treatment for the total area of the soffit above
balconies, podiums, and roof decks.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 11 of 17
Page 12
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO43 Habitable rooms (excluding a relevant No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable
residential building or relocated building) are
designed and constructed using materials
to achieve the maximum internal acoustic level in
reference table 3 (item 3.1).
Material change of use (other uses)
Ground floor level requirements (childcare centre, educational establishment, hospital) adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal
corridor
PO44 Development: No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable
1. provides a noise barrier or earth mound that
is designed, sited and constructed:
a. to achieve the maximum free field
acoustic level in reference table 2 (item
2.3) for all outdoor education areas and
outdoor play areas;
b. in accordance with:
i. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier
design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice:
Volume 1 (Road Traffic Noise),
Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013;
ii. Technical Specification-MRTS15
Noise Fences, Transport and Main
Roads, 2019;
iii. Technical Specification-MRTS04
General Earthworks, Transport
and Main Roads, 2020; or
2. achieves the maximum free field acoustic
level in reference table 2 (item 2.3) for all
outdoor education areas and outdoor
play areas by alternative noise
attenuation measures where it is not
practical to provide a noise barrier or earth
mound.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 12 of 17
Page 13
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO45 Development involving a childcare centre No acceptable outcome is provided.
or educational establishment:
1. provides a noise barrier or earth mound that
is designed, sited and constructed:
2. to achieve the maximum building facade
acoustic level in reference table 1 (item
1.2);
3. in accordance with:
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020; or
4. achieves the maximum building facade
acoustic level in reference table 1 (item
1.2) by alternative noise attenuation
measures where it is not practical to provide
a noise barrier or earth mound.
PO46 Development involving: No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable
1. indoor education areas and indoor play
areas; or
2. sleeping rooms in a childcare centre; or
3. patient care areas in a hospital achieves the
maximum internal acoustic level in reference
table 3 (items 3.2-3.4).
Above ground floor level requirements (childcare centre, educational establishment, hospital) adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-
modal corridor
PO47 Development involving a childcare centre No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable
or educational establishment which have
balconies, podiums or elevated outdoor play
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 13 of 17
Page 14
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
areas predicted to exceed the maximum free
field acoustic level in reference table 2 (item 2.3)
due to noise from a state-controlled road are
provided with:
1. a continuous solid gap-free structure or
balustrade (excluding gaps required for
drainage purposes to comply with the Building
Code of Australia);
2. highly acoustically absorbent material
treatment for the total area of the soffit above
balconies or elevated outdoor play areas.
PO48 Development including: No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable
1. indoor education areas and indoor play
areas in a childcare centre or educational
establishment; or
2. sleeping rooms in a childcare centre; or
3. patient care areas in a hospital located
above ground level, is designed and
constructed to achieve the maximum internal
acoustic level in reference table 3 (items 3.2-
3.4).
Air, light and vibration
PO49 Private open space, outdoor education AO49.1 Each dwelling or unit has access to a Not applicable
areas and outdoor play areas are protected private open space which is shielded from a
from air quality impacts from a state-controlled state-controlled road by a building, solid gap-
road. free fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
OR
AO49.2 Each outdoor education area and
outdoor play area is shielded from a state-
controlled road by a building, solid gap-free
fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 14 of 17
Page 15
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO50 Patient care areas within hospitals are AO50.1 Hospitals are designed and constructed
protected from vibration impacts from a state- to ensure vibration in the patient treatment area
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor. does not exceed a vibration dose value of
0.1m/s1.75.
AND
AO50.2 Hospitals are designed and constructed
to ensure vibration in the ward of a patient care
area does not exceed a vibration dose value of
0.4m/s1.75.
PO51 Development is designed and sited to No acceptable outcomes are prescribed. Not applicable
ensure light from infrastructure within, and from
users of, a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-
modal corridor, does not:
1. intrude into buildings during night hours (10pm
to 6am);
2. create unreasonable disturbance during
evening hours (6pm to 10pm).
Table 1.6: Development in a future state-controlled road environment
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO52 Development does not impede delivery of a AO52.1 Development is not located in a future Not applicable
future state-controlled road. state-controlled road.
OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING APPLY:
AO52.2 Development does not involve filling and
excavation of, or material changes to, a future
state-controlled road.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 15 of 17
Page 16
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO52.3 The intensification of lots does not occur
within a future state-controlled road.
AND
AO52.4 Development does not result in the
landlocking of parcels once a future state-
controlled road is delivered.
PO53 The location and design of new or AO53.1 Development does not include new or Not applicable
changed access does not create a safety hazard changed access to a future state-controlled
for users of a future state-controlled road. road.
PO54 Filling, excavation, building foundations and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable
retaining structures do not undermine, damage
or cause subsidence of a future state-controlled
road.
PO55 Development does not result in a material No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable
worsening of stormwater, flooding, overland flow
or drainage impacts in a future state-controlled
road or road transport infrastructure.
PO56 Development ensures that stormwater is AO56.1 Development does not create any new Not applicable
lawfully discharged. points of discharge to a future state-controlled
road.
AND
AO56.2 Development does not concentrate flows
to a future state-controlled road.
AND
AO56.3 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a
lawful point of discharge.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 16 of 17
Page 17
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO56.4 Development does not worsen the
condition of an existing lawful point of discharge
to the future state-controlled road.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 17 of 17