001AA83A.001

.                             .                                          . .                   ,     .                     ,     +

                  ‘INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997                                                                             ,            '   {DAS Assessment Checklist, Version 22
                 _ | #ENVIRONMENTALLY RELEVANT: ACTIVITY: WILD RIVER:AREA (continued) Shs “>                          RP      ORSN" BGK      aay) Gx Ce
                           po                    Itno, is any ERA an extraction ERA intended to be located outside waters?                                                    -               '
                                                 O No — Unless the appcation fs consistent with any property development plan applying to the land, and the appication is accompanied by
                                                :          an aliocation notice, the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it, (Complete Form 1, Part G). This application requires
      .                                                    assessinent by the Administering Authority for the purposes of both the Environmental Protection Act 1994 and the Wild Rivers Act :
 .            .                                            2005. if the Administering Authority is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction es Concurrence
                              .                  ‘         Agency.                                              :                                                    :              ,
                 .                        |      (les                      |                   .                                                                             .
          oo                                         Ifyes, does the ERA meet the following?
                                                     (i)  the activity is located inside a flood management area and a borrow pit of not                   [}No}(C] Yes
                             ;                            more than'10,000m3for-                                               .
                                                 °        *    specified-works under the-Wild Rivers Act 2005; or          .  ~
                 4         oo                                  residential complexes, as defined under the Environmental Protection Act 1994
                                                 ’  |{ii) the activity is located outside a flood management area                                          JNo
   ,  .                            ’                if yes to elther (i) or (ii) above - Unless the application is consistent with any property development plan applying fo the land, and ;
           u                    .                              the application is accompanied by an allocation notice, the Assessment Manager must refuse to recelve it. (Complete Form 1, | |
                                     ,        :                Part G). This application requires assessment by the Administering Authority for the purposes of both the Environmental
                                                 .             Protection Act 1994 and, subject to the declaration for the retevant wild river area, the Wild Rivers Act 2005. If the Administering .
                 .                                    .        Authority is not the Assessment Manager for the epplication, the agency hes jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.
                                                    ‘tno to both (i} and (i). above - An appiication for the ERA will be taken to be not properly made and the Assessment manager must |.
                                 .        ;        oO                                 ‘refuse (o receive it.                                                   :
      us                   IPA schedule 8, part 1, tahie 2, tem 1; IPA, schedule 8, pad 1, tabla 5, dems 2 and 4; IP Regulation. schedwe 2, table 2. itams 1 and 23. Envronmental Protection Act 1994. section 7344 (wig
                           fiver arpa); Wild Rivess Act 2005, cacton 43A: ralavant vad fiver dadlaraliad Wid Rivers Code. :
                  _WITHIN:THE LIMITS. OF 8, PORT 3a:           0 a0  3 22 SP     Sena        eh     eaeemM    LES feo     OR CO URES EIN I a OY ETO
                           Is Any part of the premises within the limits of a port under the Transport infrastructure Act 1994?                -     oe
  ,         so             Y7]No-Gotoars        [] Yes                                            ,            :                             St
                               or, is that part of the premises below high watermark?            >                or,                                             .     >.          .        ;
                                   No    °                                    ;                                                      ,                               :
                               (J Yes - if answers to questions in other sections of this checkiist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule   }-
an                                        8 - Answer (a) to (¢) below. This application requires assessment by the Port Authority forthe land. If you answer no fo (a), (b) and
              :                           (c} below, the Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Advice Agency.     ;        :
                                       (a)  “Is any part of the proposd: within 200m of a shipping channel or an entry and exit shipping corridor for the Port?                          .
                 .                         ~CJNo        -     Ol YeS — The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction es Concurrence Agency.    :       mo                    .
                |          .     . __ (b) Is any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a swing basin, a commercial fishing wharf, a mooring, anchorage or spoil grounds?
                                             LJ No             [C1 Yes - the Post Authority for the Port has jurisdiction es Concurrence Agency.                       ,
    :                                  (c)   Js any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a planned port facility identified in a land use plan?                                         .
                                             LJNo              CJ Yes - the Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.              ,         .     |.
                          IP Regulation, schade 2 table 2 igras 15 and 16.                                  .                      .
             --LDECEAREDAEISHHABITATAREA cs                               ce. re cn                 eR ee EN ene nen aa                                                   ar
                          Dogs any part of the premises adjoin a declared fish habitat area under the Fisheries Act 19947                                         a
                          tv] No - Goto 01.6                                ‘                                                               ,
.                         C1 Yes - ifanswers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule 8,
    os                             _ this application requires assessment by the Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries (DPI&F). If DPI&F is not the Assessment
                                    Manager for the application, the agency has Jurisdiction as Advice Agency.                      .              ,        :
                          IP Regulation. scfenkie 2, tatte 2 Hon 26.                                                ‘.

    t              .                  .                                                          .                               .                                      .

                                                                                         Page 4            /