Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Council archive · source document

Planning Statement - Minor change · MCU18/0013.03

of 5

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                  The proposed changes do not trigger referral to an extra referral agency.

                  (D) a referral agency to assess the application against, or have regard to,
                  matters prescribed by regulation under section 55(2), other than matters the
                  referral agency must have assessed the application against, or have had
                  regard to, when the application was made;

                  The proposed changes do not trigger referral to a referral agency.

                  (E) public notification if public notification was not required for the
                  development application.

                  The proposed changes do not trigger public notification of the proposal.

The Planning Act 2016 states that when assessing a change application the responsible entity:

        81 (3) (a) must assess against, or have regard to, the matters that applied when the
                   development application was made; and
              (b) may assess against, or have regard to, the matters that applied when the change
                   application was made.

The 2016 Noosa Plan is relevant for the site which maps the site in the Coastal Protection Area. The
Natural Hazards and Natural Resources Overlay has specific requirements for Coastal protection
areas including Outcome 20 which states:

        O20 Buildings and other structures including swimming pools and retaining walls do not extend
        seaward of the coastal building line except—
           a) uncovered and unenclosed cantilevered balconies that do not extend greater than 3m
                seaward of the coastal building line; and
           b) are setback a minimum of 6m from the seaward boundary (See Figure 13.7).

The beam fully complies with the above Outcome as the beam is not located over a balcony below
as detailed in the figure below. The beam presents an architectural feature around a void area and
therefore complies with scheme requirements.




Figure 2 – Void



                                                   Page 4

Used in these records

About this file

File size
602 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Planning Statement - Minor change.pdf · 602 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.