Council archive · source document
PART Response to Information Request · OPW11/0335
Very large file (26.7 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
commercial buildings from David Low Way's frontage. 3m wide landscape buffers are quite typical for
commercial landscape areas. The previously submitted plans and these amended landscape plans, Issue B,
clearly indicate that the landscaping extends around the commercial buildings, i.e. between the Peregian Beach
Hotel and the commercial building and the stub road and commercial building.
The plans are Compliant with the Information Requested.
21.7 Landscape treatment (including paving) to the site's road frontages shall be designed to
match in with the existing streetscape of Peregian Beach Village.
Response & Mitigation Design Rationale: The plant species selected for this project's road frontages match
those of the existing Peregian Beach Village Streetscape (PBVS), in a particular the trees species. Where this
project's species selections differ are done to satisfy other conditions such as buffering the proposed buildings
from David Low Way and the stub road. Many of the grasses along the PBVS tend to be short lived and thusly
are not sustainable. The proposed Issue B plantings will integrate seamlessly with those along PBVS.
Refer to the Architect's and / or Engineer's plans for paving information.
The landscape plans are now Compliant with the Information Requested.
21.8 Planting and maintenance regime details to address the ongoing health of all large
plantings (i.e. greater than 45L).
Response: The previously submitted plans were compliant with this sub-condition as are the amended
landscape plans, Issue B, herewith. Refer to amended plans Sheets LD1 General Notes Sections 2.0 Planting
and 3.0 Maintenance for more information. These specifications are our standard specifications and have been
approved by SCRC on numerous occasions.
Herewith are the STAGED amended plans. Refer to Sheets LD3, LP7-13 for more information.
The plans are now Compliant with the Information Requested.
Issue
Additional Information Is required on the landscaping plan demonstrating the planting of koala habitat
trees in accordance with the Koala Habitat Management Plan, June 2010 James Warren and Ass. PIL.
Information Required
Demonstrate compliance with Table I in the Koala Habitat Management Plan, June 2010 James Warren
and Ass. P/L.
Response: The previously submitted plans were compliant with this sub-condition as there were Eucalyptus
robustas and Lophostemon suaveolens specified. The report does not state that all nominated species shall be
used (and used "...where appropriate.") - the report provides a recommendation of species.
Regardless, the Issue B amended plans now have all 5 recommended Koala Habitat Trees specified and
located "where appropriate". Refer to Sheets LD3, LP7-13 for more information.
Herewith are the STAGED amended plans. Refer to Sheets LD3, LP7-13 for more information.
The plans are now Compliant with the Information Requested.
Ph: (07) 5437 0000 PO Box 24 Moffat Beach Q 4551 www anembo.com
team nanembo.com
4
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PART Response to Information RequestRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 26.7 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.