Original source · versioned page text
2018-09-11 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (18.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 11 SEPTEMBER 2018
Page 68 of 95
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 11 SEPTEMBER 2018
POLICY GUIDELINE — Conservation Land
4) Land for Wildlife
The LfW Program offers an alternative for landholders whose properties do not qualify for the VCA
Program or for landholders that do not want a statutory covenant on their land. The LFW Program
provides a support network for landholders interested in conserving their land and adds to Noosa’s
social capital of people involved in private land conservation. Based on popularity and area of land
cover the LFW program is Noosa’s leading private land conservation initiative.
Land for Wildlife offers a lower level of conservation protection than public ownership or private
Nature Refuge, however, like many other rural properties that are vegetated, LfW properties are
protected (or partly protected) under the under the Noosa Plan Biodiversity and Riparian Overlays.
Applications for LfW are considered on a case by case basis and suitable land includes:
e Land parcels identified in the mapping methodology
° Land in biodiversity corridors
e Land outside biodiversity corridors that meets LfW criteria id in supporting guidelines.
A Private Landholder Conservation Partnerships Guideline h veloped to implement the
LfW program.
Conservation tenure and levels of protection
In terms of safeguarding biodiversity, public owne Is considered mor re than private
ownership. It is not possible to determine the abse isk to biodiversity of eac ervation land
mechanism as it is subject to the intent of thé fanadholder ardiess of sta protection
provisions). Figure 1 below shows the various consé@tWation p on tenures, levels of protection
and the scale of investment required.
Common land conservation tenures
Public ownership (acquisition)
1. National Park ,
Highest YR OSE oa 4 Highest
ee NV aaa
4. Council freehold Nature refuge
protection y a cinnl-al 4
Level of
Private ownership
we 5. Freehold Nature Refuge (VCA or Revolving fund)
6. Freehold with vegetation covenant (VCA)
7. Freehold protected under Noosa Plan Biodiversity ee
Overlay (LfW)
8. Landholder goodwill (all tenures)
Figure 1. Common land conservation measures and level of protection
Decision support tool
Landholders may choose to voluntary sell to Council for conservation purposes or elect to be part
of a private landholder conservation partnerships program. Figure 2 is a decision support tool for
helping to determine the preferred conservation mechanism for landholders interested in protecting
their land through one of the conservation mechanisms.
Page 4
Page 68 of 95See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.