Original source · versioned page text
Technical Note in response to action notice
Ref No 20648-R1 – Rev 2 TECHNICAL NOTE IN RESPONSE TO COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT COMPLIANCE NOTICE FOR NEW DWELLING AT 22 TURPENTINE ROAD RINGTAIL CREEK I refer to Council’s letter dated 9th November 2020, reference COM20/0693 regarding outstanding development conditions for the second dwelling at the above address. The two issues raised in this letter relate to stormwater/flooding conditions and the construction of a second driveway. The purpose of this technical note is to address these matters to the satisfaction of Council. BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS On 2 February 2018 Council issued a Referral Agency Response ref RAL17/0523 approving a Development Application for Building Works – Detached House (secondary dwelling) at 22 Turpentine Road, Ringtail Creek (lot 2 RP846208). Condition 8 & 9 of RAL17/0523 read as follows: 8. The minimum floor levels of all habitable rooms must be the greater of the following: a. The minimum specified floor level if in an area where minimum floor levels are available b. 300mm above the modelled flood level if in an area where flood modelling is available c. 300mm above the highest known flood level if in an area where flood modelling is not available 9. The development of the site (buildings, driveways, paths and landscaping) must not impede the existing overland flow of stormwater from the adjoining property or cause additional ponding on stormwater on any adjoining properties or the road reserve. There is no mention in the conditions about the driveway requirements however the approved plans show the secondary dwelling being accessed via an extension to the driveway from the existing/main dwelling. OVERLAND FLOW PATHS/STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The subject lot is not located within a flood hazard zone and as such there is no minimum specified floor level. Refer screen shot from Council flood hazard mapping below. We are unaware as to whether there has been any flood modelling in this specific location but suspect none exists. There is also no historical flood level to determine the highest known flood. Notwithstanding the image below shows that the flood hazard area extends to areas below RL 3.5-3.8 AHD (approx.) Page 1 of 8
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.