Council archive · source document
Approved Plans & Report - 51987.3004.01
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 1, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL
APPROVED PLAN
51987.3004.01 7 MAR 2023
[OCR of page images]
Plants
Job 6 Park Rd Noosa Heads
400 Ltr Total
Backhousia citriodora Bac cit 1
Randia fitzalanii Ran fiT 12
100 Ltr Total
Acronychia imperforate Acrimp 3
Alectryon coriaceus Ale cor 5
Backhousia anisate Baeani 3
Backhousia myrtifolia Bacmyr 3
Backhousia citriodora Bac cit 6
Cyathea cooperii Cyacoo 9
Elaeocarpus reticulatus Ela ret 6
Licuala ramsayi Lic ram 22
300 mm Total
Cordyline stricta Cor str 12
Cordyline rubra Cor rub 6
Doryanthes excelsa Dor exc 25
Hovea longifolia Hov lon 6
Heliconia Hot Summer Night Hel HSN 31
200mm Total
Austromytus dulcis Aus dul 76
Alpinia caerulea Alp cae 18
Viola hederacea Vio hed 50
Clivia Cli 15
Crinum pedunculatum Cri ped 16
LANDSCAPING SPECIFICATION
EXTENT OF LANDSCAPING WORK
. SUPPLY AND INSTALL AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM
. POISON AND REMOVE FROM SITE ALL WEEDS
. EXCAVATION AND DRAINAGE OF ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED
. SUPPLY AND INSTALLING OF ENRICHED TOPSOIL
. SUPPLY AND INSTALL ALL PLANTS AS SPECIFIED
. SUPPLY AND INSTALL BARK MULCH
. MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPE FOR 90 DAYS FROM COMPLETION
8 SEDIMENT CONTROL
9.QUALIFIED SUPERVISION
10. FIRE ANT PREVENTION
1.AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM
DESIGN, SUPPLY AND INSTALL A COMPLETE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE RELEVANT AUTHORITIES.
THE SYSTEM WILL BE INSTALLED BY A SUITABLY QUALIFIED PERSON AND WILL
COVER ALL GARDEN AREAS. THE CONTROLLER WILL BE PLACED IN A SECURE
AREA WITHIN THE COMPLEX AND VALVES WILL BE INCONSPICUOUSLY INSTALLED
WITHIN THE PLANTING AREAS.
2.POISON AND REMOVE FROM SITE ALL WEEDS
POISON ALL WEEDS AND FOREIGN GRASSES USING ENVIRONMENTALLY
ACCEPTABLE METHODS SUCH AS GLYPHOSATE HERBICIDE. REMOVE OFF SITE
RUBBISH AND WEEDS FROM THE PLANTING AREAS.
3.EXCAVATION & DRAINAGE OF ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED
EXCAVATE AREA TO BE PLANTED REMOVING ALL BUILDING MATERIALS AND CLODS.
REMOVE MATERIAL TO A DEPTH OF 200mm AND BREAK UP SUB GRADE A FURTHER
100mm ENSURING DRAINAGE |S SUFFICIENT. RIP THIS SUB GRADE PARALLEL TO
THE FINAL CONTOURS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. DO NOT RIP WITHIN THE DRIP LINE
OF EXISTING TREES TO BE RETAINED. ALLOW GRAVEL DRAINS TO STORM WATER
AS REQUIRED.
4.SUPPLY AND INSTALLING OF ENRICHED TOPSOIL
SUPPLY A PREMIUM GRADE ORGANIC ENRICHED LANDSCAPE BLEND. INSTALL
ORGANIC ADDITIVES AND A LOW RELEASE FERTILIZER TO MEET THE RELEVANT
TEST CRITERIA AND AS4419. PROGRESSIVELY FILL THE PLANTER AREAS AND
LIGHTLY COMPACT. MOUND THE FINISHED LEVEL TO IMPROVE DRAINAGE
NOORON>
PLANTS AS SPECIFIED
REFER TO PLANTING PLAN
TREE SUPPORT
PROVIDE HESSIAN
STRAPS AS SHOWN FOR
TREE SUPPORT
MULCH
100mm THICK SPECIFIED
MULCH TYPE. MULCH TO BE
CLEAR OF BASE OF PLANT
00
joo, 200 400)
5.SUPPLY AND INSTALL ALL PLANTS AS SPECIFIED
ALL PLANT MATERIAL SUPPLIED TO THE PROJECT WILL MEET AUSTRALIAN
STANDARDS AS2303. AND WILL BE FRESH, VIGOROUS FREE OF DISEASE AND PESTS.
THE PLANTS WILL BE ESTABLISHED, SUN HARDENED, OF GOOD FORM AND CONSISTENT
OF THE SPECIES. ROOT SYSTEMS SHOULD BE LARGE, HEALTHY, FREE FROM ROOT
CIRCLING. APPROVAL OF THE PLANTS WILL BE GIVEN BY THE CLIENT PRIOR TO
PLANTING
IF ALL REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. INSTALLATION OF THE PLANT STOCK WILL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH GOOD NURSERY PRACTICES WITH LARGER PLANTS BEING
INSTALLED
WITH STAKES AS PER THE ATTACHED DETAIL. SMALLER PLANTS CAN BE STAKED AS
REQUIRED
.6.SUPPLY AND INSTALL BARK MULCH
BARK MULCH IS TO BE COMPOSTED FOREST MULCH SPREAD OVER THE PLANTING
AREAS 100mm THICK. CARE IS TO BE TAKEN NOT TO PLACE BARK THICKLY ON
THE STEMS OF THE PLANTS.
7.MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPE
MAINTAIN THE COMPLETE LANDSCAPE WORKS FOR 90 DAYS FROM
COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. KEEP DIARY NOTES REGARDING SITE VISITS
AND OBSERVATIONS
8.SEDIMENT CONTROL
AT ALL TIMES DURING THE WORKS SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MUST
BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL AUTHORITY REQUIREMENTS
9.QUALIFIED SUPERVISION
THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION MUST BE SUPERVISED BY A SUITABLY QUALIFIED
AND EXPERIENCED LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT (IN THE FIELDS OF LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE / LANDSCAPE DESIGN / HORTICULTURE). THE SUPERVISING
LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT MUST ENSURE THAT THE WORKS HAVE BEEN INSPECTED
AND CONFIRM ACCEPTABILITY AT THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
10.FIRE ANT PREVENTION
ALL NECESSARY MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO PREVENT FIRE ANTS ENTERING THE
WORK SITE.
11. LAWN
ALL LAWN SUPPLIED AND LAID IS TO BE A GRADE EMPIRE ZOYSIA.
ADVANCED CONTAINER
PLANT STOCK REFER TO
PLANT SCHEDULE AND
SPEC. AN ADVANCED
CONTAINER PLANT SHALL
BE PLANT STOCK IN
CONTAINER SIZES OF 25 Itr
RANGING TO 200 Itr
STREET TREES
TREATED HARDWOOD
- SCALE -1:
SS » 4 Sy g S 1.5mx1.5m
wore cxrs |
(__ Planting Detail are pon assecres
26 TYPICAL NATURAL GROUND TYPICAL ADVANCED TREE
PLANTING DETAIL PLANTING DETAIL
Arborculture & Horticulture Consulting
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL
APPROVED PLAN
51987.3004.01 7 MAR 2023
Plant Procurement
Landscape Design
P.O. Box 7725
Sippy Downs Q 4556
110 Winston Road
Palmwoods Q
Mobile: 0403 477 060
Email: [email protected]
David Hawthorne PROJECT INFORMATION
Consulting Arborist AQF Level 5 Title: Landscape Plan Site: 6 PARK RD
& =, 1 Dip Arb AHC50510 Client: NOOSA HEADS
Arbor A Live Dip Hort RTF50103 MQAA / Date: _JAN 2023 Plan No_04
F en ISA QTRA Issue: A David Hawthorne Scale: 1:150 @A3
AIH-RH150 Designed: Arborist Signed: rc
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 20 sections
Section 2
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL
APPROVED PLAN
51987.3004.01 7 MAR 2023
[OCR of page images]
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL
APPROVED PLAN
51987.3004.01 7 MAR 2023
/—- PLAN
3 HEL HSN
3 BAE ANI
~s
Ton
5 LIC RAM
3 LIC RAM
i
|
7S LARET ~
16\CRI PED
| ae 3 ELA RET. _3 ACR IMP,
3BAC MYR) 3LIC RAM
| Se)
—— | | \
a ALP CAE
12 RAN EIT 5 LIC RAM SHELHSN | |
| 1 6 COR STR
t— 6 COR RUB eI
[TB ~f |
| | | tI 3CORSTR
__ re |_| 3 COR STR
© te ey
° ~ 25 DORE
4 BAC CIT
10 HE 26 AUS DUL
\_
LU
= !
| |
: J
Tp :
pC
E
Plant Procurement
Arborculture & Horticulture Consulting
David Hawthorne
Consulting Arborist AQF Level 5
PROJECT INFORMATION
Title: Landscape Plan
Site: 6 PARK RD
Landscape Design
.0. . ient: NOOSA HEADS
(J Seale -1 425 setters as Se DipArb AHCSOSIO ||| [Sto
110 Winston Road ° ip ort QAA : PlanNo: (4
Palmwoods Q be mr Acliv 7 ,
Mobile: 0403 477 060 Far ticuleural desteni@ con: o ISA QTRA sssuei A - David Hawthorne | Sa! 1 @As
Email: [email protected] AlH-RH1 50 Designed: Arborist Signed: Le
Section 3
Tree Management Report
Client: R 2 R Building Services
Site: 6 Park Rd
Noosa Heads
Date: 14th September 2022
Assessed by: David Hawthorne Dip Arb AHC50510
Consulting Arborist AQF5 Dip Hort/Arb RTF50203
Dip Hort RTF50103
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL MQAA / ISA QTRA
APPROVED DOCUMENT RH0150 AIH
51987.3004.01 7 MAR 2023
Section 4
Brief:
• Identify trees impacted by the proposed construction of replacement retaining walls.
• Determine Tree Protection Zones of these trees using the Australian standards 4970-
2009, Protection of trees on development sites
• Recommend any treatments or ongoing monitoring or maintenance.
Methods and Procedures:
• Discussions on site with Josh De Wit to determine the extent of works and
methodology.
• Visual inspection of the standing stock at ground level and light probe investigation of
the root plate of the trees to determine the extent and health of sub-canopy structures.
• No scientific analysis was conducted during the preparation of this report.
• Australian standards 4970-2009, Protection of trees on development sites, AS 4373-
2007 pruning of amenity trees and AS2870-2011 have been referenced to prepare this
report.
• International Society of Arboriculture Tree Risk Assessment Manual was used to
provide recommendations in this report
• The weather on the day of the inspection was fine, low wind and a warm temperature
Summary
• This site located at Noosa Heads is a residential dwelling. This dwelling has been
constructed on a steep embankment in an area classed as high slip risk.
• As this site is classed as a high slip risk area it is essential to maintain the integrity of
the existing retain walls to manage water runoff and for erosion control.
• During the inspection it was determined that all existing sleeper style retaining walls
have failed from the effects of tree trunk expansion, root ingress and rotting of the
sleeper wall material. These walls need to be replaced to ensure the stability of the
site, protect the foundations of the existing dwelling, mitigate the effects of water
runoff and for erosion control.
• The influence of roots from the mature trees on site will be causing soil moisture
suction (migration of moisture towards the trees.) this abnormal moisture condition at
the foundations of the dwelling and retaining walls cause shrinkage and subsidence.
• The Australian Standard AS2870-2011 recommends large growing trees and tree
groups should be grown at least one and a half times their mature height from
foundations. All trees listed have portions of the existing dwelling within their
Structural Root Zones.
• Trees appear to be in poor to average condition with some demonstrating issues
arising from poor prior pruning practices. This prior pruning does not meet the
Australian Standards and has created epicormic regrowth and branch defects which
have rendered these trees as unstable.
• All proposed works to reconstruct the retaining walls, falls well within the Structural
Root Zones and Tree Protection Zones of the trees per the Australian standards 4970-
2009, Protection of trees on development sites.
• It is impossible to gain access or clearance zones away from the trees to carry out the
essential reconstruction works which will render the trees as not viable.
• The only way to sufficiently mitigate these effects to protect the foundations of the
existing dwelling and new retaining walls is to remove these trees.
• I recommend the removal of these trees.
Section 5
Site Plan [OCR of page images] Site Plan 4 AS 4970—2009 one tior prote ree
Section 6
Tree 1
Cupaniopsis anacardioides 7m x 6m Cal .330m
Tree Protection Zone 3.96m Radius
Structural Root Zone 2.08m Radius
Description:
• This tree is not suitable for this confined environment as it is a large tree to 15 meters.
• Tree health is considered poor. The trunk has developed through the face of the
existing retaining wall and the tree lists heavily over the existing dwelling.
• The proposed retaining wall replacement work is within the SRZ of the trees as set
out in the Australian standards 4970-2009, Protection of trees on development sites,
which will render the trees unviable.
Recommendations:
• I recommend to remove this tree and replace with more appropriate species.
Section 7
Tree 2
Syzygium cormiflorum 8m x 4m Cal .200m .200m
Tree Protection Zone 3.96m Radius
Structural Root Zone 2.08m Radius
Description:
• This tree is not suitable for this confined environment as it is a large tree to 15 meters.
• Tree health is considered average and the tree lists over the existing dwelling.
• The proposed retaining wall replacement work is within the SRZ of the trees as set
out in the Australian standards 4970-2009, Protection of trees on development sites,
which will render the trees unviable.
Recommendations:
• I recommend to remove this tree and replace with more appropriate species.
Section 8
Tree 3
Aleurites rockinghamensis 10m x 10m Cal .330m
Tree Protection Zone 3.96m Radius
Structural Root Zone 2.08m Radius
Description:
• This tree is not suitable for this confined environment as it is a large tree to 15 meters.
• Tree health is considered average and the tree lists over the existing dwelling.
• The proposed retaining wall replacement work is within the SRZ of the trees as set
out in the Australian standards 4970-2009, Protection of trees on development sites,
which will render the trees unviable.
Recommendations:
• I recommend to remove this tree and replace with more appropriate species.
Section 9
Tree 4
Acacia sp 6m x 3m Cal .200m
Description:
• This tree is dead and listing heavily over the existing dwelling
Recommendations:
• I recommend to remove this tree
Section 10
Tree 5
Corymbia intermedia 8m x 5m Cal .350m
Tree Protection Zone 4m Radius
Structural Root Zone 2.10m Radius
Description:
• This tree is not suitable for this confined environment as it is a large tree to 15 meters.
• Tree health is considered average and the tree lists heavily over the existing dwelling.
• The proposed retaining wall replacement work is within the SRZ of the trees as set
out in the Australian standards 4970-2009, Protection of trees on development sites,
which will render the trees unviable.
Recommendations:
• I recommend to remove this tree and replace with more appropriate species.
Section 11
Tree 6
Acacia sp 6m x 4m Cal .400m
Description:
• This tree is dead and lists towards the existing dwelling and is supported by the
adjoining Corymbia.
Recommendations:
• I recommend to remove this tree
Section 12
Tree 7
Dypsis lutescens 5m x 4m Cal .100m
Tree Protection Zone 1.5m Radius
Structural Root Zone 1 m Radius
Description:
• This palm is not suitable for this confined environment.
• Plant health is considered poor, and it is growing in a heavy shaded area.
• The proposed retaining wall replacement work is within the SRZ of the plant as set
out in the Australian standards 4970-2009, Protection of trees on development sites,
which will render the plant unviable.
Recommendations:
• I recommend to remove this tree and replace with more appropriate species.
Section 13
Trees 8 & 9
Syzygium cormiflorum 8m x 4m Cal .350m
Tree Protection Zone 4m Radius
Structural Root Zone 2.10m Radius
Description:
• These trees are not suitable for this confined environment as they are a large tree to 15
meters.
• Tree health is considered poor. Poor prior pruning practices, which do not meet the
Australian Standards, have created epicormic regrowth and branch defects which have
rendered these trees as unstable.
• The proposed retaining wall replacement work is within the SRZ of the trees as set
out in the Australian standards 4970-2009, Protection of trees on development sites,
which will render the trees unviable.
Recommendations:
• I recommend to remove these trees and replace with more appropriate species.
Section 14
Trees 10 to 20
Syzygium erythrocalyx 5m x 2m Cal .200m
Tree Protection Zone 2.4m Radius
Structural Root Zone 1.68 m Radius
Description:
• These trees have been grown as a hedge and are not suitable for this confined
environment as they are a large tree to 10 meters.
• Tree health is considered poor. Poor prior pruning practices, which do not meet the
Australian Standards, have created epicormic regrowth and branch defects which have
rendered these trees as unstable.
• The proposed retaining wall replacement work is within the SRZ of the trees as set
out in the Australian standards 4970-2009, Protection of trees on development sites,
which will render the trees unviable.
Recommendations:
• I recommend to remove these trees and replace with more appropriate species.
Section 15
Tree 21
Pandanus
Description:
• This large plant has one extend branch which will block crane access required to
complete works.
Recommendations:
• I recommend to remove this branch
Implementation of tree protection measures during construction
All work is to be carried out in accordance with the Australian Standard AS4970-2009-
Protection of trees on development sites
Care is required to minimize the impact on trees located within the property and the adjoining
properties. Exclusion, with fencing and supervision while working within the identified
TPZ’s will allow the retaining walls replacement work to be carried without unduly affecting
the continued health of the adjoining trees.
Section 16
Protection of trees to be retained:
To preserve the retained trees within this site tree exclusion zones must be determined. To
calculate these zones the formula has been used from the Australian Standard AS4970-2009
Protection of trees on development sites. This is the “Tree Protection Zone”.
Any encroachment, disturbance, or compaction of the soil within the Tree Protection Zone
can damage or destroy the fine absorbing roots. Injury caused by cutting, crushing,
suffocation, poisoning, or moisture stress by inundation or dehydration can result in damage
to a tree. The effects of some Injuries may not be apparent for some time.
The following guidelines are minimum standard I recommended for the preservation of these
trees. These guidelines should be incorporated in construction contracts, and the details made
available to all parties involved with work on the site, including equipment operators. Other
guidelines and protective measures may also be appropriate, in addition to those listed below.
1. Protection Barrier: A suitable protection barrier is to be installed around the trees to
be preserved. The barrier shall be constructed of durable fencing material, such as
plastic construction fencing or chain-link fencing. The barrier shall be installed at
the Tree Protection Zone perimeter. The fencing is to be maintained in good repair
throughout the duration of the project, and should not be removed, relocated, or
encroached upon without permission of the consulting arborist.
2. Storage of Materials: There is to be no storage of materials or supplies of any kind
within the area of the protection barriers. Concrete and cement materials, block,
stone, sand and soil are not being placed within any Tree Protection Zones.
3. Fuel Storage: Fuel storage will not be permitted within 30 meters of any tree to be
preserved. Refueling, servicing and maintenance of equipment and machinery will
not be permitted within 30 meters of protected tree.
4. Debris and Waste Materials: Debris and waste from construction or other activities
cannot be permitted within the Tree Protection Zones. Wash-down of concrete or
cement handling equipment, in particular, will not be permitted within 30 meters of
protected tree.
5. Altered Site Hydrology: No changes in soil surface hydrology, any grade changes
proposed that will impact on the Tree Protection Zones should be approved by the
consulting Arborist before construction begins.
6. Damages: All precautions should be taken to mitigate any potential injuries to the
protected trees and any damages or injuries should be reported to the project arborist
as soon as possible. Severed roots shall be pruned cleanly to healthy tissue, using
sharp clean pruning tools. Broken branches or limbs are to be pruned in accordance
with the Australian Standard AS4373-2007 Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Assessed by: David Hawthorne Dip Arb AHC50510
Consulting Arborist AQF5 Dip Hort/Arb RTF50203
Dip Hort RTF50103
MQAA / ISA QTRA
AIH RH0150
Section 17
Architect:
1
1 : 200
30°41'30"
14.844
BOAQ; Reg. #5314
1. SITE PLAN
Top of Rendered
Wall
Wall
Wall
10 .42
10.38
To10.87
Wa p T
ll im
Top Timber Ret
Top Timber Ret
be
r
R1e0
t .8
0
10
.9
5
To
UP
Po p
9.94
s
st of
15
11 .8
4
0
.14
di
12Timber Ret
12.86 8.240
a
Top Top of Timber Ret 12.72 12 .6
Wall 8
Wall
12 .74 TREE TR
W
12 .7
3
TREE TREE
0.2 TREE 0. EE
l
TREE 2
To
0.15 0.15
p
1 0.15
TR
12 0.2
.7 4
7 .2
al T
9
0.3
EE
im
14
.6
0
be
r
Re
t
TR
E
0.1 E
14.50
0.3
UP
TREE
15 .4
4
B
Top
W all Rock
Roof
EMT
16 .1 To
7 p
W al Tim
16.3
7 Top Roc l b er
k 16 .4 16 R
.0et
Wall 6 6
16 .9
16 .8 3
4
Top Rock
17 .21
17.05
17.09
Wall
17.52 17 .0
APPROVED PLAN
1
17
Top
.4
17
0.4
17.57
4
Wall Rock .8
3
TR 1 4
EE 08
Beam
Above
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL
18 .4
1
51987.3004.01 7 MAR 2023
19 19 .2
.4 9
9
19.50
19 .5
0
Seat
21.730
120°25'00"
0.2
TR 1 1
RP
EE 06
56
BU
© COPYRIGHT KINGS LANE ARCHITECTS PTY LTD. REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN ANY PART IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
23
P9
08
22 .6
9
1
95
CP 25
22
.6
1
22.31
22 .3
1 Top Timber Ret 1
22.61
.6
22 Wall
22
1 .6
1
22.6
BBQ
23 .7
8
Floor
1
B
C
A
Level
50.716
RL25.85 Top Timber Ret 23 .9
Section 18
Rev:
0
300°23'00"
24 .8
9 Wall 25
2 5.0
25 1
25
.0 2
25
25 .4 .5
6 2
TT
Date:
25
.2
Revision Notes:
0
0.4
1 Top of Timber Ret 25 .74
31
0 25 .8
2 Wall 25 .7
7
Shade Sail TR E
TREE 26 .2
TREE 0.3 E 1
28.07.2022
08.06.2022
14.02.2022
09.02.2022
Post 12
0.41 512 0.251006 Sail 07
26.46
Sh ade
GI
26.3 2 26 .3 Po st 26 .2
7
0.4
Fen
Top of Timber Ret3 26 .2
TREE 4
ce
BW 1 4
Mes
Wall 26 .7
0.21207 27 .0
2 1
h
26 .8
10
1
27.5
27 .5
WA
0.3 T
14
27 .9 10
7 210°25'00"
Notes:
1.600
TREE
0.20808
DETAIL DESIGN
CONCEPT DESIGN
29 .7
30 BW 7
TREE
0.21208 30 .1
0.31310 9
29 .5
5
PRELIM CONCEPT DESIGN
30
BW
0.251207
31 .2
1 BW
W AT 0.315
0.25 12
31.89 1212
Fence
Paling
FOR CONSTRUCTION / FOR APPROVAL
32 .2
7
BW
32.5 0.41210
WAT
32 .5
0.31008
UMB
0.51008
16.626
CHEESE
0.61210
120°25'00"
33 .3
1
BW
WAT
0.31
4
34 .4 UMB 0.31008 008
0.30806 34 .8
2
35
BW 35
1.01612
35 .6
5
CORK
0.31008
36 .5
6 CORK 37 .1
3
0.451410
0.4
BW 0 8
Fence
37.5
08
37.5
GI Mesh
TREE
0.20707
0.61
38 .0
0
B W 308
IB
0.72018
'00"
RP
39 .4
200°30
6
21.746
52
39 .9
0
40
62 918
40
40 .2
1
.1 5
40 .4
4
Client:
RP
61
52
MR. J.B PRESCOTT
91
8
RP
4567
52
91
6 Park Rd
60 8
Drawing Title:
Project Address:
SITE PLAN
Noosa Heads QLD
A001
Project No.
Drawing No:
KLA533
FOR APPROVAL
FOR CONSTRUCTION
Date:
1
Rev No :
Scale @ A3:
28.07.2022
As indicated
Section 19
NEW POST & PLANK
RETAINING WALLS WITH TIE
25
BACKS AS PER ENG. DETAILS
NEW SLAB TO UNDERCROFT AS
RW - SL
PER ENG. DETAILS
up
BBQ
S/W PIT AS PER ENG. DETAILS
EX. PILED WALL CONC.
Seat
CAPPING BEAM - SETOUT TBC EXISTING.
ON SITE EX. HR
NEW BLOCK RETAINING WALLS AS
PER ENG. DETAILS.
FA
L
RW - SL
27.5
L
NEW RW FIXED TO EX. CONC
CAPPING BEAM- REFER STRUCT
EX. HR
ENG. DETAILS EXT. T1
Sail
FFL 8.62 up EX. FFL - 17.01 EX. TO REMAIN
Shade
Post
EX. RETAINING WALLS TO BE
LL
REPLACED W/ CONC.
FA
2
SLEEPERS / TBC BY BUILDER
RW - CONC.
EXT. T1
FFL 9.67 TDK1 A500
+ ENGINEER
NEW CONC. WALL TO REPLACE EX. EX. FFL - 11.04
BAL 3
Beam
EXISTING - TO STRUCT. ENG DETAILS
Above
L
UP NEW TERRACE SLAB FOR BRACING
L
FA
RW
STRENGTHENED R/WALL
AL L
1
BAL
-C
NEW HR TO MATCH EXISTING - To ON
C. W
Po p C .
AGAINST BUILDING WALLS.
BAL 3 st of
CON
s 15
0d
PROVIDE FALL TO S/W PITS. AS PER
ia ENG. DETAILS.
-
NEW CONC. RETAINING
RW
BA
BA
WALLTO STRUCT ENG. DETAILS L
UP
L
1
3
TDK1
TDK1
FA
NEW RAKING SLABS WITH
LL
TIMBER STAIRS BUILT OVER TO
il
Roof
Shade Sa
STRUCT ENG. DETAILS REMOVE EXISTING DECK AND
Post
REBUILD OVER NEW SLAB. AS
NEW BALUSTRADE TO STAIRS 1 PER ENG. DETAILS
A500 NEW BLOCK RETAINING WALLS AS
FA
EX. STONE WALLS TO REMAIN PER ENG. DETAILS.
LL
EX. FFL - 14.19
RL25.85
S/W PIT AS PER ENG. DETAILS
Floor
Level
EX. FFL - 14.38
LL
NOTE : ALL LANDING
FA
LEVELS + RISER HEIGHTS
TO MATCH EXISTING
25
REPLACE EX. DECK WITH NEW
27.5
1 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION
7
27.9
h
1 : 100 Mes
2
.02
GI
25.8
ce
Fen
25
ALUMN. BATTEN SCREEN TO DECK FOR APPROVAL
Architect:
Revision Notes: Project Address: Project No. Date:
6 Park Rd 28.07.2022
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL
Rev: Date: Notes:
Noosa Heads QLD
KLA533
A 09.02.2022 PRELIM CONCEPT DESIGN
B 14.02.2022 CONCEPT DESIGN 4567 Scale @ A3:
APPROVED PLAN C 08.06.2022 DETAIL DESIGN Client: Drawing Title: Drawing No: 1 : 100
51987.3004.01 7 MAR 2023 1 28.07.2022 FOR CONSTRUCTION / FOR APPROVAL MR. J.B PRESCOTT PROPOSED
BOAQ; Reg. #5314 A100 Rev No :
FLOOR PLAN
1
© COPYRIGHT KINGS LANE ARCHITECTS PTY LTD. REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN ANY PART IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
Section 20
CONCRETE RETAINING
WALL TO REPLACE EXISTING
ALUM. SECTION &
TIMBER PROFILE TO BE FIXED WATERPROOFING TO
CONC. SECTION - TBC 250
EX. OVER CONCRETE CAST STAIRS
2 - LEVELS TO MATCH FLUSH BY BUILDER
Tbc on site
A500 WITH EXISTING
SOLID TIMBER GRADE 1
SPECIES - CLEAR SEAL
RW-CONC TO RISER & TREAD
NEW FINISHES FLUSH
Tbc on site
W/ EXISTING. NEW
172
CONSTRUCTION TO CONCRETE STAIRS W/
MATCH EXISTING TIMBER PROFILE
10
OVERLAY - STRUCTURE TO
00
LEVELS
Mi
ENG. DETAILS
n.
stairs angled
3
EX. TILED STAIRS A500
RETAINED AND MADE
GOOD FOR AFTER 3 NOSING DETAIL
NEW CONSTRUCTION EX. 1 : 10
18 [email protected] mm H
RC PILE CAP AND tbc on site
SCREW PIERS TO
STRUCT. ENG DETAILS 50mm eclipse
50mm eclipse handrail -
1 STAIRS - CONSTRUCTION DETAIL pwd coated Bronze finish
handrail - Bronze pwd.
50 x 25mm Pwd. Alum coated finish
1 : 50 bar / section w/ eclipse
handrail 50 x 50mm Pwd. Alum 50mm / 25mm Alum
section - Bronze finish bar - Bronze pwd.
coated finish
50mm Alum bar -
Bronze pwd. coated
CONC. RETAINING WALL TO finish
STRUCTURAL ENG. DETAILS 50mm Alum post -
Bronze pwd. coated
890
finish
850
BAL 1
WATERPROOFING
890
MEMBRANE & AG PIPE TO TDK1
STRUCT. ENG DETAILS tbc on site - conc
footing to support new
balustrade to existing
BAL1 bolted to
continuous angle
fixed to conc. stairs
2 RW / STAIR - DETAIL 4 BAL 1 - TYP ELEV. 5 BAL 3 - TYP.
1 : 20 1 : 20 1 : 20 FOR CONSTRUCTION
FOR APPROVAL
Architect:
Revision Notes: Project Address: Project No. Date:
6 Park Rd 28.07.2022
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL
Rev: Date: Notes:
Noosa Heads QLD
KLA533
A 09.02.2022 PRELIM CONCEPT DESIGN
B 14.02.2022 CONCEPT DESIGN 4567 Scale @ A3:
APPROVED PLAN C 08.06.2022 DETAIL DESIGN Client: Drawing Title: Drawing No: As indicated
51987.3004.01 7 MAR 2023 1 28.07.2022 FOR CONSTRUCTION / FOR APPROVAL MR. J.B PRESCOTT CONSTRUCTION A500
BOAQ; Reg. #5314 Rev No :
DETAILS
1
© COPYRIGHT KINGS LANE ARCHITECTS PTY LTD. REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN ANY PART IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
Section 21
LF1 - STAIR WALL LIGHTS LF2 - GARDEN ENTRY LIGHTS
EXISTING STAIR TILE
HANDRAIL - BRONZE FINISH HANDRAIL - ECLIPSE PROFILE NEW TIMBER STAIR TREAD - STAIN / SEAL APPLICATION TBC
FOR CONSTRUCTION
FOR APPROVAL
Architect:
Revision Notes: Project Address: Project No. Date:
6 Park Rd 28.07.2022
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL
Rev: Date: Notes:
Noosa Heads QLD
KLA533
A 09.02.2022 PRELIM CONCEPT DESIGN
B 14.02.2022 CONCEPT DESIGN 4567 Scale @ A3:
APPROVED PLAN C 08.06.2022 DETAIL DESIGN Client: Drawing Title: Drawing No:
51987.3004.01 7 MAR 2023 1 28.07.2022 FOR CONSTRUCTION / FOR APPROVAL MR. J.B PRESCOTT FITTINGS &
BOAQ; Reg. #5314 A800 Rev No :
FINISHES
1
© COPYRIGHT KINGS LANE ARCHITECTS PTY LTD. REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN ANY PART IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
Used in these records
Approved Plans & Report - 51987.3004.01Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 4.9 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.