Original source · versioned page text
2018-04-10 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 10 APRIL 2018
REPORTS FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMITTEE
1 PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL NO. 456/2018 - REFUSAL OF
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR RECONFIGURING A LOT AT 2 DAVID LOW WAY,
CASTAWAYS BEACH
DOCUMENT INFORM AT ION
Author Manager Development Assessment, Kerri Coyle
Environment & Sustainable Development Department
Index ECM/ Application / RAL17/0501 / Case/ Kenlynn Pty Ltd
Attachments Nil
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Not applicable.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Manager Development Assessment to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 10 April 2018 regarding Planning & Environment Court
Appeal No. 456/2018 and agree to defend the appeal.
REPORT
A report on this application to subdivide 1 lot into 6 residential lots and create an access
easement at 2 David Low Way, Castaways Beach was considered by Council at its Ordinary
Meeting on 18 January 2018.
Council at its Ordinary Meeting on 18 January 2018 resolved to refuse the application for the
following reasons:
1. The proposed development is contrary to the Overall and Specific Outcomes of the Eastern
Beaches Locality Code of the Noosa Plan. The development proposes significant clearing
that is contrary to the Locality Code which requires protection of the vegetated character
and views from the David Low Way and protection of native vegetation.
2. The proposed development is contrary to the Biodiversity code as it involves clearing of
vegetation that is mapped as Environmental Protection and Riparian vegetation under the
Noosa Plan.
3. The proposed development will result in unacceptable impacts on the visual amenity and
character of the area.
4. The applicant has not demonstrated that a compliant, safe access is able to be provided to
the site in accordance with required standards. To achieve a safe access significant
clearing of vegetation and earthworks in the road reserve is also likely to be required.
5. The proposal is an overdevelopment of the site with the resultant development form
detrimentally affecting the environmental and amenity values of the site.
6. The proposed development represents a poor planning outcome for the site, with the
subdivision layout failing to provide street frontage for the lots and an excessive number of
lots with access via an easement. The proposed access arrangements are likely to result
in ongoing management and maintenance issues for future residents of these lots.
Page 3 of 38
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.