Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Council archive · source document

PM Submission - Thomas Kearney - MCU18/0015

of 45

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

I enclose two assessments of the Core Geotechnical reports available on the Noosa Council
website.The reports are written by a senior geotechnical engineer and by a senior structural
engineer. Both express grave reservations about the geotechnical foundations of this development.
In particular note Item 14 in both reports. Please take this submission also as a Notice of Concern.

In regard to the Core Consultants Limitations declaration

Paragraph 3: "Core did not perform a complete assessment of all possible circumstances that may
exist at the site referenced in the document."
In view that this development may destabilise the entire ridge and buildings on the western side of
the development this alone should be grounds for refusal of this application.

Paragraph 4: "Given the LIMITED nature of the enquiry additional studies may be required.
THE COUNCIL SHOULD NOT GIVE APPROVAL.
LIMITED enquiry risks serious damage to Mallawa and neighbouring buildings.



The Core Geotechnical report is incomplete and as such this application should be rejected.




The Golder geotechnical report 2003 description of the site is enclosed.

"The majority of the site is a moderately to steeply sloping sand dune slope. Etc.". "possible slip
with in the dune". "a number of mature trees were observed to have bent trunks indicative of
previous ground movement."




Approval of this application will endanger properties adjacent to the western border of this
development to severe dangers of land slip.



Approval of this application will endanger from land slip the significant stand of hoop pines
adjacent to the development.

This development of the 12 units is for a few millionaires and will expose owners nearby properties
To Structural and financial risks.

I enclose the Australian article on the recent financial history of project development in Noosa.
This will be a very very expensive project if approved. I don't wish as a ratepayer to be left holding
their baby.



Submitted by Dr Thomas Kearney

on behalf of Narelle and Thomas Kearney
Unit 3 I. 34 Edgar Bennett Ave
Noosa Heads Old 4567

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.0 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

PM Submission - Thomas Kearney - MCU18_0015.pdf · 2.0 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.