Original source · versioned page text
2021-03-15 General Committee Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 15 MARCH 2021
7. The proposed development fails to meet Overall Outcomes 13.7.2 a), b),
c), d) (i), (ii), (iii) and (v), e) and g) and Specific Outcomes O1, O3, O4, O5,
O6, O8, O9, O10, O14, O15, O18 and O19 of the Biodiversity Overlay Code
as the proposal will result in the removal of significant vegetation and
intrude into the site’s riparian buffer.
8. The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcomes 14.157.2 a) an b) of
the Water Sensitive Design Code as the development:
i. is not designed and could not be constructed in a manner that does
not impede, long term attainment of relevant Environmental Values
and Water Quality Objectives as specified in the Environmental
Protection Policy 2009;
ii. proposes infrastructure within the riparian zone and an extent of cut
and fill that is likely to create adverse impacts on downstream
ecosystems, properties and infrastructure due to changes to
stormwater flow, water quality or ecosystem health.
9. The application proposes development within the Water Supply Catchment
which may result in adverse effects on the quality of water entering Lake
Macdonald contrary to Specific Outcome O11 of the Natural Hazards and
Natural Resources Overlay Code.
10. The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcome 14.111.2 (c) and
Specific Outcome O7 of the Driveways and Car Parking Code as:
i. Sufficient visitor parking is not provided and appropriately located for
visitors of the Retirement and Special Needs use; and
ii. Sufficient parking is not provided for the golf club house.
11. The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcome 14.111.2 (c) and
Specific Outcome O8 of the Driveways and Car Parking Code and Specific
Outcome O7 and O36 of the Residential Uses Code as internal driveways
are too narrow to satisfactorily accommodate internal traffic movements.
12. The proposed built form and landscaping is not consistent with the
preferred character within Cooroy and will result in an appearance of
excessive bulk, limited landscaping and continual roof form.
13. Noosa Plan 2020 has identified that it can meet the requirements for
residential accommodation until 2041 within the current Urban Growth
Boundary. The application has failed to demonstrate a significant planning
need to develop outside of these boundaries, nor any overriding community
benefit which would justify approving the development despite its conflict
with the Planning Scheme and relevant State Planning Policies.
14. In preparing the Noosa Plan 2020 and in reviewing submissions pertaining
to this property Council considered the development potential and
suitability of this site and it was considered that despite its inclusion within
the Urban Footprint of the SEQ Regional Plan, commitment of the land for
urban purposes was neither necessary nor appropriate.
15. The proposal is not consistent with the provisions of the Noosa Plan 2020
which seek that the land is developed for rural residential purposes.
16. The proposal does not comply with the overall outcomes sought by the
Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands overlay code in Noosa Plan 2020
as the development:
i. is not designed, sited, nor could it be constructed in a way that avoids
adverse impacts on ecologically important areas, ecological systems
Page 19 of 24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.