ECM_21734524_v3_Decision Notice - Approved by Delegation of Authority MCU21 0150

                                       Page 11 of 17
Document Set ID: 21734524
Version: 3, Version Date: 22/12/2021


[OCR of page images]
2103-24975 SRA

Attachment 3—Reasons for referral agency response
(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)

 

The reasons for the SARA's decision are:

The development complies with State Code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment of the

SDAP. Specifically, the development:

« does not create a safety hazard for users of a state-controlled road

* does not compromise the structural integrity of state-controlled roads, road transport infrastructure or
road works

« does not result in a worsening of the physical condition or operating performance of state-controlled
toads and the surrounding road network

* does not compromise the state's ability to construct, or significantly increase the cost to construct
state-controlled roads and future state-controlled roads

* does not compromise the state's ability to maintain and operate state-controlled roads, or significantly
increase the cost to maintain and operate state-controlled roads

« does not compromise the structural integrity of public passenger transport infrastructure or
compromise the operating performance of public passenger transport services

« avoids or mitigates significant adverse impacts resulting from environmental emissions generated by
vehicles on the state-controlled road.

Material used in the assessment of the application:

The development application material and submitted plans
Planning Act 2016

Planning Regulation 2017

The SDAP (version 2.6), as published by the SARA

The Development Assessment Rules

SARA DA Mapping system

Human Rights Act 2019

State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 5 of 7

Document Set ID: 21653734
Version: 1, Version Date: 21/10/2021

Document Set ID: 21734524 Page 11 of 17

Version: 3, Version Date: 22/12/2021