Original source · versioned page text
NPM Submission (LATE) - Geoffrey Shaw - MCU21/0110
Subject: Hotel objection Ref # MCU 21/0110 From: Rowena Faerch Date: 2022-02-01T09:39:48+00:00 To: Mailbox Council Mail External sender. Do not open links or attachments if the email is unexpected or unusual or impersonates staff. Sent from my iPhone [Attachment: Doc 01 Feb 2022, 7.38.pdf] Kk # MCV 2) Joi? Objection to the Proposed Hotel at Noosa Springs It has not gone unnoticed that this DA has been opened for comment for a short period of time just before Christmas when most people are otherwise occupied or away. No analysts has been provided in the Adamson Town Planning Report of the impact upon existing users of Noosa Springs Resort, including members and residents. This impact Is significant. The “materlal change of use” will adversely affect every person in Noosa Springs, The Oasis, Parkridge, Elysium and The Fairways (795 properties), resort staff and members. The development fails so many tests: * tt Isn’t “boutique”, In fact it will have roughly the same number of rooms as the French Quarter in Hastings Street At 12m high it will visually overpower existing buildings * Two thirds of the development Is to be built on land zoned “recreational and open space” * It breaches height and setback restrictions * Zoning maps Indicate it is a “Core Koala Habitat”, “a Koala Priority Habitat” and this will be lost together with other fauna and flora * With potentially 224 occupants, plus children and additional staff, the already existing fire evacuation risk will be significantly increased with potentially disastrous ramifications. Numerous discussions with Council in the past has done little to alleviate this very serious issue e.g. The Oasis BC Review of Emergency Evacuation Provisions * The DA suggests that the guests and staff will be arriving and leaving on 2 wheels or public transport. This is just not realistic * Analready busy carpark will be inadequate for guests, staff, golfers and those who use the spa, gym, medical facilities, restaurant etc. It is already over capacity at peak times and the Parking Studies lack meaningful analysis * There will be Increased noise and activity in an area where many elderly people reside and will affect the quiet enjoyment and wellbeing of residents and potentially their security and safety * The club house, golf course, gym, restaurant, spa and pool will not be as available to residents and members with Tee Times likely to be at a premium as hotel guests will likely be given priority * The developers are potentially “double-dipping” as the land originally earmarked for a hotel was used to build Parkridge. Many of the above serve to undermine the integrity of the Noosa Plan 2020. 1 object to the Application for the proposed hotel on the above grounds. GeoFre, SHAW RA\~__L Name Date "7 (i2(20 THQ Nome Yeangs Dave
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (NPM Submission (LATE) - Geoffrey Shaw - MCU21_0110.msg)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.