Council archive · source document
05/0901 - Change to a Development Approval [As Published] · 132005.901.02
@ Page3 Overlay Maps, do not cause any significant adverse impacts on the coastal resources of the location nor interrupt the natural cycles of erosion and accretion of foreshore areas and beaches. AND O7 Buildings, structures and works within the Coastal Protection Precinct that are visible from the beach— a) are designed to protect the character of the beachfront when viewed from the water and integrate with the surrounding natural landscape and skyline vegetation (see Error! Reference source not found.); and b) are finished predominately in colours and hues of the surrounding natural landscape; AND O08 Rear fences adjacent to the beachfront within the Coastal Protection Precinct are designed and sited to be sympathetic with the visual amenity of the beachfront and do not degrade the natural beachfront character. building line; or b) where a coastal building line does not exist on properties fronting the beachfront or a reserve adjoining the beachfront— are setback a minimum of 6m from the seaward boundary of the site; AND $17.2 Cantilevered decks that are uncovered and unenclosed located seaward of the coastal building line— a) do not extend seaward of the average of the outermost seaward projection of buildings on directly adjoining properties; and b) are a maximum depth of 3m; c) are setback a minimum of 6m from the seaward boundary of the site; AND $17.3 Where a coastal building line does not exist on properties fronting the beachfront or a reserve adjoining the beachfront— cantilevered decks are setback a minimum of 6m from the seaward boundary of the site; AND $17.4 Dense landscaping, comprising a mix of native coastal species of ground cover, scrubs and trees, is provided for a width of 5m from the seaward or rear boundary of the site to provide adequate landscape buffering to protect the coastal dune system. $18.1 No solution provided 1 $19.1 Rear fences adjacent to the beachfront within the Coastal Protection Precinct (as shown on Overlay Map OM4.5) incorporate the following— a) no more than 1.2m in height; and b) open construction (ie at least 50% transparent); c) lightweight materials (ie timber); and d) dark colours to blend with the natural landscape. AND $19.2 Gates are not installed in fences to gain direct access to the beachfront. metres to the cantilevered deck. The proposed modifications seek to increase this setback to 7 metres. As previously detailed, the proposal seeks to retain the existing structure and undertake minor upgrades to intemal functionality and extemal! visual appearance of the dwelling. The eastern facade of the existing structure is located forward of the 15 metre coastal building line as detailed on the proposal plans included as Attachment 3. It is considered that discretion is warranted in this case as the following is noted: . the proposal does not seek to extend further into the coastal buikding line; . the existing dwelling is setback further than that of the adjoining southern dwelling; . the existing dwelling does not. adversely impact the coastal resource or natural cycles of erosion; . the proposed renovations will improve the visual appearance of the dwelling when viewed from the beach frontage. As the proposal does not seek to undertake any works forward of the existing dwelling, all existing vegetation within this area is able to be retained. 6. CONCLUSION This application can be supported on a number of grounds. These grounds include: * The proposed changes significantly reduce the scale and bulk of the approved dwelling; * The proposed changes increase both the street front and beach front setbacks of the approved dwelling; * The proposed changes utilise the existing dwelling, thereby significantly reducing the amount of earthworks required within the sensitive easter portions of the site; * The proposed changes improve the dwelling's visual contribution to the surrounding area; as it teduce the box-like profile of the approved structure, and incorporates overhangs, pitching and extemal cladding;
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
05/0901 - Change to a Development Approval [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.5 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.