Council archive · source document
RFI - Attachment C - Slope Stability Assessment and Geotechnical report · MCU20/0026
Project No. 1-22543 Page | 13 June, 2020 Ref: 1-22543, 2020-05-20, BR SSA VER 1 Sanya Holdings – Slope Stability Assessment and Geotechnical Report - Proposed Residence, 40 Park Crescent, Sunshine Beach TABLE 5 RISK CRITERIA Situation Suggested Tolerable Loss of Life Suggested Acceptable Loss of Risk limit for the person most at risk Life Risk limit for the person most at risk Existing Slope 10-4 / annum 10-5 / annum Existing Development 10-4 / annum 10-5 / annum New Constructed Slope 10-5 /annum 10-6 /annum New Development 10-5 /annum 10-6 /annum Existing Landslide 10-5 /annum 10-6 /annum Notes: “Existing Slopes” in this context are slopes that are not part of a recognizable landslide and have demonstrated non-failure performance over at least several seasons or events of extended adverse weather, usually being a period of at least 10 to 20 years. “Existing Development” includes existing structures, and slopes that have been modified by cut and fill, that are not located on or part of a recognizable landslide and have demonstrated non-failure performance over at least several seasons or events of extended adverse weather, usually being a period of at least 10 to 20 years. “New Constructed Slope” includes any change to existing slopes by cut or fill or changes to existing slopes by new stabilisation works (including replacement of existing retaining walls or replacement of existing stabilisation measures, such as rock bolts or catch fences). “New Development” includes any new structure or change to an existing slope or structure. Where changes to an existing structure or slope result in any cut or fill of less than 1.0m vertical height from the toe to the crest and this change does not increase the risk, then the Existing Slope / Existing Structure criterion may be adopted. Where changes to an existing structure do not increase the building footprint or do not result in an overall change in footing loads, then the Existing Development criterion may be adopted. “Existing Landslides” have been considered likely to require remedial works and hence would become a New Constructed Slope and require the lower risk. Even where remedial works are not required per se, it would be reasonable expectation of the public for a known landslide to be assessed to the lower risk category as a matter of “public safety” Acceptable risks are usually considered to be one order of magnitude lower than the Tolerable Risks. It is important to distinguish between “acceptable risks” and “tolerable risks”. Tolerable Risks are risks within a range that society can live with so as to secure certain benefits. It is a range of risk regarded as non-negligible and needing to be kept under review and reduced further if practicable. Acceptable Risks are risks which everyone affected is prepared to accept. Action to further reduce such risk is usually not required unless reasonably practicable measures are available at low cost in terms of money, time and effort. SOIL SURVEYS
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
RFI - Attachment C - Slope Stability Assessment and Geotechnical report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.