Council archive · source document
response to information request 22 arakoon · MCU19/0008.02
3 March 2023 Georgina Schramm Noosa Council [email protected] RE: Response to Further Advice Request (MCU19/0008.02) Minor Change to approval situated at 22 Arakoon Cres, Sunshine Beach Council issued a further advice request on 3 February 2023. The following additional information provides a response to Council’s request items: 1. Revise plans to remove screens around ‘Patio 2’ and roof over Patio 1 & 2, and retaining walls where located within 15 metre rear setback. 2. Reduce the extent of the upper-level awning to be within the 15 metre setback. The amended plans have removed the screening element along the south eastern corner of the house. As a result, the deck is more open and transparent a feature. Although the upper level awning is cantilevered within the 15m setback – the awning is a lightweight element that does not add any visual bulk to the building or have any visual impacts to neighbouring dwellings views. In comparison to the original approval, the element is more lightweight and open, resulting in amore sympathetic built form suited to the coastal environment.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 5 pages
Page 2
+8
®)
5
r®
= 92 = 98 iea4
pe
|
SITE BOUNDARY
/
/
/
a
1
cm 3250TOW |
SAK
‘onsTING ROAD
PuRaHCABus PARKING:
SURFACE TO LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTS OETA,
Z
3000
_ ee
ruarsreuevanns
waurroauvoon
sg \ abe senna
(BEACH)
APPROVED PLAN
MCU19/008.01
NOOSA COUNCIL :
9 AUGUST 2022
299 OVVYVYQVOO
Page 2 of 6
Page 3
3. Submit amended plans that comply with PO9 of the Low Density Residential
zone code. Provide an increased side boundary setback allowing for a
landscaped setback visible from the street to the rear of the site, allowing for
a continuation of a vegetated landscape and skyline.
4. Confirm whether the carport is intended to be enclosed and to what extent i.e., is
it a carport or garage.
5. Provide assessment against AO & PO 13 of the Zone Code.
6. Incorporate additional design elements to the front façade of the building as per
AO12.1 of the Zone Code.
Substantial amendments have been provided with the removal of the enclosed carport
and the increase width of the landscaping along the northern boundary with the public
beach access. The carport is finished with an open battening with vegetation and is
complementary with the adjoining Shaun Lockyer Designed building to the north and
the solid black wall and garage to the south, as shown below.
Page 3 of 6
Page 4
7. Submit amended plans that comply with AO9.4 of the Zone Code (a) (ii) and the
Queensland Development Code (QDC) A2 (d) (i).
8. Show both natural and finished ground levels relative to ground level on
elevation and section plans.
9. Provide revised plans in respect of the southern elevation to minimise the
appearance of bulk to adjacent property.
Amended plans are provided reducing the height and bulk of the southern ‘built to
boundary’ wall. The built to boundary wall adjoins the neighbouring solid blank wall. The
wall is slightly higher than the max 4.5m provision in the QDC requirements, however, is
appropriate in this instance owing to the size of the adjoining wall. The encroachment will
not have any amenity impacts and is less than 9m in length along the steeply sloping
elevation profile.
Page 4 of 6
Page 5
10. Please provide calculations to corroborate as per the Low Density Residential
Zone Code is to be measured per storey.
A ‘birds eye view’ site cover calculation is provided with the revised plan set demonstrating
a site coverage of 37% across all levels. The large landscaped setback to the coastal
boundary ensures the built form has a low site impact.
11. Provide an amended geotechnical report that certifies that the use of on-site
infiltration is suitable given the high landslide risk. The amended report must be
endorsed by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional
Engineer of Queensland).
12. Provide an Earthworks Plan demonstrating the extent of the proposed
earthworks required to carry out the proposed works. The additional plan must
be prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional
Engineer of Queensland) and include, but not be limited to:
a the extent and volume of cut and fill;
b construction methodology; and
c adhere to the recommendations made in Pacific Geotech’s Geotechnical
Stability Assessment (PG-2096).
Amended Geotechnical report recommendations are provided by Pacific Geotechnical
Engineers and an amended earthworks plan by SCG in accordance with this report.
Page 5 of 6
Page 6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the Development Assessment Rules, the applicant has given the assessment
manager the information requested. Please continue with your assessment in accordance
with the DA Rules. If you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not
hesitate to contact myself.
Regards,
Jack Lewis B.Sc Hons UNSW M.Plan Otago
Planner/Director
Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd
0406 334 227
Page 6 of 6
Used in these records
response to information request 22 arakoon.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.0 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.