Original source · versioned page text
DAF Shark Control Program - Recommended Council Policy Position · Report
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 17 JUNE 2024
Funds to purchase equipment
and materials to enable Noosa
Council to undertake initial
response to whale stranding
events under the NCA. In-turn,
mitigating shark risks to ocean
Marine animal (whale) stranding $12,500 users during strandings. Note
response (site containment and Replacement of the Senior Wildlife Officer
preparation of carcass for (24/25 budget used materials would be responsible for the
removal) proposal) programs coordination. It is
noted that beyond the
equipment and resources
required for Council to respond
to a stranding, contractor fees
for carcass removal will also
apply.
The design and install of
approximately 15 advisory
Dangerous marine animal signs in key public use areas
stranding advisory signage – Nil $15,000 surrounding Noosa
Noosa Waters canal system Waters. Note that this activity
will require staff resources
from ES and IS.
Risk & Opportunities
Scenario 1: Council does not adopt a clear policy position of the DAF SCP.
Potential Risk: Negative environmental community perception - Council may be seen to exclude
marine life from our environmental values within Noosa Shire. Having no policy position on the SCP
does not align with a number of themes within the Noosa Environment Strategy.
Opportunity: A clear policy position would enable Council to effectively support DAF in future
SharkSmart and alternative bite mitigation trials. Council would also be able to effectively address
and respond to community requests regarding Council's position and pro-active, positive
involvement in the SCP.
Scenario 2: Council does not consider to adequately fund or resource marine animal stranding
response.
Risk: Council in unable to adequately contain and prepare a carcass for removal. Council also has
a delayed response time and incurs significantly higher contracted costs, negative media attention
and poor community outcomes. The presence of whale carcasses on beaches almost always results
in the presence of large sharks within the surf zone, and an ineffective and delayed response may
pose a significant liability risk to Council regarding human safety.
Scenario 3: Council does not investigate the suitability of dangerous marine animal advisory
signage at Council managed canal systems.
Risk: Noosa Council does not align with other South East Queensland Council's in this area.
Potential liability risks may occur to Council in the event of a negative public interaction with a
dangerous marine animal within Council managed canal systems. Council may choose align the
signage investigation with the outcomes of the Bull Shark Study currently occurring within the Noosa
River.
Consultation
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original