Original source · versioned page text
2202-27408 SRA - Response
Attached to the e-mail RAL22/0001 - SARA Referral agency response - No requirements.
2202-27408 SRA
Attachment 2—Reasons for referral agency response
(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)
Reasons for SARA’s decision
The proposed development complies with State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road
environment and State code 2: Development in a railway environment of SDAP. Specifically, the
development:
does not create a safety hazard for users of a state-controlled road or railway
does not compromise the structural integrity of state-controlled roads, road transport infrastructure or
road works, railways, rail transport infrastructure, other rail infrastructure or railway works
does not result in a worsening of the physical condition or operating performance of state-controlled
roads, railways or the rail network
does not compromise the state’s ability to cost-effectively construct, operate and maintain state-
controlled roads and railways
does not compromise the structural integrity of public passenger transport infrastructure or
compromise the operating performance of public passenger transport services on state-controlled
roads.
Material used in the assessment of the application:
the development application material and submitted plans
Planning Act 2016
Planning Regulation 2017
SDAP (version 2.6), as published by SARA
the Development Assessment Rules
SARA DA Mapping system
Human Rights Act 2019.
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 4 of 5
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original (2202-27408 SRA - Response.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.