Council archive · source document
001511C5.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
Specific Outcomes and Probable Solutions for the Semi-attached Housing Zone
Table.1
column 1 column 2 Column 3
. Specific Outcomes Probable solutions (if code assessable) Compliance
‘Built: form: ‘
Streetscape character
036 Buildings and other structures— $36.1 The main entrance of the building faces Complies - defined entrance to the units
a) contribute positively to the streetscape and is recognisable from the street; provided along sides of building.
character by addressing the street and AND
“adding visual interest through stepping the $36.2 Buildings and other structures are Complies -
front fagade; * designed to—
b) have a bulk and architectural scale that a) have a maximum wall length of 15m and a) Building well articulated with decks and
does not dominate the streetscape or each external wall plane incorporates at | balconies and design elements.
detract from the visual amenity of adjoining least one design element to add visual
properties; interest and amenity (such as windows,
c) present as a small building of a domestic pergolas, sun shading devices, balconies ,
scale within a landscaped setting; or a change of building material)(see
d) present well articulated fagades where Figure.1 and Figure Error! No text of .
garages or carports are not the dominant specified style in document..2); | b) Multiple roof lines provided.
visual element when viewed from the street; |b) vary and break up the roof form through
and gables or different pitches to add visual
e) present well articulated fagades where interest and define the individual dwelling .
garages or carports are not the dominant units (see Figure.1 and Figure Error! No c) Individual balconies and articulation provided |.
visual element when viewed from the street; text of specified style in document..2); to building. .
. . c) provide individual segmented balconies for ;
buuiding bulke of design features to break up each dwelling unit to reduce dominant
. horizontal banding and to provide private
ae ao open space for each tenancy (see d) Differing materials such as rendered masonry
a 1 ™.. 5 Figure.1 and Figure Error! No text of wails, timber screening, stone cladding and
3 if HE Hees a specified style in document..2); glass balustrades used to highlight the
Sb Pa | Abel _ ara d) break up building fagades by incorporating | articulation of the building.
5 a) FT = z r o different but complimentary colours, e) Tall species able to be provided along sides
=r. le EL Ee a textures and building materials; and and at front of site.
~ ee e) visually break up the bulk of the building
by integrating tall plant species in front of | Not applicable ~
Figure Error! No text of specified style in and to the side of buildings;
document..2—Adding visual interest to facades | AND
$36.3 For corner sites the building design :
addresses both street frontages by— .
a) including doors and windows on each face
of the building that fronts a road; and
b) incorporating an access point from eachSee the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
001511C5.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
07/0799 - MCU - Multiple Housing Type 2 Duplex [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 4.5 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.