Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Council archive · source document

PART Response to Information Request · OPW11/0335

of 97

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (26.7 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

 Denying the use Gazania species is curious as it has been planted throughout the new esplanade works at
 Bulcock Beach, up and down Nicklin Way, along medians and on David Low Way at Mount Coolum, and the
 adjacent Heron Street roundabout (see image below).




 The plans are now Compliant with the Information Requested.



 Issue
 Fencing to the site is not shown on the landscaping plans and, as such, the requirements of the
 conditions of the material change of use approval are unable to be assessed.

 Information Required
 15     Provide information on fencing to the site, in particular to the frontage and side boundaries.

 Response: There was no fencing proposed to the frontage and / or side boundaries on the previously
 submitted landscape plans nor is there now. Having said that, the landscape plans have been amended to
 nominally indicate Fauna Friendly Fencing locations. Refer to the Ecological Restoration Plans prepared by
 RPS for more information. Herewith are amended plans, Issue B.

 The plans are Compliant with the Information Requested.



 Issue
 All trees to be retalnedlremoved are not shown on the submitted landscape plans as per condition 16 in
 "A" of P&E Court Judgement No. 2587 of 2008. In order to assess the compliance with conditions 21.1
 this information needs to be supplied.

 Information Required
 16     Provide additional plan to show all tree to be retained/removed in accordance with condition 16
        in "A" of P&E Court Judgement No. 2587 of 2008.
                (a) In accordance with condition 21.1 in "A" of P&E Court Judgement No. 258 of 2008
                    provide a clear assessment of the compliance with this condition.

 Response: The previously submitted plans did clearly indicate site trees to be retained (see Issue A LD03 for
 Legend and LP06 and LP12) within the landscaping limits of work. The previously submitted engineer's and
 architect's plans clearly indicate that the site was to be VOID of existing trees (with a few exceptions).

 Regardless, herewith we have amended the landscape plans, Issue B, and have added an additional plan as
 requested - refer Sheet LP13 for the Tree Retained / Removal Plan - Issue A.

 The plans are Compliant with the Information Requested.




Ph: (07) 5437 0000                      PO Box 24 Moffat Beach Q 4551                            www.anembo.com
                                                team: ,anembo.com
 2

Used in these records

About this file

File size
26.7 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

PART Response to Information Request.pdf · 26.7 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.