Council archive · source document
RFI - Attachment C - Slope Stability Assessment and Geotechnical report · MCU20/0026
Project No. 1-22543 Page | 6 June, 2020 Ref: 1-22543, 2020-05-20, BR SSA VER 1 Sanya Holdings – Slope Stability Assessment and Geotechnical Report - Proposed Residence, 40 Park Crescent, Sunshine Beach The provided survey (refer Section 1.6) indicates a fall of approximately 11.5m across the site with an RL of approx. 27.5m at the western boundary corner and approx. RL 16.0m at the eastern boundary corner (refer Plate E3, Appendix E). A small concave type feature exists near the centre of the eastern boundary of the site, extending into the site by approx. 15.0m. An approx. 2.0m wide Council easement runs along the north western site boundary from Park Cres to the easement at the rear of the site, understood to be for an underground stormwater service. Outside of the existing structure, the site is generally well landscaped and grassed with several small to medium sized trees and shrubs (refer Plate E4, Appendix E). The site plan (1-22543-01) in Appendix H, shows an overlay of the provided survey (refer Section 1.6), as well as the proposed residence location and test locations. 3.6 Geotechnical Model 3.6.1 Subsurface Profile Given access was only available for one borehole at the front of the lot and hand equipment was used due to the steep slope to the rear of the lot, a combination of drilling and DCP tests were used to provide an assessment of the competency of the subsurface profile. Therefore, the subsurface profile adopted from the testing program is summarized below:- Fill – Encountered in BH1 to 0.3m depth and in HA2 and HA3 to depths of 0.8m and 0.6m respectively, and assume din DCP4 to approx. 0.3m depth. It was described as Silty SAND (SM) and SAND (SP), very loose to loose. In the absence of documentation to confirm that the filling was placed and compacted in accordance with AS 3798-2007, then the filling must be considered as being ‘uncontrolled’. Sand – Encountered in BH1 to total depth of 7.5m, in both hand augers to refusal depths of 1.8m (HA2) and 1.9m (HA3), and assumed beneath the fill in DCP4 to total depth. Described and assumed (where required) as being generally very loose to medium dense, increasing to dense at depths of 7.0m (BH1) and 3.6m (HA2). A summary of the profiles encountered in the test locations is included in Table 1 with borehole and hand auger logs and DCP results in Appendix F and the test locations shown on Drawing No. 1-22543-01 in Appendix H. TABLE 1 SUBSURFACE PROFILE SUMMARY Fill - Very Hand Auger Consistency based on DCP Tests and (3) Loose to assuming Full Sand Profile (m) DCP Total Total Location RL (m) (4) Loose Very Loose to Depth (m) Depth (m) Medium Dense Dense Sand (m) Loose BH01 27.60 0.00-0.30 0.30-2.00 2.00-7.00 7.00-TD 7.50 7.50 5 HA02 18.20 0.00-0.80 0.80-2.20 2.20-3.60 3.60-TD 4.00 1.80 5 HA03 17.20 0.00-0.60 0.60-1.90 1.90-TD NE 4.00 1.90 DCP04 20.00 0.00-0.30 0.30-1.90 1.90-TD NE 4.00 NA Notes:- 1. NE - Not Encountered; NA - Not Applicable; TD - Total Depth. th 2. All depths below existing ground level (20 May, 2020). 3. RL's based on provided survey data. 4. DCP refusal (i.e. blows >20 per 100mm) was not reached. 5. Hand Auger refusal. SOIL SURVEYS
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
RFI - Attachment C - Slope Stability Assessment and Geotechnical report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.