2014-01-20 Ordinary Meeting Agenda

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA   20 JANUARY 2014




                             Page 21 of 86

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                       20 JANUARY 2014

   ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                        14 NOVEMBER 2013

   with the surrounding residential streetscape, given its scale and form including the use of
   40m long x 3.5m high acoustic walls to Rufous Street, with no on site landscaping provision
   for screening. While potential amenity impacts from on-site activities have been addressed,
   the development will have significant adverse impacts on nearby residents due to the
   increased traffic movement on Woodland Drive and the applicant has failed to satisfactorily
   address this issue.

   The proposal significantly conflicts with The Noosa Plan and there are insufficient grounds to
   justify the conflict. The proposal is, therefore, recommended for refusal.

   OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
   That Council REFUSE Application No. MCU13/0092 for a Development Permit for
   Material Change of Use (Entertainment & dining Type 1 - Food & beverages,
   Commercial Type 1 — Office, and Retail business Type 2 - Shop & Salon) situated at 5-
   7 Rufous St PEREGIAN BEACH for the following reasons:
      1. the proposed development does not comply with the Overall Outcomes of The
          Noosa Plan’s Eastern Beaches Locality, Business Uses, Community Uses,
          Driveways and Carparking, and Transport, Roads & Drainage Codes
      2. the proposed development would effectively form a second shopping centre at
          Peregian Beach, is likely to adversely impact on the role and function of the
          Peregian Beach village and presents a poor unappealing urban design outcome
      3. the proposal will alienate land intended for open space recreation purposes
          and the applicant has not demonstrated that the community would not be
          disadvantaged by the loss of open space recreation land
      4. the development would have unacceptable impacts on traffic operations and
          traffic safety at the intersection of Woodland Drive and David Low Way, and in
          Rufous Street
      5. traffic generated by the development proposed would have significant adverse
          impacts on the amenity of existing residences nearby and
      6. the proposed development raises significant conflicts with The Noosa Plan and
          there are insufficient grounds to justify the conflict with planning scheme.
   FINANCE AND RESOURCING
   If council were to approve this development, the applicant would be required to pay
   infrastructure charges for trunk infrastructure.
   Council's Infrastructure Policy Branch has provided the following estimate of the
   infrastructure charges required by this development.

   Sunshine Coast Regional Council                          OM Agenda Page 61 of 360

                                                                                   Page 21 of 86