Minor Change Existing Approval - 132008 176 07 (As Published) · 132008.176.07

                                       Page 21 of 31
Document Set ID: 24809674
Version: 9, Version Date: 27/05/2026


[OCR of page images]
Document Set ID: 24809674

(2502-44623 SPD

Attachment 1—Reasons for responsible entity decision

 

(Given under section 83(9) of the Planning Act 2016)

The reasons for SARA's decision are:
« The development was assessed as being minor in accordance with the Planning Act 2016 and the
Development Assessment Rules.

« SARA assessed the development against the following codes of the State Development Assessment
Provisions (SDAP), version 3.0:
0 State code 6: Protection of state transport networks (State code 6)
0 State code 25: Development in South East Queensland koala habitat areas (State code 25).

« The development complies with the assessment benchmarks of State code 6 of SDAP in that the
development:
© protects state transport infrastructure, public passenger transport infrastructure, active
transport infrastructure and public passenger services from the adverse impacts of
development;
© maintains the operating performance of the transport network;
ensures development enables safe and convenient access to public passenger transport;
© does not create a safety hazard for users of state transport infrastructure or public passenger
services by increasing the likelihood or frequency of a fatality or serious injury:
0 does not result in worsening of the physical condition or operating performance of the state
transport network:
© provides public passenger transport infrastructure to enable development to be services by
public passenger transport;
0 provides safe and direct access to public passenger transport infrastructure or active
transport infrastructure, including access by cycling and walking.

* The development complies with the assessment benchmarks of State code 25 of SDAP in that the
development:
0 does not cause an unacceptable impact on mapped koala habitat areas;
0 is designed and located to avoid impacts or, where the matters of state environmental
Significance cannot be reasonably avoided, impacts are reasonably minimised and mitigated;
© results in a significant residual impact that is acceptable, and an offset is provided.

Material used in the assessment of the change application:
the development application material and submitted plans
Planning Act 2016

Planning Regulation 2017

the SDAP (version 3.0), as published by SARA

the Development Assessment Rules

SARA DA Mapping system

section 58 of the Human Rights Act 2019.

State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 4 of 13

Version: 9, Version Date: 27/05/2026

Page 21 of 31