Original source · versioned page text
Owner's Consent
From the archive Change Application.zip (folder Attachments), inside Change Application - OPW16/0203.01 - DA Form 5 - Cover Letter - Civil Drawings - Arborit Report - DTMR Correspondence - 19 Trading Post Road Cooroy - Palm Lake Stage 2. File date in the archive: 2021-09-02 15:26.
From: Anthony Wright <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, 11 January 2021 5:18 PM To: Monkeith Kadhum <[email protected]>; Conor Neville <[email protected]> Subject: RE: OPW20/0142 (MCU17/0551): TMR16-018981 & TMR16-018591 footpath separation Hi Monkeith / Conor, Please find attached the arborist assessment in relation to the above application as requested. Can you please confirm if the proposed revised alignment is acceptable based on the attached assessment? Regards, Anthony Wright | Senior Engineer - Transport P 07 5314 2520 | D +61 7 3517 4153 | M +61 448 165 114 | E [email protected] Level 4, Unit 401, 8 Market Lane, Maroochydore, QLD 4558 From: Monkeith Kadhum <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 13 November 2020 3:08 PM To: Anthony Wright <[email protected]> Subject: OPW20/0142 (MCU17/0551): TMR16-018981 & TMR16-018591 footpath separation Hi Anthony, Please find a comment from our Environment Officer regarding the sought change to the proposed alignment of the pathway. Would please provide satisfactory response to the information and details requested by Conor to enable to proceed with the assessment of the proposed works. Regards, Monkeith Kadhum Development Engineer I Environment Engineering Assessment I Noosa Council Phone: 07 5329 6293 Email: [email protected] Website: www.noosa.qld.gov.au Location: Level 3, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin Mail: PO Box 141 Tewantin Qld 4565 Find Council on Facebook From: Conor Neville <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 13 November 2020 1:02 PM To: Monkeith Kadhum <[email protected]> Subject: RE: OPW20/0142 (MCU17/0551): TMR16-018981 & TMR16-018591 footpath separation Hi Monkeith, The reason we were supportive of the original alignment was it preserved the vegetation buffer to the site. It appears the most recent alignment fails on this account. What trees are to be removed to accommodate their newest proposal? Can we get an arborist assessment of the proposal and details of the vegetative screening to be retained/enhanced please? regards Conor Neville 13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.