Original source · versioned page text
2019-09-16 General Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 16 SEPTEMBER 2019
Page 17 of 30
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 16 SEPTEMBER 2019
PBCAI submits that there is a considerable difference between the short-term visitor
accommodation provided in a Motel and that provided by the dwellings which have
been approved for this development.
Firstly, the Motel units are one and two bedroom units. The dwellings are 3 and 4
bedroom dwellings and some are even being advertised as 5 bedroom dwellings.
Secondly, the price for a Motel unit would vary considerably from that for one of
these 3, 4 and 5 bedroom dwellings. The dwellings are advertised for sale from
$750,000 to $1,025,000. (Kamala from $750,000, Marram from $750,000, Wallum
from $915,000, Lily from $925,000 and Saltbush from $1,025,000) which would
suggest investors may require a rate of return much higher than a Motel unit price.
Thirdly, Motel units are available by the night whereas 3, 4 and 5 bedroom dwellings
usually have a minimum number of nights, frequently exceeding 7. They frequently
require payment in advance and also payment of a security deposit.
THE CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS
The so called “Construction Impacts” of the dwellings on the operation of the Motel, if
completed in Stage 1, have not changed since Thomco agreed to the Motel being
given priority in mid 2017. Giving the Motel priority removed one reason for the
rejection of Thomco’s development application, as it gave certainty to the provision
of short-term visitor accommodation.
Thomco obviously did not want to raise any significance of the construction impacts
while it sought to have the rejection of its development application overturned by the
appeal.
Thomco was prepared to settle the appeal as recently as 21 June 2019 without any
reference to these newly raised “Construction Impacts’.
NOT A MINOR CHANGE UNDER SECTION 78
PBCAI submits that this approval requires Thomco to build the Motel with priority
(Stage 1) because of Council’s and the community's need for the short-term visitor
accommodation provided by a Motel.
For Thomco to propose to vary this recent approval to firstly build the 20 by 3, 4 and
5 bedroom dwellings is a considerable change, not a “minor change’, from what was
approved.
PBCAI submits that the proposal to build the 20 by 3, 4 and 5 bedroom dwellings
first, without any guarantee that the short-term visitor accommodation provided by
the Motel will be built requires public notification. Without the Motel, and the short-
term visitor accommodation this is a substantially different development. It is almost
the small lot housing development Thomco initially sought.
For Thomco to propose to build the 20 by 3, 4 and 5 bedroom dwellings first, without
providing any guarantee that it intends to build the Motel is disingenuous when it is
3
Page 17 of 30See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.