Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

Dewatering Management Plan

of 44

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.

Log in to see the plans as drawn
                                                                                           ADG Consulting Pty Ltd


     The soil profile of comprised predominantly of fine to medium grained silty sands, which has a hydraulic
     conductivity of 8.2 m/day, or equivalent 0.0000949 L/sec (WA Calculator). The results of the calculation
     are shown in Table 4 below, and a copy of the output is provided in Appendix D.

     Table 4 Dewatering extraction rate results

                               Output                                                Result

      Effective radius of dewatering spears (m)                                        11
      Dewatering radius of influence (m)                                               79
      Discharge rate (L/sec)                                                           7
      Discharge rate (L/hr)                                                         25,200
      Establishment of cone of depression (hours)                                     111


     Based on the above inputs, a groundwater flow rate of approximately 7 L/sec or 420 L/min or 25,200 L/hr
     has been predicted for the development, with the estimated cone of depression radius to be
     predominantly limited to within 3 m of the secant pile shoring wall. Flow rates are predicted to be highest
     during initial drawdown of the groundwater table within the basement excavation footprint, and
     reducing to approximately 5 – 6 L/sec following establishment of the cone of depression within the
     excavation. Flow rates may fluctuate due to tidal variations, generally approximately ± 0.5 m, and will
     also be influenced by rainfall and surface water collection within the basement excavation footprint
     noting the underlying predominantly sand profile encountered during geotechnical investigations.

     Regardless of the contractor employed, groundwater treatment systems should be installed with
     capability for treating flow rates of up to 8 to 10 L/sec, as a contingency against higher than anticipated
     flow rates exceeding the estimated 7 L/sec as a result of varying ground conditions across the extent of
     excavation.

     However, it should be noted that the WA Calculator provides a conservative assessment of inflows to an
     excavation footprint based on area and depth but does not take account of the method of perimeter
     piling i.e. steel sheet pile or contiguous pile walls, which will inhibit lateral inflows. Also note that the
     cone of depression radius measure includes water table depressions of 1 mm depth or more, so any
     significant depression of the water table is limited to much closer to the spear point dewatering spears
     (generally within 3 to 10 m from the shoring wall in fine‐medium grained sands, depending on density of
     the strata).
5.4 Dewatering duration
     Dewatering will be necessary throughout the basement construction phase, which is expected to require
     dewatering for approximately 8 to 12 weeks. To minimise the potential impacts during construction of
     short‐term dewatering, periods of active dewatering will be minimised as much as possible. However,
     ADG notes that once active dewatering has commenced, dewatering will not be able to be ceased until
     both: a) the basement hydrostatic uplift forces have been compensated to the satisfaction of the
     consulting RPEQ engineer; and b) potential hydraulic loading on the external face of the sheet pile or
     contiguous pile shoring system has been compensated to the satisfaction of the consulting RPEQ engineer
     and shoring contractor.
5.5 Groundwater drawdown
     Groundwater drawdown caused by dewatering has the potential to create settlement in unconsolidated
     sediments and loose sands. It is noted that dilapidation reports for surrounding structures and services
     are proposed to be undertaken which were not supplied to ADG for the purposes of preparing this DMP,
     and are to be provided to Council separately from this DMP.

     Groundwater drawdown may also oxidise potential acid sulfate soils within the cone of depression,
     subsequently producing acidic groundwater conditions and mobilising heavy metals. Monitoring of the

ADG1786.25 Dewatering Management Plan_Rev0_20.02.25                                                        Page 10
Log in to download the original file

Dewatering Management Plan.pdf · 3.2 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.