L03 Submission

premises are inconsistent and not suitable within Precinct E1 in the SBC. Only six (6) of the sixteen
(16) uses proposed in the QIC application are consistent with The Noosa Plan 2006. Table 1
below lists consistent and inconsistent proposed uses incorporated in the QIC application under
The Noosa Plan 2006.

Table 1 – Consistent & Inconsistent Uses
 Consistent                                          Inconsistent
  Commercial business (Type 1 Office)                Entertainment and dining business (Type 1
                                                         Food and beverages)
         Commercial business (Type 2 Medical)
                                                        Entertainment and dining business (Type 2
         Commercial     business        (Type   3       Recreation, amusement and fitness)
          Veterinary)
                                                        Entertainment and dining business (Type 3
         Education (Type 1 Childcare)                   Bar)

         Education (Type 3 Adult)                      Education (Type 4 Information)

         Wellbeing (Type 2 Social)                     Open space (Type 1 Sport & recreation)

                                                        Retail Business (Type 2 Shop & Salon)

                                                        Retail Business (Type 4 Showroom)

                                                        Retail Business (Type 7 Garden and
                                                         Lifestyle Centre)

                                                        Service and utility (Type 2 Installation)

                                                        Undefined Use (Temporary Markets)


The NHC cannot support a development proposal whereby there are so many proposed uses
inconsistent with The Noosa Plan 2006 and also drastically inconsistent with the strategic
planning initiatives for that site and provides no real solution on how the strategic planning
initiatives will be appropriately accommodated on alternative site/s.


     3.     The QIC application does not meet the overall outcomes for the Noosaville
            Locality as identified in The Noosa Plan 2006.

The Noosaville Locality Code in The Noosa Plan 2006 is one of the important applicable
development codes against which the QIC application is to be assessed. The Overall Outcomes
for the Noosaville Locality Code are intended to strategically guide development within Noosaville
locality and the expansion of the SBC.

The NHC considers that the QIC application is inconsistent with the Overall Outcomes for the SBC
as identified in section 11.8.2 (w) of The Noosa Plan 2006 as summarised below:

Non-Retailing Development

Section (w) iii of the Overall Outcomes of the SBC requires the need for “…the development of a
substantial amount of non-retailing development for employment opportunities beyond retail
business”. Section E1 of the SBC has been specifically designated to include primarily
employment, technology and research and development uses. The QIC application over Precinct
E1 does not include non-retailing development for employment industries and as a result fails to
comply with Section (w) iii of the Overall Outcomes of the Noosaville Locality.