Original source · versioned page text
2017-06-06 - P&E Agenda Attachment 1 to Item 6 Draft Alignment Amendments Part 1 (Pages 1-907)
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (18.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
iii. Tables 6.1 to 6.11—Cooroy & Lake Macdonald Locality;
Including amendments to 3 July 2017
iv. Tables 7.1 to 7.10 —Eastern Beaches Locality;
The Noosa Plan
v. Tables 8.1 to 8.10—Mary River Catchment Locality;
vi. Tables 9.1 to 9.10—Noosa Heads Locality;
vii. Tables 10.1 to 10.7—Noosa North Shore Locality;
viii. Tables 11.1 to 11.12—Noosaville Locality;
ix. Tables 12.1 to 12.11—Tewantin & Doonan Locality;
x. Table 13.1—Biodiversity Overlay;
xi. Tables 13.3 to 13.4—Heritage Overlay; and
xii. Tables 13.6 to 13.7—Natural Hazards and Natural Resources Overlays.
Editor’s note—Section 43 of the Planning Act 2016 identifies that a categorising instrument categorises
development and specifies categories of assessment and may be a regulation or local categorising
instrument. A local categorising instrument includes a planning scheme, a TLPI or a variation approval.
2.6.1 The assessment tables also identify assessable development that requires code assessment
or impact assessment for the purpose of Part 5 of Chapter 3 of IPA.
2.5.2 Hierarchy of assessment benchmarks
Where there is inconsistency between provisions in the planning scheme, the following rules
apply:
a) the strategic framework and desired environmental outcomes prevail over all other
components to the extent of the inconsistency for impact assessment;
b) relevant codes as specified in schedules 6, 7 and 10 of the Regulation prevail over all
other components to the extent of the inconsistency;
c) overlays prevail over all other components (other than the matters mentioned in (a)
and (b) to the extent of the inconsistency;
d) locality codes prevail over use codes, works code and other development codes (other
than an overlay code) to the extent of the inconsistency.
2.6.2 If development is identified as having a different assessment category under a zone or
under an assessment table for development other than material change of use, than
under an overlay, or under different overlays, the higher assessment category applies as
follows—
self-assessable prevails over exempt;
code assessable prevails over self-assessable or exempt; and
impact assessable prevails over code assessable, self-assessable or exempt.
2.6 Tables of assessment
The Assessment Tables in Parts 4 –13 identify the category of development, and the
category of assessment and assessment benchmarks for assessable development in the
planning scheme area.
2-4
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.