Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Council archive · source document

Response to Further Information · MCU19/0055

of 3

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Our ref: 181112



4 July 2019

The Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Council
PO Box 141
TEWANTIN QLD 4565

Attention:          Development Assessment – Glen Conforti
Via Email:          [email protected]

Dear Glen,

Re:        Response to Information Request
           Proposed Development Application for Material Change of Use
           & Operational Works to establish a Type 2 Duplex
           27 Hill Street, Sunshine Beach
           Lot 93 on RP94566
           Council ref: MCU19/0055 & OPW19/0115

I refer to Council’s Information Request, dated 14 June 2019 in relation to the
abovementioned development.

On behalf of the applicant, AR Pannifex, and in accordance with Part 3(13) of the DA
Rules 2017, we provide a response to all the issues raised. A response to the items
raised in Councils Information Request is outlined below:

      1.   Please provide an updated plan with a Plot ratio of 0.45:1.

RESPONSE
Please refer to the updated Proposal Plans prepared by Icon Building Design (Attachment
1). As demonstrated in Sheet 09, the amended layout provides a total GFA of 227.3m2,
and results in a Plot Ratio of 0.448:1, which is compliant with Specific Outcome O8 of the
Eastern Beaches Locality Plan.



      2.   Please provide a greater landscaped area than that proposed.

RESPONSE
Please refer to the updated Proposal Plans prepared by Icon Building Design (Attachment
1). As demonstrated in Sheet 09, the development provides a total landscaping extent of
212.6m2, comprising of 133m2 of soft landscaping and 79.6m2 of hard landscaping.

This is compliant with the minimum landscaping area requirement of 192m2, as well as the
minimum soft landscaping requirement of 115m2, as required by the Landscaping Code.
Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

    3.   Please replace the Foxtail Palms with a local native species in accordance with PSP 3 (Bangalow Palms
         would be acceptable but other suitable local tree species would be preferred.)

RESPONSE
Please see the attached updated Landscaping Plan prepared by Studio8 Concept and Design (Attachment 2),
which replaces Foxtail Palms with Bangalow Palms.



    4.   Please provide a mix of external finishes/materials to the development with particular attention to the
         southern and northern facades.

RESPONSE
As discussed with assessing officer Glen Conforti, the development contains a highly articulated building façade
to Hill Street (south-east), Pacific Avenue (north-east), as well as the side boundary (south-west). It was
discussed that the Council’s primary concern pertained to the treatment of the side boundary (north-west).

Please refer to Sheet 07 of the amended architectural plans prepared by Icon Building Design (Attachment 1),
which proses an additional extrusion to provide further vertical and horizontal articulation to the building
façade. It is noted that the additional extrusion remains compliant with the side boundary setbacks.




Figure 1 Amended North-West Elevation (Source: Icon Building Design)




    5.   Provide sight distances assessment for the access driveway to Hill Street and identify any necessary
         works within the road verge and/or amendment to the plans to comply with Section 3.2.4 of
         Australian Standard AS2890.1. Update plans accordingly.

RESPONSE
Please refer to the Sight Distance Report prepared by Structures Engineering Design (Attachment 3). As
outlined within the report, the proposed driveways are not located within the prohibited distances to
intersections. The provided correspondence identifies that there are no obstructions to sight distance from
either driveway, with the exception of a strand of trees located on the eastern corner of the subject site, which
are required to be removed to ensure safe entry and exit of the site in accordance with the requirements of
AS2890.1.

Page 3

        6.   Provide updated plans to address the following:
             a. Replacement of the existing bitumen pathway along both frontages of the site (Hill Street and
             Pacific Avenue) with a 2.0m wide concrete pathway in accordance with the current standard drawing.
             b. Upgrade the existing kerb ramp in compliance with current standard drawing.
             c. Upgrading the connection pathway between the new ramp and the new pathway to 2.0m wide
             concrete pathway.

             Please note the pathway is trunk infrastructure.

RESPONSE
Please find enclosed updated proposal plans prepared by Icon Building Design (Attachment 1), as well as the
updated Engineering Documentation prepared by Structures Engineering (Attachment 4), which demonstrates
the footpath upgrades.

It is requested that Council provide a lineal metre rate that Council applies to the upgrades, to clarify the extent
of offset likely to be applied to Council’s Infrastructure Charges Notice.



This response represents our complete response to the Information Request issued by the Noosa Council, and
we look forward to the decision notice being issued by Council in accordance with the relevant provisions of
the Planning Act 2016.

As always, please feel free to contact me direct should you require any additional information or clarification.

Yours faithfully,
ADAMS + SPARKES
TOWN PLANNING + DEVELOPMENT




Michael Lyell
MANAGING DIRECTOR

Encl:         Amended Architectural Plans, prepared by Icon Building Design (Attachment 1)
              Landscape Plan prepared by Studio8 (Attachment 2)
              Sight Distance Report, prepared by Structure Engineering Design (Attachment 3)
              Updated Engineering Plans, prepared by Structure Engineering Design (Attachment 4)

Cc:           AP Pannifex

Used in these records

About this file

File size
521 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Response to Further Information.pdf · 521 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.