Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Council archive · source document

Scg 31030(L2) · OPW22/0319

of 3

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Issue 3: Freeboard to Unity FFL’s

         Some of the nominated Unit FFLs have minimal elevation above the driveway levels and resulting surface
         stormwater flows. Consider improving the resilience of the units to local flooding by providing a step-up
         into the units from the carport and garage areas.

Response:
      There is adequate fall away from the dwelling to protect against stormwater inundation. The driveway
      level referred to by Council is at one location at the high side of the driveway and will not impact.

Issue 4: The applicant has not provided sufficient information to demonstrate compliance with Conditions
42-45 of MCU21/0083

         Provide the required Operational Waste Management Plan that demonstrates compliance with the
         conditions. The plan must include but not be limited to:
         4.1 Load rating on the underground tanks. Please note that refuse collection trucks weigh 23.5T
         4.2 The Location and number of 1100 litre bins
         4.3 The expected service levels (Refuse, Recycle and Garden)
         4.4 Clarification if the pedestrian shared zone has an awning and suitable horizontal and vertical
             clearances are available for the whole length of the refuse collection truck route within the site

Response:
   4.1 The water tank is specified to be trafficable on our plans. We don’t believe this should be a concern for
       Council as it becomes Council infrastructure.

4.2-4.3 Response by others.

    4.4 There is no overhang or impediment to vehicle movements along the pedestrian shared zone.

Issue 5: The submitted plans do not provide sufficient information to demonstrate how service provision
(i.e. the location of the Pad Mount Transformer, fire fighting booster pump, water, sewer, power, WSUD,
loading bays, waste bin storage etc) will impact on the provision of landscape areas to meet Performance
Outcomes PO1, PO2, PO3, P12 of the Landscape Code in relation to the sites general amenity, the
provision of shade and a sustainable outcome

       Provide a Consolidated Services Plan to demonstrate how the applicable Performance Outcomes can be
       achieved. This may include:
       5.1 A single overlayed plan to show areas of deep planting exclusive of services where trees are capable
           of being planted and allowed to grow to full form without management input (heavy pruning, removal,
           interference with infrastructure
       5.2 The location of the Pad Mount Transformer
       5.3 The location of the fire fighting booster pump

Response:
   5.1 By others.

5.2-5.3 Our understanding is there isn’t a requirement for a pad mount transformer of fire booster pump.

Issue 6: The submitted plans do not demonstrate compliance with a few of the conditions MCU21/0083

        Indicate on the plans the directional signage as described in Condition 27

Response:
      A directional sign has been shown on our revised plan attached.

Issue 7: Flooding

         Amend the relevant plans to indicate the 2m wide footpath as described in Condition 28




SCG Consulting Engineers                            Page 2 of 3                                   SCG Ref:31030(L1)


[OCR of page images]
Issue 3: Freeboard to Unity FFL’s

Some of the nominated Unit FFLs have minimal elevation above the driveway levels and resulting surface
stormwater flows. Consider improving the resilience of the units to local flooding by providing a step-up
into the units from the carport and garage areas.

Response:
There is adequate fall away from the dwelling to protect against stormwater inundation. The driveway

level referred to by Council is at one location at the high side of the driveway and will not impact.

Issue 4: The applicant has not provided sufficient information to demonstrate compliance with Conditions
42-45 of MCU21/0083

Provide the required Operational Waste Management Plan that demonstrates compliance with the

conditions. The plan must include but not be limited to:

4.1 Load rating on the underground tanks. Please note that refuse collection trucks weigh 23.5T

4.2 The Location and number of 1100 litre bins

4.3 The expected service levels (Refuse, Recycle and Garden)

4.4 Clarification if the pedestrian shared zone has an awning and suitable horizontal and vertical
clearances are available for the whole length of the refuse collection truck route within the site

Response:
4.1 The water tank is specified to be trafficable on our plans. We don’t believe this should be a concern for
Council as it becomes Council infrastructure.

4.2-4.3 Response by others.
4.4 There is no overhang or impediment to vehicle movements along the pedestrian shared zone.
Issue 5: The submitted plans do not provide sufficient information to demonstrate how service provision
(i.e. the location of the Pad Mount Transformer, fire fighting booster pump, water, sewer, power, WSUD,
loading bays, waste bin storage etc) will impact on the provision of landscape areas to meet Performance
Outcomes PO1, PO2, PO3, P12 of the Landscape Code in relation to the sites general amenity, the
provision of shade and a sustainable outcome
Provide a Consolidated Services Plan to demonstrate how the applicable Performance Outcomes can be
achieved. This may include:
5.1 A single overlayed plan to show areas of deep planting exclusive of services where trees are capable
of being planted and allowed to grow to full form without management input (heavy pruning, removal,
interference with infrastructure

5.2 The location of the Pad Mount Transformer
5.3 The location of the fire fighting booster pump

Response:
5.1 By others.

5.2-5.3 Our understanding is there isn’t a requirement for a pad mount transformer of fire booster pump.
Issue 6: The submitted plans do not demonstrate compliance with a few of the conditions MCU21/0083
Indicate on the plans the directional signage as described in Condition 27

Response:
A directional sign has been shown on our revised plan attached.

Issue 7: Flooding

Amend the relevant plans to indicate the 2m wide footpath as described in Condition 28

SCG Consulting Engineers Page 2 of 3 SCG Ref:31030(L1)

Used in these records

About this file

File size
483 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

SCG 31030(L2).pdf · 483 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.