Original source · versioned page text
2015-10-13 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
AGENDA
Infrastructure & Services
Committee Meeting
Tuesday, 13 October 2015
commencing at 9.00am
Committee Room, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin
Committee: Crs Sandy Bolton (Chair), Bob Abbot, Frank Pardon, Noel Playford
“Engagement with our community to protect and enhance our lifestyle”
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 24 sections
Section 2
INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 13 OCTOBER 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGE
ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES -
PRESENTATIONS -
PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE DEPARTMENT REPORTS 3
Infrastructure Planning & Design 3
1 NOOSA COUNCIL TRAFFIC ADVISORY AND SPEED MANAGEMENT
COMMITTEE, AUGUST 2015 3
2 ADOPTION OF ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANS 8
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORTS -
CLOSED SESSION -
Page 2 of 25
Section 3
INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 13 OCTOBER 2015
PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE DEPARTMENT REPORTS
(Infrastructure Services only)
Infrastructure Planning & Design
1 NOOSA COUNCIL TRAFFIC ADVISORY AND SPEED MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE,
AUGUST 2015
DOCUMENT INFORM AT ION
Author Technical Officer – Transport & Traffic, Lewis Moes
Planning & Infrastructure Department
Index ECM/Subject/Traffic Management/Speed Management Committee
ECM/Subject/Traffic Management/Traffic Advisory Committee
Attachments 1. Action Matrix
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Not applicable.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Technical Officer - Transport & Traffic to the Infrastructure &
Services Committee Meeting dated 13 October 2015 detailing the key outcomes of the Noosa
Traffic Advisory Committee and Speed Management Committee meeting dated 27 August 2015.
REPORT
The purpose of this report is to update Council on the key outcomes of the Noosa Traffic Advisory
and Speed Management Committee meeting held on 27 August 2015.
At the meeting, no decisions were made however there were a number of traffic related issues
discussed with the Committee noting that numerous traffic investigations were still being
undertaken before any final conclusions could be made. The current issues are listed in the Action
Matrix included in Attachment 1.
Previous Council Consideration
Nil.
Finance & Risk
There are ongoing costs associated with traffic investigations in order to ensure a safe road
environment for our community. In most cases safety improvements determined from these
investigations will be funded from operational budgets or referred for consideration in future budget
deliberations.
Page 3 of 25
Section 4
INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 13 OCTOBER 2015
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Qld Department of Transport and Main Roads (Road Operations and Road Safety)
Qld Police Service
Internal Consultation
Nil.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Community Services x Planning & Infrastructure
Disaster Management & Public Order Building & Plumbing Services
Waste & Environmental Health DA Planning
Community Facilities Strategic Land Use Planning
Cultural Facilities X Asset Design & Investigations
Asset Planning
Civil Operations
Environment
Executive Office Corporate Services
Community Engagement Finance
Customer Service ICT
Executive Support Procurement & Fleet
Governance Property & Facilities
Human Resources Revenue Services
Page 4 of 25
Section 5
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 5 of 25
ATTACHMENT 1
Mm MENfeleLe = Traffic Advisory Committee (TAC) & Speed Management Committee (SMC)
m mreeeers Action Matrix
As of 27/8/2015
No. Meeting ta) STN T=) Actions & Notes Who Otter -ta
BFA) No. Status
fl. 13/2/2014 22 Hasting Street - Segway Use e Noosa Police will continue to use Segway’s in their Council Completed
ee : area of operation until further notice. Council don’t (Scott)
Se saiaiacien, eg a support the use of them but understand QPS has
the right too.
2. 15/5/2014 2.13 Black Mountain Range Road - Council e Council (Lewis) presented the speed limit review to Council Ongoing
Speed Reviews the committee with the recommendation that the (Lewis)
Speed reviews generated from customer speed limit remain at eOkmi, Sommittes
‘cniect reanrdite speeding and requests to supported the speed limit review and agreed DTMR
lower the speed limits. Customer requests further investigation is needed into curve warning (Dan)
(RM2014/04481 12366 & 00432) and advisory speed signs for that section of road,
: which will be presented at the next committee
meeting.
e DTMR (Dan) has agreed to assist Council in their
review of the road with the use of the vericom
computer and software to determine the
appropriate signage.
3. 5/3/2015 4.5 Weyba Rd Noosaville — speed limit on e Council (Scott & Nick) have met with event Council Ongoing
market day organisers who will produce a new traffic (Scott & Nick)
Merits of variable speed limit signage fronting rishiagernere plan to deal with speed, parking and
the Farmers Market on Sunday mornings 6am pedestrian movements along Weyba Road.
— 1.00pm Council waiting on new plan to review and present
‘ at a future committee meeting.
5/3/2015 534 Mill Street & Summit Road, Pomona e Council (Lewis) has completed a project initiation to Council Completed
Intersection review/upgrade of the current left- upgrade the intersection which will be included for (Lewis)
in/left-out to a standard T-intersection future: budget considerations,
18/6/2015 3.2 Moorhen Place, Noosaville e Council (Lewis) has presented a revised plan of the Council Completed
Clistonier Peauiest forthe speed to be proposed 40kn/h area in Doonella Estate to (Lewis)
Kavlawor 7 4 anna ae a ee isincart ince include the intersection with Beckmans Road.
in tha'ateate come) gnag Committee endorsed the new plan and signage
Py changes.
Page 1 of 3
Page 5 of 25Section 6
Page 6 of 25
18/6/2015 3.4 Hill Street, Pomona ¢ Council (Scott & Nick) to investigate development Council Ongoing
ere : application and produce a plan to present and (Scott & Nick)
Proposed development application with . : :
poestbe Teron rodeala with Subway discuss at the DTMR (Leah McKenzie) / Council
Mian working group.
VA 18/6/2015 3.5 Eumundi Noosa Rd, Noosaville e Council (Scott & Nick) to tie the project into the Council Completed
: 3 Beckmans Road duplication discussions with (Scott & Nick)
Sr ae ie ftan-ctoseing DTMR, will advise committee once there is an
pone Y 9 outcome.
18/6/2015 3.6 Eenie Creek Rd/Reef St Noosaville ¢ QPS (Steve) presented crash details of 2 reported Council Ongoing
Roundabout crashed in the last year. The committee agreed for | (Lewis & Scott)
Customer concerned with pavement of the Council (Lewis & Scott) to do a visual inspection of
rouandabout and wants Council to investigate the roundabout and ai60 GBcuss and check with
éraches: Lewis to. discuss with Police Council’s road construction engineers.
WebCrash details
18/6/2015 3.7 Cooroy Township ¢ Council (Scott & Nick) to tie in project with future Council Ongoing
Pedestrian accessibility from east to west upgrade of the intersection of Diamond & Elm (Scott & Nick)
across railway line and improved pedestrian Street and discussions with DTMR.
crossing points in town e QPS (Mal) discussed the request from local
residents to investigate the main pedestrian
crossing in town for possible improvements.
Council (Nick) is investigating upgrades and has
scope for a project in the new calendar year.
10. 18/6/2015 3.8 Middle Creek Rd Federal e Committee discussed this item further and DTMR Council Ongoing
Reduction in speed limit (from 80km/h to (Dan) has agreed to assist Council with reviewing (Lewis)
6Okm/h). This road has had several fatal the current road safety audit done by RoadPro and
anal dents in the last 3 years and is normally a look at the most feasible outcomes with regards to DTMR
quiet country road but is unmarked, with blind signage and line marking solutions as quick wins. (Dan)
semners: : Council (Lewis) to send a copy of the audit to
DTMR.
11. 27/8/2015 34 David Low Way, Castaways Beach ¢ Council (Lewis & Scott) to develop concept plans Council Ongoing
Aitaie ruiices ak eradhes ie ersnor ie and a project brief for the forward planning and (Lewis & Scott)
beach accesses, Council are looking at design program eo improve pedestian Ronnectona,
improving pedestrian connections, bus stops bus stop facilities, parking, line marking, signage
arkiie and tuming moverients : : and traffic management. Plans will be presented at
P 9 9 : a future committee meeting.
Page 2 of 3
Page 6 of 25Section 7
Page 7 of 25
12. 27/8/2015 32 Station Road, Pomona — Pomona State e Council (Lewis) to develop concept plans and a Council Ongoing
School project brief for the forward planning and design (Lewis)
A request from the school and the P&C to program to improve traffic congestion, bus
improve parking and traffic congestion turnaround movements, pedestrian footpath access
problems in front of Pomona State School and parking in front of the Pomona State School.
, Plans will be presented at a future committee
meeting.
13. 27/8/2015 345 Cooroy Connection Road (Elm Street), e DTMR (Dan) agreed to investigate the current DTMR Ongoing
Cooroy speed limit of the Yurol Forest Road intersection (Dan)
DTMR has conducted a speed limit review of further and have a discussion with the Cooroy-
Cooroy Connection Road, Cooroy with the Curra project team about the highway off ramp.
Geileccitnaa Or thes taulanr ts failace the speed DTMR (Dan) will present the speed limit review at
limit from 100kmv/h to 90kmi/h. SE EES AS
14. 27/8/2015 4.1 Alyxia Street, Noosaville e Council (Lewis) to advise the school of this and Council Ongoing
QPS has had a number of requests from the also discuss with Council’s DA area about (Lewis)
public about the amount of school people approval. Council (Lewis) to produce the plans for
siting in thin ebeut the new yellow line marking on each side of the
P g : road at the bend near the first houses from a road
safety point of view. The new works will be carried
out by Council.
15. 27/8/2015 4.2 Cedar Street, Cooroy e Council (Lewis) to produce the plans for the Council Ongoing
‘ “ maintenance of existing yellow line marking in (Lewis)
oe eae i ere tae 04 ete arking Cedar Street. These works will be carried out by
maintenance. Count
16. 27/8/2015 4.4 Informing the public of road rules e QPS (Steve) to discuss possible campaign with QPS Ongoing
Council wanted to raise the point of informing media about a reminder to the public about the (Steve)
the oliblic ‘about the basic road fules basic road rules in particular roundabouts in the
Sn with recards to roundabouts Noosa area. DTMR (Leanne) will provide Council DTMR
p Y 9 F with a number of road rule refresher brochures for (Leanne)
distribution to the public.
Page 3 of 3
Page 7 of 25Section 8
INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 13 OCTOBER 2015
2 ADOPTION OF ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANS
DOCUMENT INFORM AT ION
Author Infrastructure Planning & Design Manager, Nicholas Wellwood
Asset Planning Coordinator, Bryan O’Connor
Planning & Infrastructure Department
Index ECM/Subject/Asset Management
Attachments 1. Asset Management Plans
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Not applicable.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Infrastructure Planning & Design Manager and the Asset
Planning Coordinator to the Infrastructure & Services Committee Meeting dated 13 October 2015
and adopt the following Asset Management Plans:
A. Bridges Asset Management Plan;
B. Building & Facilities Asset Management Plan;
C. Foreshore Asset Management Plan;
D. Parks, Playgrounds & Reserves Asset Management Plan;
E. Pathways & Boardwalks Asset Management Plan;
F. Roads & Carparks Asset Management Plan;
G. Stormwater Asset Management Plan; and
H. Waste Infrastructure Asset Management Plan.
REPORT
The development of Asset Management Plans is one of the fundamental building blocks of good
asset management practice. These plans have been developed to align with Council’s Corporate
Plan Strategic Goal of Looking after community assets and are a key focus area of the Corporate
Plan.
1. Executive overview
The following table provides a snapshot of Council’s major asset classes.
Asset class Current Level of Confidence description
replacement confidence in 1 – very high level of confidence
2 – high level of confidence
cost asset condition
3 – moderate level of confidence
data 4 – low level of confidence
5 – very low level of confidence
Roads & Carparks $427.6m 3 moderate
Stormwater $149.5m 5 very low
Bridges $107.5m 3 moderate
Buildings & Facilities $74.6m 5 very low
Pathways & Boardwalks $44.4m 3-4 low to moderate
Parks, Playgrounds & Reserves $28.4m 3-4 low to moderate
Foreshore $12.5m 3 moderate
TOTAL $844.5m
Page 8 of 25
Section 9
INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 13 OCTOBER 2015
Asset class risks have been identified and where confidence in the condition data is at its lowest,
the risks increase.
The data available to inform the ongoing development of the Asset Management Plans varies, and
ongoing work will be required to build a complete picture of Council’s assets. This ongoing program
of data collection will increase confidence and knowledge of Council’s asset condition and is vital
for completion of 5 and 10 year Capital Works Programs.
2. Next steps in asset management planning
The development of an over-arching asset management strategy will be necessary in order to align
with the Asset Management Policy and Noosa Council Corporate Plan. This document will be
presented to Infrastructure & Services Committee in November for approval.
More detailed Asset Management Plans will be developed following comprehensive inspections
and data collection to provide information on individual assets. Long term Total Asset Management
Plans are proposed that will further break down assets into individual elements.
3. Review of Asset Management Plans
The Asset Management Plans will be reviewed annually and presented to Council for adoption.
Previous Council Consideration
Nil.
Finance & Risk
Funding will be required for the completion of detailed Asset Management Plans, preventive
maintenance and the 5 and 10 year capital renewal plans. This will be the subject of a budget
initiative in the 2016/17 budget
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Nil.
Internal Consultation
Council’s Asset Management Team.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
X Community Services X Planning & Infrastructure
Disaster Management & Public Order Building & Plumbing Services
Waste & Environmental Health DA Planning
Community Facilities Strategic Land Use Planning
Cultural Facilities Asset Design & Investigations
X Asset Planning
Civil Operations
Environment
X Executive Office X Corporate Services
Community Engagement Finance
Customer Service ICT
Executive Support Procurement & Fleet
Governance Property & Facilities
Human Resources Revenue Services
Page 9 of 25
Section 10
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 10 of 25
Se ATTACHMENT 1
«yf 9/ =) ay y = a. yeieiai? ee
a MENLO ROCCE ae Sec
=m S :
a Oe
Overview te
Non-contemporary construction techniques and — aa
inferior materials in a marine environment have gf . ‘ a
resulted in four bridges requiring significant os c ge |
rehabilitation after only 40 years of use. There mH af Za /
are also a number of timber bridges reaching ius a. 7 = | | all
the end of useful life. Proactive level 1 and 2 J ———— —
. a * " ,
inspections are undertaken on the bridge —"
network, however data needs to be captured on — se
the asset system to increase confidence in o
knowledge of asset condition.
Total number of road and pedestrian bridges = 183
Current replacement cost = $107.5m Age profile ; :
Current written down value = $80.8m Bridges have one of the highest useful lives of
2014/15 depreciation of $1.45m Council's assets and can last up to 100 years.
2014/15 maintenance = $ 588k There are two timber bridges that are over 90
2015/16 capital renewal program $ 2.8m years old, being Ringtail Creek Road pedestrian
Critical assets — Monks Bridge, Girraween Bridge, bridge and Kidd Road Pomona Road.
Munna Point Bridge, Sheraton Bridgéy E@nie Creek Thelturrent age)profile in the graph below
See —s Byealla highlights the significant investment in bridges
y ve throughoutthe 1990’s and the early 2000s. This
was a result of new developments around Noosa
Waters, the de-maining of David Low Way, which
: has two major bridges, and the construction of the
» Noosa arterial road network with three major
5 Me ; bridges constructed: Monks Bridge, Girraween
This first generation asset management plan Bridge and Eenie Creek Bridge
provides an initial snapshot of Noosa Council's Itisi f hi ; file th f
Bridge assets and infrastructure. Through this tis Important to note from this profile that some :o
plan, major risks and priorities will be identified the bridges may need to be re-valued individually
through the improvement of asset management as the civil construction costs have greatly
practices. In the future, the development of next increased over the years and the current
generation asset management plans will provide replacement costs may be undervalued
far greater detail. ,
The Bridge assets consist of road bridges and
pedestrian bridges only. There are 50 Road
bridges owned and operated by Noosa council and =
a further 133 pedestrian bridges that are located & 4
within parks, reserves and road corridors. «=> Asset Age Profile
#8
= 00,000
e
=
3 50,000
0 aban “i of * a | | a%
Ny © OAV AM 9 20 64.59 00 VO AY
vo? NEV 6060 oO CODD Oey
PPIDI PIII SSSA
Year Acquired
Document Set ID: 19961827
Version: 5, Version Date: 01/10/2015
Page 10 of 25Section 11
Page 11 of 25
RISKS Sie
. ag Asset condition
1. Asset deterioration and structural failure; : ~
2 Pp tructi techni 4 ined The level of confidence in asset condition data for
Sue Sone Us UES, one ieee bridges is higher than most other asset classes due
materials; to the proactive level 1 and level 2 inspections.
3. Contributed assets not meeting the required These are cyclical inspections which can escalate to
levels of service or fit for purpose; a level 3 structural inspection should a level of
4. Disaster events such as flooding, storm. defects be reached.
While Council undertakes level 1 through to 3
inspections these have not consistently recorded the
individual overall asset condition score. Based on the
below 1 to 5 rating for each bridge across the
network, the current condition profile in the graph
below is based on an aged base condition rather than
Asset renewal physical condition. The first improvement in condition
Although the existing renewal activities are a data is to record the 1 to 5 ratings of all bridges and
result of asset failure and defect detection, the record them.
development of a renewal programme will E
improve the capability of predicting suitable
intervention timeframes. [ETE OTE
1 Very Good Condition ;
Currently there are four concrete bridges that - Bier Cetce Date Ts a
need rehabilitation or replacement over the next slisionadiea agai Xo teats —
two to three years. The highest priority bridge of 3 Level of Service Ps ,
these four is Munna Point Bridge which is a Lapa
concrete road bridge built in the late 1970's. Dp ipeeatbevde tee beeen
Poor construction techniques and inferior 5 Raerineryicte se ae ex oes
? ss . F set requires replaceme: hs
materials used for a marine environment bridge The Physical Asset Condition is measured using the “core asset
has seen this bridge and others reach end of life management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the IIMM,
nearly 40 years early. This bridge is currently International Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being used
being rehabilitated. The remaining three bridges, for the majonty of Council's infrastructure.
Sheraton Bridge, Doonella Bridge and Witta
Circuit Bridge, were all constructed in the same
decade and are currently being investigated for
potential defects and deterioration. 5
wo eae .
There are a number of timber bridges that are - Age Based Condition Profile
reaching the end of life with the Old Noosa Road 4% 100,000
Bridge the highest priority, and will. require = a
replacement in the next two to three years. In o
addition there are approximately $10m worth of 5 50,000
bridges requiring replacement or rehabilitation 2
over the next 10 years. a a
0 cae -_
1 2 3 4 5
Condition Rating
Improvement Plan
1. Continue with cyclical level 1 and 2 inspections across all bridge assets with results and overall bridge
asset condition recorded in asset system;
2. Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and Inspection data to have a single point of truth for bridge
assets within the asset system;
3. Develop along term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset
‘ deterioration modelling;
| 4. Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
specific to bridge deck, abutments, headstocks, pylons etc.
\ 5. Undertake valuations on individual bridges to determine bridge values.
NOOSA COUNCIL PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
t Set 1D: 199618; TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qlid.gov.au
Page 11 of 25Section 12
Page 12 of 25
a etna = - Tne — ay hed =
7 4 mel -— oc : aS 7 —= SS we os aig sf bs to . -
r . 5 —— etn ao ere nay —
qe eo) 1%: | ) ™~ . . TT <e ar “% Tt —- sgecoay Sy shies
gt MENLO COON CIE ae a —
am 4
* z aoe
Overview .
Council's buildings and facilities have a high
community profile and the major risk to these Sa HI —
assets is deterioration and structural failure. )— == ae
Very little data exists on the condition of } vel ae a
Council’s building and facilities assets, however tis i mer ae OZ
physical asset condition assessments TOR Sena A es,
commenced in early 2015. This information Stray Dye
once collected will be collated into the asset -
system. While current renewal activities result : =
primarily from asset failure and defect __
detection, the development of a prioritised
renewal programme is desirable.
Total buildings and facilities assets = 234 .
Current replacement cost = $ 74.6m Age profile =
Current written down value = $ 59.3m While there are a number of buildings that were
2014/15 d iati £$22 built more than 40 years ago, it was the period
me eSrey ene $ 2.2m of the 1970s, 1990s and early 2000s that
2014/15 maintenance expenses = $ 697k witnessed the greatest increase in the value of
2015/16 capital renewal program $ 604k assets. These included the Tewantin office
Critical assets — Council offices and depots, building, the Aquatic Centre, Noosa Leisure
Libraries, Noosa Aquatic Centre, Noosa Leisure ae ae dhe ie a hada fie Girraween
Centre, The J, community halls and buildings, P 9 P Y 7”
and public amenities. Understanding the age profile will assist in the
planning for these assets into the future, to
inform requirements for mid-life rehabilitation or
renewal. Knowing when to intervene prior to the
assets failing, or whether they are able to go
This first generation asset management plan beyond their life expectancy is the challenge for
provides an initial snapshot of Council's buildings asset managers. The assets ages are the first
and facilities infrastructure. Through this plan, step in prioritising which assets should be
major risks and priorities will be identified through prioritised for condition assessment.
the improvement of asset management practices.
In the future, the development of second
generation asset management plans will provide
far greater detail.
ou .
Buildings and facilities assets include a diverse 3 Asset Age Profile
range of infrastructure, including but not limited to: Pe
offices and depots, Noosa Aquatic Centre, 2 220,000
community facilities (including halls and galleries), < 5
The J, libraries, public amenities and sporting club = “10,000
premises. This asset management plan also 5 | ' = ltl
includes the fittings and fixtures that support these o ea oe
facilities such such as CCTV systems, electrical RoaeReSRSaRESsSas
switchboards, air conditioning and fire systems. SSSI Ae aR aN
Year Acquired
Document Set ID: 19961833
Version: 6, Version Date: 01/10/2015
Page 12 of 25Section 13
Page 13 of 25
RISKS %
1. Asset deterioration and structural failure; Asset condition
2. Contributed assets not meeting the The level of confidence in asset condition data for
required levels of service or being fit for buildings and facilities infrastructure is very low. The
: current asset conditions utilised in this plan are
poloem, wid : : determined on an “aged based” calculation and
3. Buildings and facilities not compliant with therefore do not reflect their true physical condition.
current regulations and standards;
4. Disaster events such as fire, flood and, In addition to using a “desktop” based calculation to
storm: determine the asset condition, there will also be
5 Mali 5 Macks h denies inaccuracies due to factors which may further
: Penns See ee ae Sane understate the actual condition of buildings and
and facilities assets. The condition profile reflected in the
6. A lack of condition knowledge across the adjacent graph indicates that, generally, assets are
network contributing to __ ill-informed not that old and only a small number of assets are
decisions. close to the end of their expected life.
The first major improvement in asset management
activities for this asset class is to undertake physical
= asset condition assessments. Once this is completed,
o - .
S Hr a mofe detailed assessment of future renewal
a Age Based Condition investments Cambe made and integrated into
g Profile financial planning.
o
= The physical condition assessments commenced in
g9,000 early 2015 and the resultsiof these condition
30,000 assessments, will be compiled,within the asset
& system to’ assist in developing maintenance and
= 0,000 renewal programs into the future.
“10,000
0 i Assessment
1 2 3 4 5 [EET OEP ToT
4 Very Good Condition
Condition Rating Only normal mainetnance required
2 Minor Defects Only
Minor maintenance required (5%)
Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
= 7 3 Level of Service
Significant maintenance required (10-20%)
Asset renewal 4 Requires Renewal
nr 2 oo : Significant renewal/upgrade required (20-40%)
Although existing renewal activities are primarily as | 5 Asset Unserviceable
a result of asset failure and defectidetection, the Over 50% of Asset requires replacement 4
development of arenewal programme will improve The Physical Asset Condition is measured using the “core asset
a sti ata i nti management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the |IMM,
the capability of predicting appropriate intervention International Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being used
timeframes. for the majority of Council's infrastructure until more advanced
asset management practices are considered.
There are no major (greater than $500k) renewals
proposed for buildings and facilities assets in the
current 5 year capital programme.
Improvement Plan
1. Finalise physical asset condition assessments across all buildings and facilities assets;
2. Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and inspection data to ensure a single point of truth for asset data
within the asset system;
3. Develop a long term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset
4 deterioration modelling;
7 4. Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
specific to libraries, in more detail.
NOOSA COUNCIL PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
“Set iD: 199618: TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 13 of 25Section 14
Page 14 of 25
> Se iL oo nena: seg | = ee "i ihe a
“a = si ce es ~~ aa
jefe} NOOSA COUNCIL Riese er
a
a 5 -
a. -_
. o FN Se. 3
Overview ee
A programme of recent physical asset condition , Fe) ——-
assessments, has improved confidence in the er aii aeaaue
knowledge of the condition of these assets and i
are rated as moderate. Many of these assets = ———
are in harsh environments on infrastructure, . =
therefore a higher risk of asset deterioration or
structure failure. Frequent cyclical inspections . ae
and the development of a long term asset FY ‘— A
renewal programme are therefore desirable. :
Total number of foreshore assets = 63 — ~
Current replacement costs = $12.5m See:
Current written down value = $ 9.8m / Age profile
2014/15 maintenance = $ 264k The asset age profile indicates that foreshore
201415 — of $ 362k ii; infrastructure is still in the early stages of useful
SU VSrTS Cepien tenes Pee Saale . Mlife. The aeqlisition of the Noosa Waters lock and
oe . ' weir Was the first major asset added in 1993. In
Critical assets —Noosa Maia Beach sand "i ~ the last 5 years other major infrastructure
pumping system, Noosa Waters, lock and weir, including the Noosa Main Beach sand pump and
Noosa River revetment wails: is, . the construction of the Noosa spit revetment
= J walls for the dog beach, have raised the value of
iar ™ . = _ the foreshore infrastructure.
= While these assets are at the early stages of their
This first generation asset management plan useful lives it is important to continue to monitor
provides an initial snapshot of Council’s Foreshore and assess condition and where required
assets and infrastructure. Through this plan major undertake appropriate maintenance activities to
risks and priorities will be identified through the ensure these assets reach their full life potential.
improvement of asset management practices. In
the future, the development of next generation
asset management plans will provide far greater
detail. =
3 :
Foreshore assets include but are not limited to: = Asset Age Profile
jetties, pontoons, Noosa Waters lock and weir, 3s 000
main beach sand pumping facilities and shoreline - :
protection. The next generation asset 4,000
beach access assets and more revetment walls £2,000 | |
management plans will be expanded to include 2
and groynes. 3 o- a 5 = a
PIII FSSC OSs
Year Acquired
DocumentSet1D:-19961830
Version: 6, Version Date: 01/10/2015
Page 14 of 25Section 15
Page 15 of 25
RISKS Asset condition
Jy wage , : The level of confidence in the asset condition for
1. Asset deterioration and structural failure; : 7
; foreshore infrastructure is moderate. The current
2. Disaster events such as storm surge; asset conditions utilised in this plan are determined
3. Malicious attacks such as vandalism; and from an “aged based” calculation and therefore do
4. A lack of condition knowledge across the not reflect their true physical condition.
network contributing to _ ill-informed :
dseisi Unlike other asset classes, the foreshore
ecisions. : :
infrastructure assets have had physical asset
condition assessments on a number of the foreshore
asset types including revetment walls, jetties,
pontoons, pump station, lock and weir. As a result,
cyclical maintenance and renewal activities have
3 been developed for the lock and weir and the Noosa
a Age Base Condition Main Beach pump stations.
S eas . ;
a
2 Profile Recently, inspection routines have been developed
@ - : : :
2 for the capture and condition assessment of
® revetment walls. This improvement initiative ensures
< 10,000 that these asset classes can be sustainably
€ maintained, renewed and rehabilitated for their
= 5,000 remaining useful life.
a
0 Perils
[ET SAT
Good Condition
td 2, BS Ss OS fn See
Condition Rating gE cee el ae
Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
3 Level of Service
Significant maintenance required (10-20%)
4 Requires Renewal
Significant renewal/upgrade required (20-40%)
5 Asset Unserviceable
Over 50% of Asset requires replacement :
The Physical Asset Condition is measured using the “core asset
Asset renewal management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the IIMM,
The existing renewal activities are a result of International Edition 2011. This isa universal approach being used
, : i" : . f for the majority of Council's infrastructure until more advanced
cyclical inspections which have identified asset asset management practices are considered.
deterioration and defects. The development of a
renewal programme through physical asset Foreshore assets are very dynamic insofar as their
condition assessments will improve the capability ability to be fit for purpose and can be affected by
of predicting suitable intervention timeframes environmental impacts such as storm events as well
before asset failures. as activities that are man-made such as boat wash.
; Council is committed to maintaining these assets to
There are no major (>$500k) renewals proposed ensure that the beaches, waterways and adjacent
for foreshore assets in the current 5 year capital properties that these assets service do not impact on
programme. However, there are cyclical the community facilities and services they support.
renewals programmed for the Noosa Waters lock
and weir assets.
Improvement Plan
1. Develop physical asset condition assessments across all foreshore assets;
2. Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and Inspection data to ensure a single point of truth for asset data
within the asset system;
_ 3. Develop a long term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset
y deterioration modelling;
‘ 4. Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
specific to beach accesses, jetties, pontoons, lock and weir, sand pump station and revetment walls.
NOOSA COUNCIL PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
t Set iD; 199618: TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 15 of 25Section 16
Page 16 of 25
, ia ae lf F =
ere ig eS gansta bm oe a — al
as ae elie eee
a MENLO OCONEE ae Seats
= §
Overview a:
Assets with high use represent a public liability ——— °
risk to Council if there is deterioration or if ; 7 we
structural failure. A regime of compliance risk sw ¢ ae
i fen ¥ ; rf |
inspections is undertaken, however data needs iS i Nt oak
to be captured to increase confidence in the Ale. et : sTrT sae Lee
knowledge of asset condition from the current 5 oe j= ee =
low to moderate level. ~ S e _
Renewal of these assets is currently reactive 4 ’ :
and based on defects detected during routine rial a ty ;
inspections. A prioritised approach to renewals d ad oe
is more desirable.
Total number of assets = 1697
Current written down value = $22.8m
Current replacement cost = $28.4m Age profile
2014/15 depreciation costs = $ 853k In analysing the age profile for parks,
2014/15 maintenance costs = $ 2.25m playground and reserve infrastructure the first
2015/16 capital renewal program $ 311k observation within the profile is the significant
Critical assets — playground equipment, asset value for 2005.
landscaping, nature reserves@nd foreshore In 2005:a proactive asset data collection
parks programme was for collecting park furniture,
> playground and park assets. The majority of the
assets identified had the acquisition date of the
_ year it was captured recorded. This approach
This first generation asset management plan ‘does not reflect the true age of 75% (1,278) of
rovides an initial snapshot of Council’s parks lpeapesieniees
P P "7 . The majority of these assets are lower valued
playgrounds and reserves infrastructure. Through assets such as park benches, picnic tables,
this plan, major risks and priorities will be identified bollards, BBQs, playground equipment and
through the improvement of asset management shelters. It is recommended that greater
> consideration be given to these assets and their
practices. In the future, the development of next fae ;
remaining lives when they are re-inspected.
generation asset management plans will provide
far greater detail.
These assets consist of a multitude of assets and ai
include assets such as playground equipment, * Asset Age Profile
sports fields, nature reserves, parks, barbecues, s
10,000
landscaping, shelters, park furniture, shade sails 9 annals
“
ae <<”
and skate facilities. z 6,000
5 4,000
” 2,000 {
0 j B aa i fl ( i i
DM £2 KV ODA AV AD AD
DD O7 ODO PVE
MAD AD AD AD AD AD AD'AD A979 729
eee Ved Required ¥ mee
Document Set+B:-+99618
Version: 5, Version Date: 01/10/2015
Page 16 of 25Section 17
Page 17 of 25
RISKS =
1. Asset deterioration and structural failure Asset condition
(public liability); The overall level of confidence of asset condition for
2. Poor construction techniques and inferior parks, playgrounds and neerree 6 low to moderate
pee based on the compliance risk inspections
maeneHals, undertaken. It is recommended that asset condition is
3. Contributed assets not meeting the based on the below 1 to 5 rating for each of the asset
required levels of service or fit for purpose; classes across the network.
4. Vandalism to playground and park Therefore the current condition profile represented in
ecuiveniict: the graph below is based on an aged base condition
aulP ‘ xe rather than the physical condition. This plan has
5. A lack of condition ‘knowledge Berea the previously identified inaccuracies in acquisition dates
network contributing to _ illinformed that greatly affect our assets remaining life. The first
decisions improvement in condition data is to record the 1 to 5
ratings of all asset classes within the asset system.
ESSE
[SECT (OEEoa ceed
Very Good Condition
Asset renewal LT Cay iinied aslamaxcoaaned
Although the existing renewal activities are a Pr eee
: 4 inor maintenance required (5%)
result of asset failure and defect detection, the Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
development of a long term renewal programme 3 Level of Service ;
through the physical asset condition assessments SARACEN EASE ere 20 7)
pe nae alas Requires Renewal
will improve the capability of predicting suitable 5) Gerckcah sebeiadlupgade tomes a0%)
intervention timeframes. 5 _ Asset Unserviceable
peltemidy Crete: Seiriuirmel es praygrounds on The Physical ca cueeenas aeduae the “core as t
4 ‘ A > ath ed e i ff a g Se}
require renewal and while risk i. minimised management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the IIMM,
through the proactive compliance inspections, International Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being used
there is not a detailed, prioritised or consistent for the majority of Council's infrastructure.
approach in renewal.
Playground assets have shorter life spans than
other assets within parks, and the management
and renewal of these assets is managed in
accordance with Australian Standards. It is
recognised that assets in high profile areas 3 *3
exceed the average use and will reach their end & Age Based Condition
of life earlier than other equipment. iy i
quip g Profile
“Ss
In the current 5 year capital program there are 2
; : 20,000
annual allocations provided for the renewal of e
playground equipment, park shelters and park é
furniture. This the first step in developing more ii if (4 es
robust longer term renewal programmes for these 0
asset classes. 1 2 3 4 5
Condition Rating
Improvement Plan
1. Continue with cyclical maintenance inspections across park and playground infrastructure with results and
overall asset condition (based on the core asset management approach) recorded in asset system;
2. Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and Inspection data to ensure a single point of truth for asset data
within the asset system;
3. Develop a long term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset
deterioration modelling;
a 4. Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
specific to playground equipment, park furniture, shelters, shade sails and natural reserves.
NOOSA COUNCIL PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
t Set ID: 199618: TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 17 of 25Section 18
Page 18 of 25
a eee ee ca Dy
ne acy PSS ee ts > Sn ie A
a . a ' We Mes ny . : wer naan '
m =," 2 | . — see. ’ weve AC
~ ego) NOOSA COUNCIL FK-Ks=" oe
om 55 :
a —
Overview ee } tia 2 Ls ee
Pathway and boardwalk assets have high use 7 ae : 3 W a vs Share
and therefore represent a public liability risk to may tie. ¢ Be) eS - .
Council if there are trip hazards or structural oe ie a Hr " ate. %
failure. A regime of cyclical hazard and u bibs t\ n
structural risk inspections is undertaken however k a Ty
data needs to be captured on the asset system =
to increase confidence in the knowledge of asset as .
condition from the current level. ES
Renewal of these assets is currently reactive and a
based on defects detected during routine / ff
inspections. A prioritised approach to renewals :
is required. if
Total number of Assets = 2,835 ; .
Total length of pathway and boardwalks = 231km . ;
Current replacement cost = $ 44.4m , ,
Current written down value = $ 39.8m ‘ ,
2014/15 depreciation = $711k | Age profile
2014/15 maintenance program = $ 392k . | fy
2015/16 capital renewal program = $ 263k ». In analysing, eu age pantie for parks,
Critical assets — Main Beach and ParkRoad playground and reserve infrastructure the first
boardwalks, Gympie Tce foreshor pathwayystrategic “J sobservation within the profile is the significant
pathway networks and school,Zones” nok, (asset Vall@for 2005.
et y ) ~ In 2005, a proactive asset data collection
programme was undertaken for collecting
Ra \infrastructure data including pathway and
This first generation asset management plan | © Doardwalk assets. The majority of the assets
provides an initial snapshot of Council's | » identified had the acquisition date of the year it
ea and eee oe ee was captured recorded. This approach does not
this plan, major risks and priorities will be reflect the true age of 87% (2,488) of all assets
identified through the improvement of asset in thi ti = ; - ae b
management practices. In the future, the eee a en eee oe :
development of next generation asset assessed to determine the actual construction
management plans will provide far greater detail. year.
These assets include concrete pathways, off road
shared pathways, boardwalks, pathway lighting
and bollards.
9 Asset Age Profile
o
>
% = 30,000
28
< §, 20,000
ij
2 10,000
S 0 _t ts i - 2.
D2 LV o_O WD AY AV AD AO
PPP PoP PnP Parnas
MD? O° OH Se A ey
Year Acquired
Document Set ID: 19961826
Version: 5, Version Date: 01/10/2015
Page 18 of 25Section 19
Page 19 of 25
RISKS
1. Trip hazards (public liability).
2. Structural failure of boardwalks.
3. Non-conforming pathway. Asset condition
4. A lack of condition knowledge across the The overall level of confidence of asset condition for
network contributing to ill-informed pathways and boardwalks is low to moderate, based
decisions on the cyclical trip hazard and boardwalk structures
risk inspections. Currently these inspections are not
consistently recorded as they only address defects
and the overall deterioration issues associated with
these assets.
Asset renewal
Although the existing renewal activities are a Asset condition assessment based on the below 1 to
result of asset failure and defect detection, the 5 rating for each of the asset classes across pathway
development of a long term renewal programme and boardwalk network is required.
through physical asset condition assessments will - .
improve the capability of predicting suitable The current condition profile represented in the graph
intervention timeframes. below is based on an aged base condition rather than
the physical condition. This plan identifies
There are two major (>$500k) renewals proposed inaccuracies in acquisition dates that greatly affect
for pathway and boardwalk assets in the current assets remaining lives.
5 year capital programme, these include: : : 55 .
e Park Road boardwalk, approx. $5m; The first improvement in condition data is to record
* Noosa Main Beach boardwalk, approx. $750k the 1 to 5 ratings of all asset classes within the asset
(surf club to Park Road link). system.
These are significant and high profile assets that
have reached the end of their useful lives. The Sa —-——
development of a cyclical renewal programme Vary Good Condition
that is integrated with financial planning is the 1 Only normal mainetnance required
goal in progressing good asset management 2 _ Minor Defects Only
practices. Minor maintenance required (5%)
Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
3 Level of Service
Significant maintenance required (10-20%)
4 Requires Renewal
Significant renewal/upgrade required (20-40%)
g e,s Asset Unserviceable
3 Age Based Condition 2 Over 50% of Asset requires replacement 5
3 So P rofi le The Physical Asset Condition is measured using the “core asset
2 m management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the IIMM,
YZ International Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being used
3 40,000 for the majority of Council's infrastructure.
S 20,000 5 i
0 oa
ul 2 3 4 5
Condition Rating
Improvement Plan
1. Continue with cyclical maintenance inspections across park and playground infrastructure with results and
overall asset condition (based on the core asset management approach) recorded in the asset system;
2. Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and Inspection data to ensure a single point of truth for asset data
within the asset system;
4 3. Develop a long term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset
y deterioration modelling;
4. Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
specific to pathways and boardwalk assets.
NOOSA COUNCIL PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
r Set ID? 499618: TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 19 of 25Section 20
Page 20 of 25
na
2 RE Og) seat Fo eae & be a : ee
a i i ie - 4 a
=m NOLO N YS OO) O)\ (0) iF ae Fes
., le =
Pe %
i a
Overview ry ,
Roads and carparks are Council's most S
valuable asset representing almost half of total j
asset value. Many significant assets are .
relatively new, and itis not anticipated that they
would require major rehabilitation or renewal for
many decades. Recent road condition surveys
have improved confidence in condition
assessments to ‘moderate’. Road pavements
do perform well and achieved a health check of
8 out of 10. é aac
The Pavement Management System data in the a a
system has lapsed and it is currently being Age profile
updated in order to produce a 3 to 5 year reseal The age profile for roads and carpark assets
programme. Physical condition checks are still ddtes back 7S:\vears. Watbeont times stanificact
required on ancillary infrastructure such as —. y ‘ 9 ia
carparks, road furniture, signage and traffic investment has occurred through the de-maining
calming devices. of David Low Way, Noosa Cooroy Road and the
Total number of assets = 23,173 construction of the arterial road network of
Total length of sealed roads = 550km Eenie Créek Road and Walter Hay Drive.
Total length of gravel roads = 250km
Current replacement cost = $ 427.6m ' et ta :
Current written down value = $ 369%4m These recent acquisitions indicate that high
2014/15 depreciation costs = $6.9m ‘valued assets are fairly new and it is not
2014/15 maintenance costs: e $ 3.2m anticipated that major rehabilitation/renewal
ae agin ayers a Me would be required for decades. The assets that
ritical assets — arterial and sub-arterial ro ‘ 2
network, collector roads and access roads: erate, acquired normals Raids as paler sie
4 de-maining agreement (2000) will need to have
: _ ‘acquisition dates reviewed to ensure that the
remaining useful life of these roads is accurate.
This first generation asset management plan
provides an initial snapshot of Council’s roads and
carpark infrastructure. Through this plan, major
tisks and priorities will be identified through the
improvement of asset management practices. In
the future, the development of second generation
asset management plans will provide far greater
detail. = ‘
2 Asset Age Profile
Next generation plans will address levels of 2
service, financial integration, asset condition > 200,000
knowledge, asset system improvements, planned %
and reactive maintenance activities and provide @ 150,000
case studies on best practice activities. § 100,000
Roads and carparks assets consist not only of 6 50,000 |
sealed and gravel roads and carparks but also the 0 Us coca sessheisaea Ul,
supporting infrastructure such as signs, traffic Onwotanwotanwodr
calming devices, bollards, barriers, pedestrian RAARKHRARAARAAHRSSSS
* . anda ntti nt nt Mt TA ANNAN
crossings and other road furniture.
Year Acquired
Document Set ID: 19961832
Version: 5, Version Date: 01/10/2015
Page 20 of 25Section 21
Page 21 of 25
RISKS dit
1. Asset deterioration and structural failure; Asset condition
2. Poor construction techniques and inferior The overall level of confidence of asset condition for
raatorate: roads and carparks is moderate after the recent road
et ; ; condition survey of the road network. The initial
3. Contributed iegteies not meeting the required results indicate that road pavements are performing
levels of service or fit for purpose; well and have an overall health check of 8 out of 10.
4. Lack of detailed condition knowledge across While this is based on the modelling parameters from
our road network contributing to ill-informed the PMS further analysis and developmentis
daricions required to complement the agreed level of service. It
P should be noted that the condition profile in the below
graph does represent the results similar to the sealed
road pavement condition survey recently conducted.
To further improve the condition data for other asset
classes not held in the PMS, utilising the 1 to 5
Asset renewal ratings will be required. This will result in the ability to
as ps a ag8 develop a | term ren | programme for each
Although the existing renewal activities are a Sia ey ae er
result of asset failure and defect detection, the Sian Octet: atmemetan heakiet ate Ccadien
development of a reseal and rehabilitation
program is critical to ensure there are sustainable Very Good ee
investments in the road and carpark network. 1 Only normal mainetnance required
> Minor Defects Only
Minor maintenance required (5%)
A road pavement management system (PMS) Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
; i ii 3 Level of Service
has been in place since 2002, providing aon aoa requved (16-20%)
information and guidance for road surfacing and 4 Requires Renewal
road pavement improvements. The PMS models pe Fence FARGO 12) 30%)
asset deterioration and determines the optimum 5 Over 60% of Asset requires replacement 5
intervention times for renewing assets. The data The Physical Asset Condition is measured using the “core asset
j ing i management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the IIMM,
has sien ao daha a 7 ene a ee International Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being used
pro: uce an model a ~ to year reseal an for the majority of Council's infrastructure.
rehabilitation program. Council currently allocates
$6.8m towards renewal projects for roads and
carpark assets.
While the PMS caters for our sealed road y
pavement we must still do physical condition 7c +I
assessments on the remainder of infrastructure . Aged Based Condition
such as carparks, road furniture, signage and “9 Pr fil
traffic calming devices. The establishment of = 5. OMe
annual renewal programs for these assets o
classes is essential in the development of 5 500,000
sustainable asset management practices within 2 B os
our organisation. 0 = =
1 2 3 4 5
Condition Rating
Improvement Plan
1. Continue with cyclical maintenance inspections across roads and carpark infrastructure with results and overall
asset condition (based on the core asset management approach) recorded in the asset system;
2. Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and Inspection data to ensure a single point of truth for asset data
within the asset system;
3. Develop a long term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset deterioration
modelling;
4. Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
7 specific to carparks, signs, road furniture and traffic calming devices, in more detail.
- 5. Further develop the Pavement Management System to improve the level of confidence in reseal and
rehabilitation programmes.
NOOSA COUNCIL PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
Set ID: 1996718. TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 21 of 25Section 22
Page 22 of 25
EGY #3 I
- ator tea pigs eet ——
ee SENOS MOCO NCCIEN ee oeean
a x, > v at a = s pi on
a" . —_— - wr
Me s
4 m _ —
Stormwater assets are the second highest SS
value asset owned by Council, however See See
confidence in the knowledge of asset condition Sc
is very low. These assets are predominately
hidden and until there is an issue such as
culvert failure, stormwater pipes flooding a .
property or failure of an asset in a sensitive ae a
environment, little is known of the risk they . <n ee
pose. “eas
Physical condition assessments have
commenced and renewal of these assets » ~ an
requires a prioritised programme. =
Total number of Assets = 22,830 -
Total length of Stormwater drainage = 281km Age profile
Current replacement cost = $ 149.5m The curpéntasset age profile highlighted in the
ht roe oe oe = ; : era ' ‘graph below indicates that the assets lives vary
epreciation costs = $ 2.4m ( :
2014/15 Maintenance costs = $ 644k ' ara Soe ieaitlasheabernh leg
2015/16 capital renewal program $ 550k i identTg when major developments were
| %. undertaken in the 1990's, together with a large
Critical assets — culverts that crosssroad “Spike of assetsjin 2005 when there was a
networks, stormwater pipes and! pits within road , “proactive asset data collection programme
carriageways, gross pollutant traps and bio underway.
Rasliey Peenean eyateine Assets that were added in 2005 have been
= . | \, allocated an acquisition date for that year. This,
. _ however, is not correct and will require further
This first generation asset management plan 1 Bssessment to determine their approximate year
provides an initial snapshot of Council's ’ of construction. Stormwater infrastructure is a
stormwater assets. Through this plan, major risks valuable asset class and will require greater
and priorities will be identified through the investment in the validation and assessment of
improvement of asset management practices. In data and assessment-activities.
the future, the development of next generation les disvahons di ; tk bodies tk
asset management plans will provide far greater Fh SEERA OT NEN Overngy Oremees, ener eran 8
detail. will be important to rectify the known
deficiencies in data in order to have confidence
Stormwater assets consist of pipes and in decision making processes.
structures. Piped assets include culverts which
are structures that are significantly larger in
structure and are designed primarily for road
crossings and structures include pits, manholes,
field inlets / outlets, headwalls, gross pollutant _
traps and water sensitive urban design (WSUD a .
dovinee. oueenee S__ Asset Age Profile
veo
no
Stormwater infrastructure is predominately < 520,000
“hidden” until there is an issue with the =
performance of the asset. These issues can 5 aia tubettll... oc ulin | il
include pipe defects, blockages and lack of o 2 Se
capacity within the local network. It is the flow on Ree eee RaSssa
affects from these issues that cause sink holes in Baa Sa SaaS RRR
roadways, localised flooding or excessive litter in Year Acquired
our waterways.
Document Set ID: 19961828
Version: 5>-Version-Date:-04/4.0/2045
Page 22 of 25Section 23
Page 23 of 25
RISKS or
1. Culvert failures Asset condition
2. Assets within sensitive environments. The level of confidence in stormwater asset
3. Stormwater pipe failures causing flooding condition is deemed to be very low. The current
to property. asset conditions utilised in this plan are determined
4. A lack of condition knowledge across the on an “aged based” calculation and therefore do not
network contributing to _ ill-informed reflect their true physical condition.
decisions. This approach does not take into account assets
5. Stormwater infrastructure in road carriage that are impacted by their environmental conditions
ways. such as active soils, marine locations, or are
structures within road carriage ways or have poor
construction techniques. Therefore a more detailed
physical condition assessment is required before
= renewal investment can be considered.
S s,s
2 Age Based Condition Physical condition assessments have commenced
s P fil through the annual CCTV inspection programme.
$s rome These inspections make the use of advanced
3% technology by utilising a combination of robotic
£100,000 equipment, video imagery and software systems to
¢ provide high level detail on the condition of any
@ 50,000 il given stormwater asset inspected. These
o 0 Gi inspections not only record maintenance defects
but also asset condition supported by photo and
d. 2 3 4 5 video imagery.
Condition Rating
EES
[EEG YER tern eed eer
1 Very Good Condition ;
Asset renewal Only normal mainetnance required
aes Oa 2 Minor Defects Only
Although the existing renewal activities are a Minor maintenance required (5%)
result of asset failure and defect detection, the Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
development of a renewal programme will improve 3 _ Level of Service oa cae
the capability of predicting intervention a aia )
3 4 ‘equires ‘enewal
timeframes. Significant renewal/upgrade required (20-40%)
Stormwater renewals are one of the first asset 5 Asset Unserviceable
classes outside of roads that have a funded Over 50% of Asset requires replacement :
annual renewal program for pipes, pits, kerb and
channels. In addition to these renewals an annual The Physical Asset Condition is measured using the “core asset
ot ee, 5 a management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the IIMM,
proactive CCTV inspection has commenced to Intemational Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being
further develop and prioritise asset renewal. used for the majority of Council's infrastructure until more
advanced asset management practices are considered.
Improvement Plan
1. Continue with cyclical maintenance inspections and CCTV condition assessments across stormwater
infrastructure with results and overall asset condition (based on the core asset management approach)
recorded in the asset system;
2. Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and Inspection data to ensure a single point of truth for asset data
within the asset system;
3. Develop a long term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset
deterioration modelling;
4. Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
specific to pipe network, kerb and channel, bio-basins
NOOSA COUNCIL PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
r Set iD: 199678: TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 23 of 25Section 24
Page 24 of 25
nee ee re '
‘ ey 2 = a ee a “i a, ==! “Perel
a) = V4 = ee ea. » pgs?
75 5
*. an
Overview ial
Environmental compliance is a major risk with ,
waste assets. A lack of knowledge in the “a
condition of an asset, resulting in inadequate
renewal/rehabilitation or poor construction Ps
techniques can contribute to a higher risk = -
outcome.
Current confidence in the knowledge of the o
condition of waste assets is deemed to be low. x
The development of a cyclical condition
inspection program is therefore required.
Total number of waste assets = 23 Age profile
Current replacement cost = $9.6 Waste assets are recent assets in the scale of the
Current written down value = $7.1m Overall asset base. The current age profile has
2014/15 depreciation of $444k identified that the assets are less than 12 years
2014/15 maintenance = $ 50k old. However, waste facility sites are dynamic as
2015/16 capital renewal program $ 200k » they evolve.to complement the landfilling activities
Critical assets — Noosa Eumungie@ead Landfill across the entire site and therefore waste assets
are not constructed to have long lives.
: The current age profile in the graph below
This first generation asset management plan highlights the significant investment in waste
provides an initial snapshot of Council’s waste BsSele a recent yours. This Incides the
assets and infrastructure. Through this plan, major PRPSNSION of the current waste disposal landfill
risks and priorities will be identified through the cell and capital improvements to the leachate
improvement asset management. In the future, the collection system. As these assets are in the early
development of next generation asset stages of their useful lives it is important to
management plans will provide far greater detail continue to monitor and assess their condition and
where required, undertake the recommended
The waste assets consist of assets associated with maintenance activities te ensure these assets
the operation of waste disposal activities including reach their full life potential.
landfill, carparks, buildings, leachate systems and
stormwater management systems.
3 ‘
>. Asset Age Profile
28
ao
2 45,000
a 2,000 i |
= 4,000
=
Oo
0 = = o —_.
2004 2007 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Document SéttD: 19961829
Version: 5, Version Date: 01/10/2015
Page 24 of 25Section 25
Page 25 of 25
RISKS
1. i li 2 “4:
Environmental compliance, es Asset condition
2. Poor construction techniques and _ inferior : 2
wee The level of confidence in asset condition for waste
materials; : ;
: : ; infrastructure is deemed to be low. The current asset
3. Disaster events such as flooding, storm; conditions utilised in this plan are determined on an
4. A lack of condition knowledge across the “aged based” calculation and therefore do not reflect
network contributing to ill-informed decisions. their true physical condition.
The condition profile reflected in the graph below
indicates that generally assets are not old and only a
small number of assets are getting close to the end of
their expected life.
The first improvement in condition data is to record
the 1 to 5 ratings of all waste assets and record
Asset renewal results within the asset system.
Although the majority of current renewal activities
are a result of asset failure and defect detection, Assessment
j [ETT (OTST eLeTeeO
the development ofa renewal programme will an Gee
improve the capability of predicting suitable Es deticromnt nisabbinca reaieed
intervention timeframes before asset failures. 2 Minor Defects Only —
Minor maintenance required (5%)
Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
There is currently a project for the renewal of the 3 Geena ec
weighbridge infrastructure and the entrance to Fs oon = ee or ;
the landfill in the current 5 year capital Significant renewal/upgrade required (20-40%)
Asset Unserviceable
programme. > | Gvar:50% (of Ascot. requitee.roplacemént j
The Physical Asset Condition is measured using the “core asset
In addition to the depreciation of existing assets, management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the IIMM,
a “Waste Provisions Fund’ to meet the costs of International Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being used
‘ ‘ : * é for the majority of Council's infrastructure.
future major work is available. This fund is
intended for items such as final capping and 30
years site maintenance after the landfill is closed.
It also applies to current closed sites that require
ongoing works. This funding is built into current :
charges and set aside in a fund for the future. 8 P= +4
This fund will-be further developed and 2 Age Based Condition
considered with the next generation asset s ‘
management plans and long term financial plans. s Profi le
@
The development of a cyclical condition 210,000
assessment for waste assets will be the first step z
in the development of a long term renewal = 5 000
programme. é .
0 a cae
Céndition Rating” ?
Improvement Plan
1. Formalise and implement cyclical inspections across all waste assets with results recorded in the asset
system;
‘2. Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and inspection data to have a single point of truth for waste
assets within the asset system;
3. Develop along term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset
F deterioration modelling;
. 4, Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
specific to waste buildings, leachate and stormwater systems, landfill cells, weighbridges and roads.
NOOSA COUNCIL PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
r Set iD: 199613; TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 25 of 25