Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 4 - Response to Further Advice Rob Friend and Associates
[25]
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO7 AO7 R7.1
Lot design and building siting minimises Each residential lot: 1. Uses and works including building works
bushfire hazard risk to people and property. are sited on lots greater than 2500m2:
1. includes a building envelope, identified on 2. The boutique hotel construction is occurring
a plan of subdivision; in the western portion of the site and is
2. is of sufficient size and shape to allow for therefore furthest away from the hazardous
efficient emergency access to buildings for vegetation to the east and north.
fire fighting appliances (e.g. by avoiding Additionally, a pool will separate the hotel
battle-axe/hatchet lots and long narrow lots from the vegetation to east and in the east
with long access driveways to buildings); of the subject site. The tennis court
3. where more than 2500m², achieves construction will require the removal of
setbacks from hazardous vegetation in line vegetation.
with Bushfire Attack Level 29 requirements 3. A 10m setback from hazardous vegetation
as per AS3959; and for the hotel is achieved in the proposed
4. is designed so that buildings and layout plan. The tennis courts will require
structures are sited in locations of lowest clearing of and management of hazardous
hazard within the lot and elements of the vegetation on the northern end of the
development least susceptible to fire are subject site.
closest to the fire hazard. 4. The tennis courts and pool are the least
susceptible structures to fire and are sited
closest to the bushfire hazard.
RFA17-040Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Mitigation Plan | 61 Noosa Springs Dr. Noosa Heads 30 April 2022
Rob Friend & Associates Pty Ltd
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.