Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

Owner's Consent

From the archive Change Application.zip (folder Attachments), inside Change Application - OPW16/0203.01 - DA Form 5 - Cover Letter - Civil Drawings - Arborit Report - DTMR Correspondence - 19 Trading Post Road Cooroy - Palm Lake Stage 2. File date in the archive: 2021-09-02 15:26.

of 19

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

From: Anthony Wright <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, 11 January 2021 5:18 PM
To: Monkeith Kadhum <[email protected]>; Conor Neville <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: OPW20/0142 (MCU17/0551): TMR16-018981 & TMR16-018591 footpath separation

Hi Monkeith / Conor,

Please find attached the arborist assessment in relation to the above application as requested. Can you please
confirm if the proposed revised alignment is acceptable based on the attached assessment?

Regards,

Anthony Wright | Senior Engineer - Transport
P 07 5314 2520 | D +61 7 3517 4153 | M +61 448 165 114 | E [email protected]
Level 4, Unit 401, 8 Market Lane, Maroochydore, QLD 4558



From: Monkeith Kadhum <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, 13 November 2020 3:08 PM
To: Anthony Wright <[email protected]>
Subject: OPW20/0142 (MCU17/0551): TMR16-018981 & TMR16-018591 footpath separation

Hi Anthony,
Please find a comment from our Environment Officer regarding the sought change to the proposed
alignment of the pathway.
Would please provide satisfactory response to the information and details requested by Conor to enable to
proceed with the assessment of the proposed works.
Regards,

Monkeith Kadhum
Development Engineer I Environment Engineering Assessment I Noosa Council

Phone:        07 5329 6293
Email:      [email protected]
Website:    www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Location:   Level 3, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin
Mail:       PO Box 141 Tewantin Qld 4565
             Find Council on Facebook




From: Conor Neville <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, 13 November 2020 1:02 PM
To: Monkeith Kadhum <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: OPW20/0142 (MCU17/0551): TMR16-018981 & TMR16-018591 footpath separation

Hi Monkeith,
The reason we were supportive of the original alignment was it preserved the vegetation buffer to the site.
It appears the most recent alignment fails on this account.

What trees are to be removed to accommodate their newest proposal? Can we get an arborist assessment
of the proposal and details of the vegetative screening to be retained/enhanced please?

regards

Conor Neville
                                                           13
Log in to download the original file

Owner's Consent.pdf · 153 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.