Council archive · source document
MCU15/0095 Air Quality Assessment
Table 3.3: Literature Emission Rates for Service Stations
NPI 1999 LORAX Reports
Emission Sources Lbs / 1000 gallons
Mg / litre throughput
throughput
Underground Tank Filling
Submerged Filling 880 8.4
Splash Filling 1380 -
Submerged Filling with vapour
40 0.42
balance
Underground tank breathing
120 0.84
losses
Vehicle Refuelling
Displacement Losses (uncontrolled) 1320 8.4
Displacement Losses (controlled) 132 0.74
Spillages
Uncontrolled 80 0.61
Controlled - 0.41
“Whoosh” Emissions - 0.26 – 0.66
All volume sources (refuelling, spillages and whoosh emissions) have been modelled based on the
analysis of wake effects presented in the LORAX report (Toxics Committee of the California Air
Pollution Control Officers Association 1997). Point sources (breathing) have been modelled in
accordance with the NPI data.
3.4.3 Fuel Throughput
Brisbane City Council recommends two methods of calculating the fuel dispensing throughput for a
service station:
⚫ Method 1 – If site data is available for total daily or weekly fuel sales:
⚫ Estimate daily petrol dispensing rate (preferably the peak rate not average)
⚫ Use the daily profile presented in Table 3.4 to apportion the amount of fuel dispensed
per hour
Page 14 of 30
Synergy Property Partners Pty Ltd- Air Quality Assessment - Proposed Service Station, 123 Eumundi-Noosa Road, Noosaville
/Network/Projects/4484/Reporting/4484 Report02.odt
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU15/0095 Air Quality Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.1 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.