Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Darren Tindale - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
budget accommodation. While this is the developer’s risk, it has a bearing on
the completion of the proposed Stage 2 with the visitor accommodation.
Therefore, the completion of Stage 2, which contains the developer’s limited
commitment to visitor accommodation must be seriously doubted.
I ask that Council consider the sincerity of the developer in providing visitor
accommodation when it is left to Stage 2 and the developer’s record to date of
having built no visitor accommodation since 2009.
5. Disruption to Peregian Village and surrounding areas during
construction if this DA is approved
5.1 Engineering Services Report – Page 5 in Response 2B states:-
“There will be earthworks required to facilitate construction of stormwater
treatment facilities, sanitary drainage and allow for an aesthetically pleasing
and functional built form. There is little opportunity for fill material to be won
on site therefore most of the fill material will need to be imported”.
While the total amount of fill required does not seem to have been identified
Figure 6 “illustrates the ‘swampy’ nature of the lower area of the site in the
vicinity of the proposed gabion wall” and states that “a fill wall of
approximately 2.0m will be required”.
I agree with the comment at page 10 of 13 in the Information Request “that the
extent of filling of the site may need to be reduced.”
COMMENT: The imported fill will all have to come in via Sandpiper Lane and
on the access road to the IGA and the other shops. It will therefore, directly and
significantly affect them and the Hardware store. This will involve considerable
noise and disruption from the source of the fill to the development and return.
It will also cause considerable disruption to the roundabout at the village and
to the Peregian Beach Hotel and other premises in that area.
COMMENT: The importation of fill will result in the creek, which seems to have
been ignored in the DA, being diverted to run through the Council Reserve.
5.2 Engineering Services Report – Page 7 in Response 2B
I querys why water reticulation is proposed down the pedestrian access lane to
the Peregian Beach Sports Ground (Lot 75 on MCH839108) and a
Unity Water meter is proposed at the Peregian Beach Sports Ground boundary
rather than on the developers property
I also querywhy Electricity supply will be provided by “installing underground
infrastructure down the Peregian Sports Reserve access strip” rather than
through the developers property.
Document Set ID: 20308173
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission Object - Darren Tindale - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
PM Submission Object - Darren Tindale - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 126 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.