PM Submission Object - Heather Burton - MCU18/0019

Fee

u HEN RCCON OI DoyNeti¢e of Submission

7 |

ps &
Unter |

Cy
To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that: | . Jj

be made to the assessment manager tigee. a /
be in writing Paves. iaseeat |

be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronically Sa ay
state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission

- State what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why

_8._be received by Council during the formal public notification period = Mors

As required by the Planning Act 2016, all submissions, including individual details, are published on Council's website

and therefore will be accessible to internet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whether or not
they are properly made.

1. Application details
File No. MCU18 / 0019
Postal address of Land (as advertised) 52-62 Goodchap Street & 3-11 Val Crescent Noosaville

Nature of Proposed Development - Housing Type 3 Retirement and Special Needs (Ag ed Care Fa

ARON =

  
  
 

     
   
 
   

   
 

2. Submitter details
Fullname of Submitter Heather Durtin
|Postal address =f Dilazwer Dlacoe

| Suburb Tecsurtin

Signature(s)

    
   

   

    
 

3. Details of Submission
| (We), make the following submission: —

| 1. | object to the proposed development because it will impact on the amenity of the surrounding neighbourhood which is
Zoned Detached housing. The size and bulk of the proposed development (which is basically one continuous bullding
‘taking up 11 lots) will look totally out of place on the site which is surrounded by modest residential houses.

2. The residential character of the area will be substantially diminished in nature as a result of the development.

3. This site is currently zoned Detached Housing. Having a 90 bed aged care facility on this site is in direct conflict with
the Noosa Plan. The Noosa Plan was drafted based on extensive community consultation. The community expects that
the Council adheres to the Plan and does not allow development which blatantly contravenes it, such as the proposed
development. Development that would be consistent with the planning scheme would be 11 dwellings over the 11 lots,
which is very different to a 90 bed aged care facility, which is commercial in nature.

4. A 90 bed aged care facility is excessive aid is an overdevelopment of the site.

 
 

 

§.1 understand that the Sunshine Coast will need more aged care facilities in the future, however, they should be located
in more appropriately zoned areas. Val Crescent is not an appropriate site for such a development.

6. The section of Goodchap Street near the hospital and Val Crescent are already under a lot of strain in terms of car
parking, with them being used as an overflow car park for hospital staff, patients and visitors. A 90 bed facility directly
across the road from the hospital which has up to 35 staff, visitors and commercial vehicles will exacerbate this problem
with more and more people parking on Goodchap St, Val Crescent and nearby side streets.

WOXI3115-- Rs <p gy

 

Privacy j :
Council will use any personal information provided for the intended purpose only and for remaining in cdntact with you. Council is authorised to collect
this information in accordance with the Local Goverment Act 2009 and other Local Government Acts. ation is only accessed by

persons authorised to do so, Your personal information is dealt with in accordance with council's Privacy policy.

www.noosa.ald.gov.au [email protected] T 07 5329 6500
PO Box 141 Tewantin Qid 4565 ABN 97 969 214 121

 

Page 1 of 1