Original source · versioned page text
PM Submission Object - Christine Crook & James White MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
From: James White
Sent: 23 Apr 2017 12:00:35 +1000
To: Mailbox Council Mail
Subject: Mr. Patrick Murphy
Attachments: img494.jpg, img495.jpg
Dear Mr. Murphy,
Enclosed is our objection to the Scanlon Group Development Proposal.
Sincerely,
Christine Crook and James White.
Document Set ID: 20306925
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.
Full text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
Document Set ID: 20306925 Patrick Murphy The Assessment Officer Noosa Shire Council [email protected] Dear Mr Murphy, File No MCU 16/153 REC 16/0041 Postal Address 215 David Low Way, PEREGIAN BEACH Proposed Development Multiple Housing-Type 4, Visitor Accommodation 1) The Development will significantly impact on the Creek and Wetland, both during construction and upon completion. It is of tremendous concern, as is the planned density of housing on top of and beside this ecologically sensitive reserve, adjacent Noosa National Park — Emu Swamp Section. The natural spring. known locally as Little Rufous Creek creates a watercourse that feeds into the wetland and contributes to its ecological value. Thousands of cubic metres of imported fill will be required, giving rise to extensive and congestive heavy and large size vehicular traffic for several months. The impact of such large amount of fill will create fragmentation and attrition of the watercourse, its habitat values and biodiversity. An environmental injustice for Queensland’s Government’s identified Mandatory Essential Habitat. 2) The setbacks in general and to the Rufous laneway in particular, impinge on Noosa’s Master Plan for the Rufous Street Renewal which is currently in progress, community amenity values and the extensive community consultation process intended to activate the Bush to Beach pathway upgrade and encourage increased usage. The leafy ambience planned for both Rufous laneway and Pocket Park to encourage parking and pedestrian access to the village would be greatly compromised by the 2m proximity and 7m height of the proposed Reed and Wallum buildings, on top of whatever level of fill is added to natural eround level. 3) There’s No Compliance with Noosa Council requirements with the majority of the accommodation proposed for Permanent Housing. Priced from $725,000 to $850,000, this proposal hardly provides low cost visitor accommodation for the needs of this community nor the wider Noosa Shire. Peregian Beach has already been adversely impacted by nearby ‘new’ small lot housing developments that lack public amenity, open space and village lifestyle. Low cost accommodation for campers and RVs would be an acceptable community solution, celebrating the open space and providing a beach holiday experience for all. 4) Significant and continuous Noise and Disruption to homes along David Low Way, adjoining streets. laneway, Peregian Beach Hotel, Hardware store, business and private premises in the vicinity of the roadways and roundabout is guaranteed. The impact will be to the detriment of acoustic and visual qualities, 1
Page 3
Document Set ID: 20306925 lifestyle, holiday village ambience and business, especially the al fresco dining/coffee shops that all enjoy fresh air and ocean sounds. 5) Other concerns include density of buildings and infrastructure within the precinct, the provision of scarce ereen space/vegetation/shade, preferred orientation to sunlight and natural breezes, the provision of public access pathway between two story buildings, with little to recommend passive surveillance, particularly at night. Light pollution is a further issue, as every new light bulb impacts adversely on Peregian’s disappearing night sky, particularly of concern with the density planned for this site. | This proposal conflicts with community values, endorsed by all who reside and those who choose this relaxed pedestrian location. It delivers instead, undesirable urban density and city lifestyle that’s aesthetically at odds with Peregian’s much sought after relaxed village character and community engagement. We strongly urge Noosa Council to protect and retain the village of Peregian Beach, to stand firm behind the intent of the Noosa Town Plan and refuse this Development Application. Christine M. Crook Ja 7Jabiru Street, Peregian Beach 4573 3 2 ox = om : gaia ie prea ie / a Pee pm ae Bae St Se Sa SESS SIS CESS RL SES % ee FE: % CU % 4% LB S82 ¥Ge CUPISS TP CPTOOK £7 GEOG COT en KD BATS Ber M5. WI YS BY SS id. See, BA 3 a a ee a Mobile: 0400511581 23 April 2017 Dias cass asad incecpnanansagabnaccubGaies sasuamioesgucesisetbuanansaotapasaplanasdres'ace digg gt adpamiccnastbovachavsddvnnt vas teckvinessasoneshation Dr. James J. White farmer [a hate 7Jabiru Street, Peregian Beach 4573 [email protected] Phone: 54483063 23 April 2017