Original source · versioned page text
Appendix C - SDAP State Code 1
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO36 Filling and excavation associated with the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies
construction of new or changed access do not
compromise the operation or capacity of existing
drainage infrastructure for a state-controlled
road.
Table 1.5 Environmental emissions
Statutory note: Where a state-controlled road is co-located in the same transport corridor as a railway, the development should instead comply with Environmental emissions in State code 2:
Development in a railway environment.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Reconfiguring a lot
Involving the creation of 5 or fewer new residential lots adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor
PO37 Development minimises free field noise AO37.1 Development provides a noise barrier or Not applicable
intrusion from a state-controlled road. earth mound which is designed, sited and
constructed:
1. to achieve the maximum free field acoustic
levels in reference table 2 (item 2.1);
2. in accordance with:
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020.
OR
AO37.2 Development achieves the maximum free
field acoustic levels in reference table 2 (item
2.1) by alternative noise attenuation measures
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 8 of 17
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.