Original source · versioned page text
2018-04-26 Special Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
AGENDA
Special Meeting
Thursday, 26 April 2018
commencing at 11.30am
Council Chambers, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin
Committee: Crs Tony Wellington (Chair), Jess Glasgow, Ingrid Jackson,
Joe Jurisevic, Frank Pardon, Brian Stockwell, Frank Wilkie
“Noosa Shire – different by nature”
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 41 sections
Section 2
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGE
ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES -
REPORTS
1 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN (REVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS) 3
MEETING CLOSURE -
Page 2 of 42
Section 3
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
1 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN (REVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS)
DOCUMENT INFORM AT ION
Author Infrastructure Assessment Coordinator, Oddbjorn Ludvigsen
Environment and Sustainable Development Department
Index ECM/ Subject/ LGIP Reviews (Independent / State / Community)
Attachments 1. Minister's Approval (02-03-2018) LGIP Public Consultation
2. Staff Review of LGIP Submissions (6 March to 18 April 2018)
3. Submissions Received (6 March to 18 April 2018)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report presents the staff review and recommendations on submissions received during
public consultation of the proposed Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) under the
current Noosa Plan 2006. The report recommends Council:
a) endorse the proposed LGIP as amended to comply with the Minister’s conditions and
proceed with no significant change to the version (v2) released for public consultation other
than for one minor typographical correction;
b) proceed to the Appointed Independent Reviewer’s second review; and
c) submit the proposed LGIP (v2) to the Minister for a second review and request approval for
Council to adopt the proposed LGIP amendment to The Noosa Plan 2006.
Council is required to amend its current Priority Infrastructure Plan (PIP) to an adopted Local
Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) by 30 June 2018 to continue issuing infrastructure
charges and impose conditions about trunk infrastructure on development.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Infrastructure Assessment Coordinator to the Special Meeting
dated 26 April 2018 regarding the Local Government Infrastructure Plan (Review of Submissions)
and:
A. Adopt the staff review and recommendations contained in Attachment 2 to the report as
Council’s consideration of submissions on the proposed Local Government Infrastructure
Plan (LGIP) received during the public consultation period from 6 March to 18 April 2018;
B. Proceed with the LGIP amendment version (v2) that was released for public consultation
with no significant change other that one minor typographical correction to “Table 15.5 List
of extrinsic material” to reflect the correct version “Ext.11-1_Network Demand Calcs_v2.zip”
as provided during public consultation;
C. Advise submitters of Council’s decision to proceed with the proposed LGIP in accordance
with items A and B above;
D. Engage the Appointed Independent Reviewer to conduct a second compliance check of the
proposed LGIP (v2) in accordance with the statutory guideline for LGIP’s; and
E. On receiving the Appointed Independent Reviewer’s completed checklist and written
statement, request the Chief Executive Officer to write to the Minister for State
Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning requesting approval for Council
to adopt the proposed LGIP (v2) amendment to the Noosa Plan 2006.
Page 3 of 42
Section 4
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
REPORT
At the Ordinary Meeting of 16 November 2017, Council resolved to amend the current planning
scheme (The Noosa Plan 2006) to replace the current Priority Infrastructure Plan (PIP) with a
Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP amendment) and authorised the CEO to:
submit the draft LGIP to the Minister requesting approval to proceed to public consultation;
make amendments to the draft LGIP if required by the Minister; and
on receiving the Ministers’ approval, proceed to public consultation of the draft LGIP.
1. Minister’s approval for LGIP to proceed to public consultation
The Draft LGIP was submitted to the Minister on 20 November 2017 requesting approval to
proceed to public consultation. The Minister’s approval was received with conditions on 2 March
2018 and is provided as Attachment 1.
The Minister’s conditions (Enclosure 1 of the approval) required amendments to be made to the
Draft LGIP before proceeding to public consultation as follows:
1. “Amend the relevant components of the proposed LGIP, the schedule of works and maps
to identify and apportion transport works by catchments by including the nine locality sub-
catchments as the service catchments.”
2. “Amend DTMR-1 to R17 and its establishment cost to $0 (Demaining Agreement April
2000) and delete DTMR-2 to DTMR-8 from the proposed LGIP.”
3. “Remove reference to Translink from future works items 319775 and 319776 from the
proposed LGIP.
4. “Remove the future park item 8/14 (Noosaville Foreshore Land Use Master Plan) from the
parks and land for community facilities network from the proposed LGIP.
Enclosure 2 of the Minister’s approval includes two items of “Further Advice” in relation to cash
flow projections and alignment between LGIP, Asset Management Plans (AMP) and Long-Term
Financial Forecasts (LTFF). It is understood that this ‘Further Advice’ is being included as
standard advice in all LGIP approvals, however these two items have already been considered
and addressed by Council’s Director Corporate Services and Asset Planning Manager as
provided in the extrinsic material document “Ext.14_Financial Sustainability Statement _LGIP
Alignment with AMP & LTFF”.
2. Ministerial changes made to Draft LGIP
Discussions were held from 5 to 9 February 2018 with the Department of State Development,
Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning (Maroochydore office) in order to resolve any issues.
The Department’s Brisbane office raised what officers consider to be an arbitrary issue with
Councils Transport network which is made up two service catchments (i.e. Coastal and
Hinterland areas) with the Department considering this number of catchments to be inadequate.
This was disputed by Council officers as the Department had not properly considered or
understood how the actual transport network operates in Noosa. Similarly, the network review
“Noosa Traffic Study to 2036” by Holland Traffic Consulting Pty Ltd which supports Council’s
transport catchments and is provided in the extrinsic material, also appears to have been
overlooked by the Department in raising this issue.
Page 4 of 42
Section 5
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
It is also considered the Department’s view also falls outside any statutory guideline requirement
regarding a minimum quantity of catchments i.e. page 15 of Statutory Guideline 03/14 only
states:
“service catchments. These are the areas for which the network demand projections are
stated in the planning assumptions. The service catchments reflect the unique servicing
patterns for the network.”
Furthermore, the Draft LGIP had already been checked and confirmed to be compliant with the
Act and statutory guidelines by the earlier Independent Review process.
Notwithstanding this in order to quickly progress the LGIP, Council officers agreed to respond to
the Departments comments on the number of catchments by using the 9 locality sub-catchments
as the service catchments and then for the SOW model and distribute the infrastructure items
across these new localities based service catchments in a similar fashion as originally done for
the previous Coastal & Hinterland areas.
Consequently, the Draft LGIP previously endorsed by Council at the Ordinary Meeting of 16
November 2017 was amended to comply with the Minister’s conditions as follows:
i. Part 15 Local government infrastructure plan:
Section 15.1 (3) (b) - Inserted the year 2031 that was accidentally omitted as advised
by the Department.
ii. Schedule 9.1 Planning assumption tables:
Table 15.13 - Existing and projected demand for the transport network – Replaced with
a new table containing 9 x Service (Locality) catchments in lieu of the previous 2 x
Service catchments of Coastal and Hinterland areas.
iii. Schedule 9.2 Schedules of works:
Table 15.16 - Transport network schedule of works
- 1. Road Projects:
o Amended DTMR-1 project to Council project R17 with cost reference to $0
(Demaining Agreement April 2000)
o Deleted DTMR-2 to DTMR-8 projects.
- 3. Bus Stop Projects
o Removed Translink reference to project costs: 319775 & 319776.
Table 15.17 - Parks and land for community facilities schedule of works:
- Deleted future park project item 8/14 “Noosaville Foreshore Land Use Master Plan”
with its cost $91,375 and reduced the future Total Establishment cost of the
network.
iv. Schedule 9.3 Local government infrastructure plan maps:
Introductory page Item 3 – Amended the Note to state: “For the LGIP, the Transport
Service Catchments comprise of the Planning Scheme Localities”. This replaces the
previously stated catchments for The Noosa Coastal Area and The Noosa Hinterland
Area (comprising Locality sub-catchments).
SC9.3-3 LGIP – PFTI Transport maps:
- Amended all map legends to detail the 9 x Service (Locality) catchments in lieu of
the previous 2 x Service Catchments of Coastal and Hinterland areas with sub-
catchments.
- Amended DTMR-1 project to Council project R17
- Deleted DTMR-2 to DTMR-8 projects
Page 5 of 42
Section 6
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
v. Extrinsic Material:
Amended the excel spreadsheet calculation of Transport catchment demands to
“Transport Demand Calc_v2” as supporting material showing how the revised transport
demands were determined to comply with the Minister’s condition of approval.
vi. LGIP SOW model:
Demand Forecast – Transportation:
- Amended to the 9 x Service (Locality) catchments in lieu of the previous 2 Service
Catchments of Coastal and Hinterland areas.
Asset Inputs:
- Current Infrastructure (& Catchments Served) - Transportation
o Amended to the 9 x Service (Locality) catchments with allocation of
infrastructure item costs as negotiated with the Department in lieu of the
previous 2 x Service Catchments of Coastal and Hinterland areas.
- Proposed Infrastructure (& Catchments Served) - Transportation
o Amended to the 9 x Service (Locality) catchments with allocation of
infrastructure item costs as negotiated with the Department in lieu of the
previous 2 x Service Catchments of Coastal and Hinterland areas.
- Proposed Infrastructure (& Catchments Served) - Parks & Community Facilities
o Deleted future park project item 8/14 “Noosaville Foreshore Land Use Master
Plan” with its cost $91,375
All the above LGIP documents that were amended are highlighted as version 2 (v2) with original
documents remaining unchanged and also provided for public consultation. It should be noted
that these amendments result in insignificant differences to the SOW model’s outputs for the
“Summary Cost Schedule” and “Summary Cash flow Projections”.
3. Public Consultation of LGIP
In accordance with the statutory guideline, public consultation of the proposed LGIP amendment
commenced with a Notice in the Noosa News on 6 March 2018 advising a consultation period
from Tuesday 6 March 2018 until Wednesday 18 April 2018 (30 business days). The proposed
LGIP amendment and supporting material was available on Council’s website including “Your
Say Noosa” and at Level 2 of Council Chambers in Tewantin.
Council also issued an additional media release on Friday 9 March 2018 requesting community
feedback on the proposed LGIP.
4. Review of Submissions Received
Following the close of business Wednesday 18 April 2018, five (5) submissions had been
received.
The staff review and recommendations on the submissions received is provided as Attachment
2 for Council’s review and endorsement. Full copies of the submissions are also provided as
Attachment 3 noting the submitter personal details have been removed for privacy.
The submissions primarily related to the following:
i. One submission was received by direct email requesting a change to the land use zoning
of a particular area on Eumundi Noosa Rd between Headland Drive and the Good
Shepherd Lutheran College in Noosaville. This is a submission in relation to potential future
land use zoning for the new planning scheme and is not applicable to this proposed LGIP
under the current Noosa Plan 2006. However, it has been forwarded to the Strategic
Planning Team for further consideration in development of the New Planning Scheme.
Page 6 of 42
Section 7
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
ii. Two submissions from the one submitter were received by mail requesting:
o a bring forward in the estimated timing of a future sports park project proposed for
Pomona,
o additional embellishment of a “non-trunk” park in Pomona; and
o to change a trunk pathway missing link project to the Pomona school for an
alternative and/or additional pathway to the Pomona showgrounds already serviced
by a trunk pathway link.
iii. A submission from the same submitter in ii above was received by mail, however it relates
only to “commercial building design guidelines for Pomona” and has no relevance at all to
the proposed LGIP. However it has been forwarded to the Strategic Planning Team for
further consideration in development of the New Planning Scheme.
iv. One submission was received through the “Your Say Noosa” portal via Council’s website
and suggests "The amendment should include the allowance of synthetic turf to Nature
strips" and does not relate directly to a specific LGIP issue. However, it has been forwarded
to the Infrastructure Planning, Design & Delivery and Strategic Planning Teams for
consideration if suitable for citing in a future planning scheme policy on engineering
standards.
Following the close of public consultation, staff have reviewed the submissions received and
consider that no change is necessary to be made to the proposed LGIP version (v2) that was
released for public consultation with its base date mid-2014 under The Noosa Plan 2006 as
detailed in Attachment 2.
However, staff have noticed one minor typographical discrepancy in “Table 15.5 List of extrinsic
material” that did not reflect the amended version “Ext.11-1_Network Demand Calcs_v2.zip” that
included the amended excel spreadsheet “Transport Demand Calc_v2” that was on display
during the public consultation period to fulfil the Minister’s approval condition relating to the
transport network service catchments.
Staff recommend Council proceed with the LGIP amendment version (v2) that was released for
public consultation with no significant change other than one minor typographical correction to
“Table 15.5 List of extrinsic material” to reflect the correct version “Ext.11-1_Network Demand
Calcs_v2.zip” as provided during public consultation.
5. Remaining Legislative Process Requirements and Timeframe
Council is required to amend its current Priority Infrastructure Plan (PIP) with an adopted Local
Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) by 30 June 2018 to continue issuing infrastructure
charges and impose conditions about trunk infrastructure on development.
Following Council’s review of submissions and consideration to proceed with the proposed LGIP
amendment, the proposed LGIP undergoes the following remaining statutory requirements:
a second Appointed Reviewer’s review (estimate 5-10 days following Council’s decision);
a second Minister’s review and approval (statutory guideline performance indicator timeframe
= 20 business days); and
final adoption and gazettal by Council (statutory guideline performance indicator timeframe =
30 business days).
Page 7 of 42
Section 8
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
This is also summarised by the following diagram and estimated timeline:
Previous Council Consideration
Ordinary Meeting, 28 August 2014, Item 5, Page 9
That Council note the report by the Infrastructure Assessment Officer to the Planning &
Organisation Committee Meeting dated 19 August 2014 and:
A. Resolve to undertake an amendment to the Priority Infrastructure Plan in accordance with
the recent amendments to the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and corresponding new
Statutory Guideline 03/14;
Ordinary Meeting, 21 July 2016, Item 9, Page 8
That Council note the report by the Infrastructure Assessment Coordinator to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 12 July 2016 and approve the Priority Infrastructure Area
(PIA) Maps provided at Attachment 1 for the proposed Local Government Infrastructure Plan
(LGIP) to replace the current Priority Infrastructure Plan (PIP) of the current Noosa Plan planning
scheme.
Ordinary Meeting, 15 December 2016, Item 5, Page 4
That Council note the report by the Infrastructure Assessment Coordinator to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 6 December 2016 and;
A. Approve the Planning Assumptions contained in the report and provided in Attachments 1,
2 and 3 for proceeding with the new Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) of the
current Noosa Plan planning scheme;
B. Note a future report to Council may be presented to adjust population and development
projections in Attachment 3 if any major discrepancies are discovered following completion
of the staff final review of the supporting DMaTT GIS output data; and
C. Request the CEO to write to Unitywater thanking their staff in providing the DMaTT
population and development data for use in Council’s LGIP and to commit Council’s
ongoing support and assistance in future DMaTT updates.
LGIP Workshop held on 19 January 2017
Page 8 of 42
Section 9
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Ordinary Meeting, 16 February 2017, Item 5, Page 4
That Council note the report by the Infrastructure Assessment Coordinator to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 February 2017 and approve the Desired Standards of
Service (DSS) for the Public Parks and Land for Community Facilities network provided in
Attachment 2 for proceeding with the new Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) under
The Noosa Plan 2006.
Ordinary Meeting, 16 February 2017, Item 6, Page 4
That Council note the report by the Infrastructure Assessment Coordinator to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 February 2017 and approve the Desired Standards of
Service (DSS) for the Transport network provided in Attachment 1 for proceeding with the new
Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) under The Noosa Plan 2006.
Ordinary Meeting, 20 April 2017, Item 3, Page 3
That Council note the report by the Infrastructure Assessment Coordinator to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 11 April 2017 and approve the Desired Standards of
Service (DSS) for the stormwater network provided in Attachment 1 for proceeding with the new
Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) under The Noosa Plan 2006.
Ordinary Meeting, 18 May 2017, Item 1, Page 6
That Council note the report by the Infrastructure Assessment Coordinator to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 9 May 2017 regarding the review of the Public Parks and
Land for Community Facilities network required for the new Local Government Infrastructure Plan
(LGIP) under The Noosa Plan 2006 and:
A. Approve the Plans for Trunk Infrastructure (PFTI) Maps provided in Attachment 3 to the
report;
B. Approve the Schedule of Works (SOW) provided in Attachment 2 noting that the cost
estimates may be refined following completion of the excel SOW Model; and
C. Note that further amendments will be made to the SOW and incorporated in a subsequent
LGIP to be prepared for the new Planning Scheme that reflects Council’s adopted Sport
and Active Recreation Plan and Recreation Parks Plan.
Ordinary Meeting, 20 July 2017, Item 6, Page 7
That Council note the report by the Infrastructure Assessment Coordinator to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 11 July 2017 regarding the review of the Stormwater
network required for the new Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) under The Noosa
Plan 2006 and approve:
A. The Plans for Trunk Infrastructure (PFTI) Maps provided in Attachment 2 to the report
noting the service catchments being limited to the Priority Infrastructure Area (PIA) area for
preparing the SOW model;
B. The Stormwater Network Future Projects for including in the LGIP Schedule of
Works(SOW) provided in Attachment 1 noting that the base costs estimates will be refined
following completion of the excel SOW Model; and
C. Note that further amendments will be made to the SOW and incorporated in a subsequent
LGIP to be prepared for the new Planning Scheme that reflects Council’s further network
planning.
Page 9 of 42
Section 10
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Ordinary Meeting, 20 July 2017, Item 7, Page 8
That Council note the report by the Infrastructure Assessment Coordinator to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 11 July 2017 regarding the review of the Transport
network required for the new Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) under The Noosa
Plan 2006 and approve:
A. The Plans for Trunk Infrastructure (PFTI) Maps provided in Attachment 2 to the report
noting that the locality sub-catchments will be combined into two larger transport
catchments for the Noosa Coastal Area and the Noosa Hinterland Area when preparing the
SOW model;
B. The Transport Network Future Projects for including in the LGIP Schedule of Works(SOW)
provided in Attachment 1 noting that the base costs estimates will be refined following
completion of the excel SOW Model; and
C. Note that further amendments will be made to the SOW and incorporated in a subsequent
LGIP to be prepared for the new Planning Scheme that reflects Council’s further network
planning.
Ordinary Meeting, 21 September 2017, Item 8, Page 7
That Council note the report by the Infrastructure Assessment Coordinator to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 12 September 2017 regarding the remaining
requirements for the Schedule of Works (SOW) Model for the new Local Government
Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) under The Noosa Plan 2006 and approve:
A. The methodology used to determine existing trunk infrastructure network items from
Council’s Geographic Information System (GIS) and current replacement costs obtained
from Council’s Financial Asset Register;
B. The Generic Land Valuation prepared by CBRE Valuations Pty Limited dated
February2012 provided in Attachment 1 to the report and indexed to the LGIP June 2014
base date as the basis for applying a uniform generic land cost in the Schedule of Works
Model (SOW) for all existing and future land;
C. A minor amendment to the Schedule of Works (SOW) future items for the Public Parks&
Land for Community Facilities Network provided in Attachment 2 to the report noting that
the cost estimates will be refined following completion of the excel SOW Model;
D. The LGIP Briefing Note provided in Attachment 3 to the report providing the basis for the
Infrastructure Network Demand Assumptions and Conversions; and
E. Note that following completion of the SOW model, draft LGIP and Independent Reviewer’s
first review, a further report on the complete draft LGIP will be presented for Council’s
consideration and adoption to proceed to the Minister’s first State review.
Ordinary Meeting, 16 November 2017, Item 3, Page 4
That Council note the report by the Infrastructure Assessment Coordinator to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 November 2017 and:
A. Resolve to amend the planning scheme for the Shire of Noosa in accordance with the
proposed LGIP amendment as outlined in the report; and
B. Request the Chief Executive Officer to:
i. Write to the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning requesting a review of the
proposed draft LGIP and the Minister’s approval to commence public consultation
on the proposed amendment;
ii. Make amendments to the draft LGIP if required by the Minister to gain approval; and
iii. Proceed to public consultation of the draft LGIP on receiving the Minister’s
approval.
Page 10 of 42
Section 11
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Finance & Risk
Council needs to amend its current Priority Infrastructure Plan (PIP) to a Local Government
Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) by 30 June 2018 to continue issuing infrastructure charges and impose
conditions about trunk infrastructure on development.
Since January 2014 to March 2018, $9,542,665 has been collected in infrastructure charges
equating to a current average of $187,111 per month or $2,245,333 per annum. The 2017/2018
budget has conservatively estimated the infrastructure charges revenue at $1,867,359.
A long term risk of LGIPs is the commitment ultimately made to provide future infrastructure at
the desired standards of service to meet development growth.
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Public Consultation from 6 March to 18 April 2018
Internal Consultation
Principal Strategic Planner (casual), Strategic Land Use Planning
Manager, Infrastructure Planning, Design & Delivery
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Chief Executive Officer Community Services Corporate Services
Executive Officer Community Development Financial Services
Executive Support Community Facilities ICT
Libraries & Galleries Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws Property
Waste & Environmental Health Revenue Services
Executive Services X Environment & Sustainable Development X Infrastructure Services
Community Engagement Building & Plumbing Services Asset Management
Customer Service X Development Assessment Buildings and Facilities
Governance Economic Development Civil Operations
People and Culture Environmental Services Disaster Management
X Strategic Land Use Planning X Infrastructure Planning,
Design and Delivery
Page 11 of 42
Section 12
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 12 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
ATTACHMENT 1
Ke The Hon Cameron Dick MP
kY — Minister for State Development,
cownmet’ Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning
1 William Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
Our ref: MC17/5064 PO Box 15009 City East
Your ref: Draft LGIP Minister Review 1 Queensland 4002 Australia
Telephone +617 3719 7200
Email [email protected]
www.dsdmip.qld.gov.au
02 MAR 2018
Councillor Tony Wellington
Mayor
Noosa Shire Council
PO Box 141
TEWANTIN QLD 4565
Dear Councillor ington a )
Thank you for the Noosa Shire Council's (the council) letter of 20 November 2017 to the then
Minister for Infrastructure and Planning, the Honourable Jackie Trad MP, providing the
proposed Local Government Infrastructure Plan (proposed LGIP) for review and approval to
proceed to public consultation. As the Minister for State Development, Manufacturing,
Infrastructure and Planning, | am now responding.
| congratulate the council in taking the initiative to prepare a LGIP for its community. This is
an important step to ensure the council continues to have the ability to levy charges or
impose trunk infrastructure conditions on its future development approvals.
The proposed LGIP has been assessed against the requirements of the repealed Sustainable
Planning Act 2009 and for compliance with the Statutory Guideline 01/16: Making and
amending local planning instruments (MALPI) and the Statutory Guideline 03/14: Local
government infrastructure plans.
In accordance with MALPI, | am pleased to advise the council may now proceed to publicly
consult on the proposed LGIP revised version, received on 22 December 2017. The approval
is subject to ministerial conditions which are contained in enclosure 1. Further advice to assist
the council in revising and refining the proposed LGIP is contained in enclosure 2.
| note the council was previously granted an extension to 30 June 2018 to have a LGIP in
place, otherwise it will not be able to continue to levy infrastructure charges or impose
infrastructure conditions under section 111 of the Planning Act 2076 (Planning Act).
As such, | strongly urge the council to prioritise the finalisation of the proposed LGIP to
ensure it may continue to levy infrastructure charges. The Department of State Development,
Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning (the department) is committed to working with the
council, as a matter of priority, to help the finalisation and adoption of the proposed LGIP.
Page 12 of 42Section 13
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 13 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
If you require any further information, please contact Mr Garth Nolan, Planning Manager,
Planning and Development Services — South, in the department, on (07) 5352 9710 or
[email protected], who will be pleased to assist.
Yours sincerely
\ WWW /Llr 4 4
CAMERON DICK MP
Minister for State Development, Manufacturing,
Infrastructure and Planning
Encs (2)
Page 13 of 42Section 14
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 14 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Enclosure 1
MINISTERIAL CONDITIONS FOR THE NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL’S PROPOSED LOCAL
GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN PURSUANT TO SECTION 117 OF THE
SUSTAINABLE PLANNING ACT 2009
Pursuant to section 117 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, | hereby advise the Noosa
Shire Council that it may proceed to public consultation on the proposed Local Government
Infrastructure Plan (proposed LGIP), revised version as submitted on 22 December 2017,
subject to the following conditions being complied with prior to commencing public
consultation:
1. | Amend the relevant components of the proposed LGIP, the schedule of works and
maps to identify and apportion transport works by catchments by including the nine
locality sub-catchments as the service catchments.
2. Amend DTMR-1 to R-17 and its establishment cost to $0 (Demaining Agreement April
2000) and delete DTMR-2 to DTMR-8 from the proposed LGIP.
3. | Remove reference to Translink from future works items 319775 and 319776 from the
proposed LGIP.
4. | Remove the future park item 8/14 (Noosaville Foreshore Land Use Master Plan) from
the parks and land for community facilities network from the proposed LGIP.
St
Dated this | day of APL; 2018
lw
Minister for State Development, Manufacturin
Infrastructure and Plannin
Page 14 of 42Section 15
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 15 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Enclosure 2
FURTHER ADVICE FOR THE NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL’S CONSIDERATION OF THE
PROPOSED LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN (LGIP)
The following further advice is given to the Noosa Shire Council for its consideration, so that
it may further revise and refine the proposed LGIP:
1. A valuable output of a LGIP is information about the cash flow projections which
compares future infrastructure charges revenue to expenditure. In this regard, the state
sets the maximum charges that a local government may levy for the provision of trunk
infrastructure. Where expenditure exceeds the revenue from infrastructure charges,
the local government has to consider options to manage it. Any shortfall in charges
revenue to cover expenditure will have to be recovered from other sources such as
rates.
2. The LGIP preparation process seeks to take into account the inter-relationships and
alignment between the LGIP, future growth, Asset Management Plans (AMP) and
Long-Term Financial Forecasts (LTFF). Within this framework, local governments are
required to strategically consider and manage the provision and funding of trunk
infrastructure in their local government area, in an efficient and financially sustainable
manner. To achieve this over time, local governments are encouraged to undertake
regular reviews to ensure ongoing alignment of its LGIP, AMP and LTFF.
Page 15 of 42Section 16
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 16 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
STAFF REVIEW - LGIP SUBMISSIONS (6 March to 18 April 2018) ATTACHMENT 2
pene | Recemee Pm Frereatton
Submission Date Submission Details Staff Review Staff
8/03/2018 |The submission refers to earlier The submission relates to the Noosaville
5 1 1 2 1 13 1908 504 138 25 87 LGIP-PIA
5 1 1 2 1 14 2058 504 64 31 96 Map
5 1 1 2 1 15 2133 504 31 25 69 8”
5 1 1 2 1 16 2180 504 82 25 96 which
5 1 1 2 1 17 2275 504 92 25 96 shows
5 1 1 2 1 18 2378 504 45 25 95 the
5 1 1 2 1 19 2434 504 156 25 96 referenced
5 1 1 2 1 20 2602 510 65 19 96 area
5 1 1 2 1 21 2678 504 61 25 96 land
5 1 1 2 1 22 2751 510 51 19 96 use
5 1 1 2 1 23 2812 510 71 19 95 zone
5 1 1 2 1 24 2895 510 34 19 96 as
5 1 1 2 1 25 3042 504 40 25 95 No
5 1 1 2 1 26 3093 504 108 31 95 change
5 1 1 2 1 27 3211 506 26 23 95 to
5 1 1 2 1 28 3248 504 45 25 95 the
4 1 1 2 2 0 483 545 2825 31 -1
5 1 1 2 2 1 483 546 33 30 96 by
5 1 1 2 2 2 527 546 81 24 63 direct
5 1 1 2 2 3 651 545 236 31 78 |correspondence
5 1 1 2 2 4 900 545 80 25 96 made
5 1 1 2 2 5 991 547 27 23 93 to
5 1 1 2 2 6 1029 545 154 25 90 Councilon
5 1 1 2 2 7 1198 545 32 25 26 19
5 1 1 2 2 8 1285 545 140 25 0 |Attached
Housing” under The Noosa Plan 2006. Draft LGIP (v2) as
email February 2017 in relation to review of The publicly advertised
Noosa Plan that commenced for the New |Under the Statutory Guideline 03/14, this draft LGIP has its base date set at mid-2014 and therefore shows the land __|with its base date
Planning Scheme. use zoning under The Noosa Plan 2006 current at that time. mid-2014 under
the current Noosa
It resubmits the earlier request that a Future changes made to land use zones would only be shown in future LGIPs updated to a new base date that would |Plan 2006.
change be made to the land use zoning __|include the particular planning scheme details c urrent at that time.
from the current Attached
5 1 1 2 9 5 1049 834 131 31 91 Housing”
5 1 1 2 9 6 1191 836 26 23 96 to
4 1 1 2 10 0 651 875 2253 32 -1
5 1 1 2 10 1 651 876 179 31 80 “Community
5 1 1 2 10 2 841 875 138 25 82 Services
for a particular This submission does not relate to any LGIP issue under the current Noosa Plan 2006 but instead relates to a
area on Eumundi Noosa Rd between proposal for drafting of the New Planing Scheme that remains a
5 1 1 2 11 18 2248 917 69 24 96 work
5 1 1 2 11 19 2328 917 23 24 96 in
5 1 1 2 11 20 2364 917 146 31 94 progress. However, the submission has
Headland Drive and the Good Shepherd |been forwarded to the Strategic Planning Team managing that project for further consideration in development of the
Lutheran College in Noosaville. New Planning Scheme.
2 16/04/2018 |The submission is a request to bring This submission relates to a future sport area proposed for Pomona identified as item 12 on LG/P-PFTI
5 1 1 2 14 27 2834 1119 90 25 96 Public
5 1 1 2 14 28 2934 1119 85 24 93 Parks
5 1 1 2 14 29 3042 1119 40 25 84 |No
5 1 1 2 14 30 3093 1119 108 31 96 change
5 1 1 2 14 31 3211 1120 26 24 95 to
5 1 1 2 14 32 3247 1119 46 24 96 the
4 1 1 2 15 0 494 1160 2814 32 -1
5 1 1 2 15 1 494 1160 32 31 96 by
5 1 1 2 15 2 538 1160 58 25 93 mail
5 1 1 2 15 3 650 1160 109 25 0 {forward
5 1 1 2 15 4 770 1160 46 25 96 the
5 1 1 2 15 5 826 1160 87 31 96 timing
5 1 1 2 15 6 925 1160 28 25 96 of
5 1 1 2 15 7 962 1166 16 19 96 a
5 1 1 2 15 8 989 1160 84 25 96 future
5 1 1 2 15 9 1084 1162 90 29 96 sports
5 1 1 2 15 10 1184 1166 64 19 77 area
5 1 1 2 15 11 1287 1161 19 25 47 |&
5 1 1 2 15 12 1317 1161 63 25 96 LCF
5 1 1 2 15 13 1389 1161 64 31 95 Map
5 1 1 2 15 14 1464 1161 31 25 91 5”
5 1 1 2 15 15 1510 1161 52 25 96 and
5 1 1 2 15 16 1574 1161 114 25 96 detailed
5 1 1 2 15 17 1701 1161 22 24 96 in
5 1 1 2 15 18 1740 1161 91 25 95 Table
15.17 - Public parks and land for community facilities schedule of works" as Draft LGIP (v2) as
project proposed for the Pomona area item Map
5 1 1 2 16 9 1444 1202 96 25 93 5/12 that is projected to occur during the 2021-2026 estimate time period. The submission also refers to |publicly advertised
and for new play facilities to be included |a 1993 development proposal of Coorora Creek park that did not proceed and in its current form, is a designated
in Cunningham Park in Pomona. trunk district recreational park.
Council's budget must cater for all services provided by Council which includes (but not limited to) provision of new
infrastructure, upgrades and mainenance of existing infrastructure (for both trunk and non-trunk) and many other
operational and community service requirements. The capital works programs must also be financially affordable and
in this regard, Council's Finance, Asset Management and Infrastructure Planning, Design & Delivery deparments,
have carefully considered the proposed timing for this and all other projects in unison.
The provision of infrastructure also often lags desired provision due to financial and other constraints.
Provision of new and costly infrastructure such as this, often requires multiple reviews, extensive consultation and
careful scruitiny over a number of years before final delivery. To simply bring forward this particular project having a
large estmated cost of $5+ million, would likely impact other project priorities planned for the shire at the current time.
The proposed LGIP's timeframe has maintained the current PIP's timeframe and the request to bring forward the
delivery of this proposed future sports area is therfore not supported.
The second request for additional play facilities in Cunningham Park relates to a non-trunk local park. It is therfore
not applicable to this LGIP for trunk infrastructure provision at the higher order district and shire wide functions.
However, this request has been forwarded to the Infrastructure Planning, Design & Delivery deparment for their
assessment and consideration however is not a current priority.
Page 16 of 42Section 17
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 17 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
STAFF REVIEW - LGIP SUBMISSIONS (6 March to 18 April 2018)
Submission Date Submission Details Staff Review Staff
No. Received Recommendation
3 16/04/2018 |The submission requests an additional This submission is similar to earlier correspondence to Council dated 12 March 2018 (ref: RM2018/04897) where No change to the
by mail alternate pathway be provided to the Council's Infrastructure Planning, Design & Delivery Manager responded on 19 March 2018 advising: There
5 1 1 1 6 23 2905 547 45 17 0 are
5 1 1 1 6 24 2961 547 36 17 0 no
5 1 1 1 6 25 3044 540 69 24 58 |Draft
5 1 1 1 6 26 3124 540 73 24 89 LGIP
5 1 1 1 6 27 3209 540 55 30 96 (v2)
5 1 1 1 6 28 3275 547 33 17 96 as
4 1 1 1 7 0 660 581 2490 31 -1
5 1 1 1 7 1 660 581 119 24 96 Pomona
5 1 1 1 7 2 791 581 177 31 96 showground
5 1 1 1 7 3 982 581 21 24 95 in
5 1 1 1 7 4 1017 581 47 24 96 lieu
5 1 1 1 7 5 1077 581 33 30 95 of,
5 1 1 1 7 6 1123 588 28 17 94 or
5 1 1 1 7 7 1163 581 21 24 94 in
5 1 1 1 7 8 1290 581 81 24 95 funds
5 1 1 1 7 9 1382 581 132 24 96 allocated
5 1 1 1 7 10 1523 581 24 24 96 in
5 1 1 1 7 11 1559 581 43 24 96 the
5 1 1 1 7 12 1615 581 119 24 96 2017/18
5 1 1 1 7 13 1743 581 122 24 96 financial
5 1 1 1 7 14 1873 588 67 24 96 year
5 1 1 1 7 15 1948 581 40 24 96 for
5 1 1 1 7 16 1995 581 125 31 96 pathway
5 1 1 1 7 17 2128 581 125 31 96 planning
5 1 1 1 7 18 2264 581 24 24 96 in
5 1 1 1 7 19 2299 581 129 24 94 Pomona.
5 1 1 1 7 20 2441 581 122 24 94 Pomona
5 1 1 1 7 21 2573 581 126 31 96 pathway
5 1 1 1 7 22 2706 581 126 31 96 planning
5 1 1 1 7 23 2842 581 71 24 96 does
5 1 1 1 7 24 3043 581 107 31 96 publicly
4 1 1 1 8 0 658 622 2543 31 -1
5 1 1 1 8 1 658 622 112 24 96 addition
5 1 1 1 8 2 782 623 35 29 96 to,
5 1 1 1 8 3 830 622 156 31 96 completing
5 1 1 1 8 4 999 622 45 24 96 the
5 1 1 1 8 5 1056 622 141 31 96 remaining
5 1 1 1 8 6 1291 629 105 24 95 appear
5 1 1 1 8 7 1403 622 24 24 95 in
5 1 1 1 8 8 1439 622 43 24 96 the
5 1 1 1 8 9 1494 622 67 24 96 draft
5 1 1 1 8 10 1570 622 17 24 96 5
5 1 1 1 8 11 1596 629 67 24 96 year
5 1 1 1 8 12 1671 622 96 31 96 capital
5 1 1 1 8 13 1777 622 85 24 96 works
5 1 1 1 8 14 1871 629 121 24 95 program
5 1 1 1 8 15 2005 622 24 24 96 in
5 1 1 1 8 16 2041 622 44 24 95 the
5 1 1 1 8 17 2097 622 154 24 95 2022/2023
5 1 1 1 8 18 2262 622 122 24 95 financial
5 1 1 1 8 19 2392 629 70 24 96 year,
5 1 1 1 8 20 2476 622 106 31 96 subject
5 1 1 1 8 21 2591 623 26 23 96 to
5 1 1 1 8 22 2628 622 102 31 96 budget
5 1 1 1 8 23 2739 622 210 24 95 deliberations.
advertised.
missing link to the Pomona school.
The submission relates to the pathway project identified as PW-712 on LGIP-PFTI
5 1 1 1 10 13 2540 705 140 30 95 Transport
5 1 1 1 10 14 2688 705 64 30 95 Map
5 1 1 1 10 15 2763 705 31 24 81 5”
5 1 1 1 10 16 2811 705 51 24 96 and
5 1 1 1 10 17 2874 705 113 24 96 detailed
5 1 1 1 10 18 3001 705 22 24 95 in
4 1 1 1 11 0 1294 747 1708 30 -1
5 1 1 1 11 1 1294 747 90 24 96 Table
15.16 - Transport network schedule of works" for completing the final missing link along Clay Street (includes
Marquee Lane i.e. Clay St-West) to the Summit Road intersection of the school. It is not a proposal for duplication of
existing pathways on Council managed land however the final design may take into account some of the existing
paths on school property pending further consultation with the school.
In relation to the comment made regarding pedestrian access from the town centre to the showgrounds, the existing
designated trunk pathway provides access from Factory Street through Cooroora Creek Park and then along the full
Pavillion Street frontage of the showground site and therfore already serves this purpose.
The alternative proposal being in addition to the existing route, is considered unnecessary for the current LGIP
planning horizon however may be reconsidered further in the next 5 year LGIP review.
The assertion made by the submitter that completing a pathway missing link for the benefit of school children for
regular use on a daily basis is of lesser importance and priority than for an additional alternative access to that
already provided to a particular site is not supported.
4 16/04/2018 |The submission relates only to This submission has no relevance to the proposed LGIP under the current Noosa Plan 2006. No change to the
by mail |"commercial building design guidelines However, the submission has been forwarded to the Strategic Planning Team for further consideration in Draft LGIP (v2) as
for Pomona”. development of the New Planning Scheme. publicly advertised
5 17/04/2016 |The submission suggests The
5 1 1 1 26 7 1289 1643 63 24 89 This
5 1 1 1 26 8 1363 1643 162 24 96 submission
5 1 1 1 26 9 1538 1643 70 24 96 does
5 1 1 1 26 10 1621 1644 48 31 96 not
5 1 1 1 26 11 1679 1643 80 24 96 relate
5 1 1 1 26 12 1770 1643 104 31 96 directly
5 1 1 1 26 13 1884 1644 27 23 96 to
5 1 1 1 26 14 1922 1650 16 17 96 a
5 1 1 1 26 15 1949 1643 109 31 93 specific
5 1 1 1 26 16 2070 1643 73 24 92 LGIP
5 1 1 1 26 17 2156 1643 74 24 96 issue
5 1 1 1 26 18 2243 1643 44 24 96 but
5 1 1 1 26 19 2297 1650 118 24 96 appears
5 1 1 1 26 20 2426 1644 26 23 96 to
5 1 1 1 26 21 2464 1643 34 24 96 be
5 1 1 1 26 22 2510 1650 73 17 96 more
5 1 1 1 26 23 2594 1643 29 24 95 of
5 1 1 1 26 24 2631 1650 17 17 96 a
5 1 1 1 26 25 2660 1643 108 31 95 product
5 1 1 1 26 26 2779 1643 142 31 96 marketing
5 1 1 1 26 27 3044 1643 38 24 96 No
5 1 1 1 26 28 3094 1643 107 31 96 change
5 1 1 1 26 29 3211 1644 26 23 96 to
5 1 1 1 26 30 3247 1643 46 24 96 the
4 1 1 1 27 0 481 1685 2827 30 -1
5 1 1 1 27 1 481 1685 42 23 94 via
5 1 1 1 27 2 538 1685 81 23 74 Your
|amendment should include the allowance jexercise for consideration of alternative construction design solutions. It has therefore been forwarded to the Draft LGIP (v2) as
Say Noosa" |of synthetic turf to Nature strips as Infrastructure Planning, Design & Delivery and Strategic Planning Teams for consideration if suitable for citing in a publicly advertised
website __ [installed correctly will not cause trip future planning scheme policy on engineering standards.
portal hazards and will require very little
maintenance."
Page 17 of 42Section 18
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 18 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
ATTACHMENT 3
Submission No. 1
7 March 2018
Mayor Tony Wellington
Deputy Mayor Frank Wilkie
Councillor Ingrid Jackson
Councillor Jess Glasgow
Councillor Joe Jurisevic
Councillor Frank Pardon
Councillor Brian Stockwell
Dear Mayor & Councillors
Re: The Noosa Plan — Proposed Amendment of Part 15
We own the property located at 89 Eumundi Road where i operates her Physiotherapy
Practice. The practice has been operating since early 2004.
We wrote to all of the Councillors on 19 February 2017 at the time the review of the Noosa
Plan was commencing proposing a change of zone. The only response received was from
Ingrid Jackson who commented that our proposal was “logically stated and reasonable and
is a good fit with my support for a health hub”.
After examining the “Proposed Amendment of Part 15” on your website it is apparent that
our concerns have not been addressed about the precinct that we are part of, as it remains as
“Detached Housing”. It is our opinion that this is an unrealistic and inappropriate category
and it would have been more appropriate to have this as “Community Services’ in
recognition of the existing uses within the precinct. The issue of zoning to this precinct has
been a long, confusing and stressful process over many years. If the Council rejects our
proposal for a change of zone we would very much appreciate a logical and clear explanation
of your determination. Our views are documented below.
Over the years that we have owned the property the zoning applied has been an ongoing and
contentious issue and has been changed several times. We fully appreciate that there is a
process that individual property owners can follow with Council to seek a change of use
(MCU). However, it is also suggested that there is a more productive and efficient way to
manage the zoning for the properties in this strip and that is to recognize the characteristics of
the Precinct (viz. 87 to 109 Eumundi Rd and hereafter referred to as the “Precinct”) and
incorporate these into the Amended Noosa Plan.
The following points are recorded for your consideration and to highlight the case for this
Precinct zoning to be amended from “Attached Housing” to “Community Services”:
e Our business (Physiotherapy) is categorized as Allied Health.
Page 18 of 42Section 19
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 19 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission No. 1 (continued)
e A number of other businesses in the precinct have been operating for over 20 years.
These include childcare, commercial office space and catering business.
¢ Our business employs three people and could employ more if we had better business
certainty. It is impossible to have business certainty and business planning without
security of tenure.
¢ Our business creates local employment opportunities and a flow on effect to the
economy.
¢ Our business attracts mainly seniors, disabled, and chronic disease management
patients. Many have significant mobility issues and use wheelie walkers, wheelchairs,
crutches and walking aids. We also treat neurological patients including conditions
such as strokes, Parkinson's and peripheral neuropathy. An important treatment for
many conditions is gait re-education which requires a large safe space. We have
patients with balance and vestibular issues. Several of our patients have hearing and
vision impairment and incontinence and may attend with a Carer. We have also been
for many years a primary Physiotherapy provider for patients at Noosa Respite
Centre, Wallace Park. Therefore, busy car parks, lifts, stairs and small spaces are
inappropriate (in fact impossible) for our business. E.g. Noosa Professional Centre is
completely unsuitable for our patient profile.
e Since the inception of Medicare funded Chronic Disease Management Program we
were probably the only Physio practice on the coast with no gap fees. This year we
have been forced to charge a small gap fee in order to keep our practice viable.
e As you would be aware there is a significant shortage in Noosa of affordable
commercial space with substantial gross floor area, easy car parking, high visibility
and easy access. Ours and other Allied Health businesses targeting the Noosa
population profile of seniors needs these characteristics to operate successfully.
e Our business draws in the local, national, international and the tourist health dollar.
Businesses need good location exposure to continue to attract these patients.
e Noosa Council needs to urgently empower local health professional businesses in
order to counter the inevitable draw of health care and the health dollar to the
Sunshine Coast University Hospital and surrounds of Birtinya, Kawana, etc. Our
location and business is compatible with the location and business of Noosa Hospital
nearby in Goodchap Street. Our location may even be suitable in the future for
hospital based specialist and allied health rooms with associated car parking so that
hospital space can be freed up for more urgently required bed space with associated
car parking. I believe with genuine support from Council, Noosa could be a model for
best practice, community friendly, quality health care.
e Our business does not impact on adjoining residential neighbours at our rear with loud
music, dog barking, and party noise etc as residential may do.
e We believe our business offers a noise buffer for the residents of Noosa Waters
behind us without depriving them of the public transport and other facilities that
Eumundi Road offers. Due to our location within the community, a number of our
clients (especially from the school or Noosa Waters) will walk or cycle to our
practice.
e We believe that our section of the busy and (traffic) noisy Eumundi Road is
unsuitable for residential and if it was to remain zoned “as is” there is a strong
possibility it would develop into low standard residential precinct. This would be
unfortunate for a main entrance road to a world class tourist destination.
Page 19 of 42Section 20
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 20 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission No. 1 (continued)
e Throughout our 14 years in business we have never had issues with traffic flow,
inflow / outflow or car parking. I cannot recall a single vehicle incident involving
patients entering or exiting our property.
e Inthe Noosa Plan “discussion paper” in the Noosaville section there was an Outcome
to create a health hub to cluster medical and health services. It is suggested that our
“Precinct” could fit perfectly into this proposal for many of the reasons we have
already stated. Particular elements that make this a perfect fit include:
o Proximity to the Hospital
o Access to public transport
o Easy pedestrian, vehicle and disability access
© Proximity to Wallace Park
o High visibility
o Low impact to adjoining residential areas and therefore a good fit
o Would not require any resumptions of residential property with potential for
property owner’s resistance and associated complications.
o Would be an extension of the clustering of medical and allied health services
already in the vicinity (in Goodchap Street).
We hope you consider the information and points we have raised in this letter and are
influenced to support our position. We would welcome any feedback from Council and
would be happy to meet with you should you wish to discuss the matter further.
Yours sincerely
ee
Page 20 of 42Section 21
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 21 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission No. 1 (continued)
7 13 8 s Headlan
15 * ;
“Bw A 89 Eumundi Nogsa Roac
“ee . i 12 min drive - hfime »
p AY , 18 9
13 16 93 y
1 a © 14 12
: : weetness Contained (J) .
S tai
ad - w Poolside Noosa
das ~ , 17
lf
“O. circuit Regatta Circuit |
“Ox, el :
2 10 L
co 33 ce 7
” @ f
. 1 Plas
. ma Regar,.
Lutheran Church = , et Re,
cRehab@ 2 : ’
on Shepherd 9
> T-Marts Lutheran College ' '
lansaville
Page 21 of 42Section 22
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 22 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission 2
Mr Brett de Chastel fe} 16
Noosa Council iA had 2 018 fs
Chief Executive Officer A
P.O. Box 141 Couns
Tewantin yoni </
QLD 4565 CITT)
Re: Your Say Noosa — Proposed amendments to the Noosa Plan
Dear Mr de Chastel
The opportunity for individual ratepayers to comment on the proposed amendments to The Noosa Plan
through the Your Say feedback process is welcomed.
The purpose and general effect of the current amendment under consideration is to:
e Amend Part 15 and introduce a new Schedule 9 of The Noosa Plan planning scheme to update
the current Priority Infrastructure Plan (PIP) with a new Local Government Infrastructure
Plan (LGIP) prepared in accordance with Statutory Guideline 03/14.
This letter concerns that part of the major infrastructure planning that relates to the provision of
sporting ovals and associated facilities at Pomona. The lists of proposed infrastructure projects
identifies at Map 5 (12) a ‘future sports area’ at Pomona involving purchase of six hectares of land at an
estimated cost of $2.55 million. Field development and amenities would cost a further $2.58 million.
The work is scheduled to proceed in 2021-26.
This matter (of sporting facilities at Pomona) has been before the council previously, resulting in delays
in proceeding to implementation and, subsequently, requiring new and additional planning to be
undertaken. We face the prospect that other priorities might mean that the proposed won’t will occur
during the five-year period beginning in 2021-22.
In light of the known shortage of sports ovals and facilities at Pomona, I request that the schedule of
works be altered so that purchase of land for sports facilities at Pomona be brought forward to the
2020-21 financial year (one year earlier) , because that particular time horizon would require work to
start now on budgets, location and design.
It would be unfortunate if Council delayed further action on much-needed sports facilities at Pomona.
- In1993, Noosa Council prepared its Cooroora Creek Park Development Plan that included a
multi-purpose oval for the town, following an investigation of need. That proposal did not
proceed at that time. (Attachment A)
- InJanuary 2006, Council adopted the Noosa Park Strategy that reeommended that up to 6ha
of land be purchased to the north of town in the vicinity of the Noosa District High School
Junior Campus for sports fields. Nothing has happened since. (Attachment B)
- In 2014-15, a community survey identified the need for a new sports oval(s), reinforcing a
finding of the Heart of Pomona Committee, presented to Council in a report entitled Pomona:
Inspiring Place. Council gave an undertaking at the time that this document would be
considered in the context of The Noosa Plan review.
Page 22 of 42Section 23
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 23 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission 2 (continued)
The Noosa Park Strategy 2006, which Council commissioned and endorsed, surveyed sporting
facilities in ‘Locality 5’ (Pomona and District) and stated that:
- The area of sport parks in Locality 5 is well below performance standards in 2005, and will
worsen by 2016. (Refer page 75.)
- The area for indoor sport and recreation facilities in Locality 5 is just above performance
standards in 2005, and will drop below in 2016.
Having been advised in 2006 that land devoted to sports facilities at Pomona was ‘well below
performance standards’, Noosa Council does not plan to rectify the problem until up to 20 years beyond
when this ‘unacceptable’ notification was delivered in an official report. Likewise, there is a need for
indoor sport and recreation facilities at Pomona; the current facilities having dropped below
performance standards in 2016, based upon the 2005 projections and population growth data.
The Noosa Park Strategy 2006 also recommended that Level 1 play facilities be incorporated into
Cunningham Park at Pomona. That project appears to have fallen off Council’s radar. Will it be re-
introduced to the forward works schedule?
The situation at Pomona regarding a lack of sporting facilities (ovals and indoor facilities) is
exacerbated by the fact that the one single sportsground in the town is devoted exclusively to the local
AFL football club. Of course, not all sportspersons at Pomona wish to play AFL football, so they must
travel outside the town to access Soccer and Rugby League grounds, or a cricket pitch. For children, it is
impossible for them to ride their bicycle to Cooran or Cooroy, where these facilities are located.
The future sporting needs of Pomona, first identified by Council in 1993, remains unfulfilled in 2018
and it is proposed not to finish addressing them until 2026. That is a timeframe of 33 years. Thirty-
three years.
I request that Noosa Council brings forward to 2020 a start on its $5.1 million plan for upgraded
sporting facilities at Pomona — ovals and indoor sports amenities — within the LGIP under the proposed
amendments to The Noosa Plan; and complete those works in a three-year timeframe (2020-21 to
2022-2023). Such an objective is achievable, I submit, within the context and timeframes of the Noosa
Plan Review.
Yours sincerely
12 April 2018
Page 23 of 42Section 24
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 24 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission 2 (continued) |
: Services - 8th J o5\ Page 19
&£ 7 .
ALAR
a3 “BY Arh
Bese (HI
oH t > ] iN
cas é \. »
. : oh s § & é , N
( R} OBS e6 cs ne \\. ‘
SoH h ZW \
ee: al tie WW /
= iS : E 5 y \
eh wry SX
‘ Oe x ~ 2 WY
a a4 PEN
3 % \ 3
ss oa F ay z
me 2: <l| 8g |
X83 & a
a A Re A J wae
Be WI
* S W/~ FP
oN .
. = = ee
‘i ‘i, | \. s- “gs iin
ry.
49
Page 24 of 42Section 25
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 25 of 42
0 =
N
S °
“ lo
Fra -
= N
x Ca B a] &
<q - >
wo + ea ts a
AN £ ' - *
na a ‘ i é
ay &g a
3 3 3 : :
ea é 4 |
xe P ui fe
¥ > i. 3 @
= | Bera aa at oA
3 F se : Me . ED)
g 5S jie ivan
=) 1 +
: és aed
3 cs < )
2 8g Bs ml
3 wipers, a wa)
& eT OR eat
2 tS a mat
” : 4 | ~4 ;
7 i &
xq w sf
a 7 “iv he
2 iu i
= a ar
r : ea. .
= mS ae
W a “a
= — aif
=_l
<
Oo
Ww =
ou
” xSection 26
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 26 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Pe Submission 2 (continued)
r
NOOSA PARK STRATEGY: FINAL REPORT
3.5.9 Locality 5 Mary River Catchment: Changed Use
As a result of this review, the following park types were recommended for change in park use as indicated in Table 26.
Table 26: Recommended Changes to Park Use - Locality 5 Mary Cobh
oe -
River Catchment % > hs
* — Refer Open Space Plan Land Asset Register Update Technical Handover
* Most of the recommended changes to park use are because of the
presente of sesive vegetation.
PRewewion | [0 | Mayofthe enviromental pars ae long watery
arene la eS Le | ana rae nea eee meee tt
. other Council uses or possible disposal, as they are considered to have
[Indoor spor & recreation | 9 | 8 | __ittle value foe park related purposes.
P wavinsiiieeaial Ds in| SO We hs a
[Vacant &unspecified | 43 | | Tats
3.5.10 Locality 5 Mary River Catchment: Suggested Park Actions
Local Parks
* Some play facilities are dated and require refurbishment or replacement.
> ® umnanasliceass Pisa eueee aoa sealed for other Council purposes or considered for disposal.
* Cooran: There could be a need for additional local parks to the east (vicinity Map 42N9) and north cast (vicinity Map 42M6) depending on the direction of
urban expansion.
District & Shire-wide Recreation Parks
* Cooran: Improve car parking, signage and walking paths for Cooran Recreation Ground (Map 42K8).
> Sports Parks
ndoor Sport and Recreation
* Consider locating a multi-purpose hall to service the developing rural community in the Black Mountain area.
Trails
* Need to ensure that the south western sector is connected with the wider Noosa Trail Network.
Environmental Parks
* Provide signage and basic visitor facilities such as walking paths in more accessible parks.
Page 85
Page 26 of 42Section 27
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 27 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission 2 (continued)
NOOSA PARK STRATEGY: FINAL REPORT
3.5 LOCALITY 5: MARY RIVER CATCHMENT
3.5.1 Locality 5: Quantity (area) of each Park Type
Table 24 sets out the existing and anticipated requirement of land for recreation parks, sport parks and indoor sport and recreation facilities and identifies the
surplus/deficit for each park type, based on the resident population in 2001 and predicted population in 2016, as taken from the Draft Noosa Plan (2005). The
calculations are based on the performance criteria as set out in Section 1.3.7 of this report for urban and rural populations.
Table 24: Gap Analysis - Locality 5 Mary River Catchment
Resident Populations in
2001 and estimated
ess ise soo | Passe as] ston
016
Area (ha) required as per $37
performance criteria
esisinwenttay | OO a] toe | | oo aor] me]
2005 Surplus /- Deficit |/ #18163 FOS? ee isay |
(ha) ee 5 ee tal =
aarceat i] = above performance * below performance
5 | _ standard standard
Comments:
° Quantity (area) of Recreation Parks: The area of recreation parks in Locality $ is well above performance standards in 2005, and will remain so to 2016
4\ Page 78 IS
Page 27 of 42Section 28
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 28 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission 3
a2)
Gf co
Your reference: RM2018/04897 1 6
APR 2018
Mr Brett de Chastel \A, Noosa ¢,
Chief Executive Officer Recorgs™! b/
Noosa Council Q>
P.O. Box 141 let!
Tewantin
QLD 4565
Re: Proposed amendments to Noosa Plan — unsafe footpaths between Pomona town
centre and Pomona Showground
Dear Mr de Chastel
I wish to make a contribution to the Your Say consultative process regarding The Noosa Plan proposed
amendments.
I am grateful for recent advice from Mr Craig Eldridge, Council’s Infrastructure, Planning, Design and
Delivery Manager, who has stated that planning for additional pathways at Pomona appears in the
Noosa Council Capital Works Program in 2022-23. This advice was provided in the context of
correspondence forwarded to Council from the convenor of the Great Noosa Trail Walk and the Noosa
Show Society that, in their opinion, no safe pedestrian connections exist between the Pomona town
centre and the Pomona Showground. (Enclosures.)
Like many things at Pomona, discussion and lead times can be long. It is worthwhile mentioning also
that, on 2 December 2014, Mr Ross Sanderson, then Noosa Council’s Coordinator of Project Design and
Delivery, wrote these words to several members of the Pomona community, concerning the land
between Mill and Exhibition streets: “Council would not support the installation of any park-type
infrastructure in this flood-prone area apart from pathways that may fit with an overall pathway
network plan.” I take that as the council endorsing a shared pedestrian and bicycle path extension to
Exhibition Street and the Showground as part of an overall Pathway Network Plan for the town.
I note that Noosa Council proposes that pedestrian access facilities targetting children attending the
Noosa District High School Pomona Campus be provided in Clay Street at an estimated cost of
$70,000. This is included in the capital works forward planning.
I request that Council consider bringing forward works to improve pedestrian access to the Showground
in addition to, or in lieu of, the pedestrian access works proposed in Clay Street for the following
reasons:
¢ Pedestrian access between the town centre and the Showground has a higher priority than the
proposed Clay Street works; and
e Ifthe Clay Street pedestrian access is for the benefit of school children, why has the council not
taken into consideration the possibility of providing ‘missing links’ in the access pathways to the
school via Marquee Street (Clay Street- West) and Clay Street?
Essentially, I question why Noosa Council is considering duplicating a facility that already exists, by and
large, for the benefit of school children?
Box: SHY... R: Perl
Page 28 of 42Section 29
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 29 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission 3 (continued)
I submit that school children travelling to and from the Noosa District High School Pomona Campus
would derive a greater benefit from having an improved access to town from their school via better
pathway connections between the Showground and Factory Street built first.
To illustrate this point, I enclose an aerial view of Marquee Street and Clay Street at Pomona where the
existing pathway for school children has been provided on school property. The sealed path is shaded
and includes a concrete footbridge over the seasonal creek that flows from Cunningham Park. To make
this path more accessible to school children simply requires a concrete path near the driveway to the
Pomona Rural Futures Centre (Noosa Landcare offices) to the school boundary fence, a distance of
about three metres, and a gate fitted with a latch incorporated into the fence that gives access to the
path on the other side of the fence. That’s all. A path at the back of houses backing onto Cunningham
Park could be utilised to access the school by a short extension onto school land,
However, if Noosa Council proposes to join the extension of Marquee Street and Clay Street with a
pedestrian bridge over the Cunningham Park run-off, that is entirely appropriate to cater to the active
transport needs of adults within a walkable town (as opposed to school children).
I remind Council that a pedestrian path has been installed recently between Page Court and Meridan
Court, Pomona — at the other end of Cunningham Park. This could serve as an alternative way for
people to cross swampy ground at Cunningham Park, pending installation of any bridge at Clay Street,
thereby freeing up funds for a better pedestrian and bicycle connection between the Pomona town
centre and the Showground.
A concrete pedestrian path links Meridan Court and the Marquee Street extension at the back of houses,
[ urge Council to consider these link proposals to the existing path network on school grounds as cost-
effective alternatives, while directing money saved to the land acquisition and planning for a
pedestrian/bicycle path extension from Cooroora Creek Park to the Pomona Showground. I understand
that the Queensland Government makes available 100 per cent funding for detailed design of bicycle
path projects under the Cycle Network Local Government Grants Program, which supports the
Queensland Cycle Strategy of 2011-21 and its vision of ‘more cycling, more often on safe, direct and
connected routes’. Noosa Council would be eligible for 50-50 funding under the program.
Noosa Council's own Sustainable Transport Strategy gives high priority to favouring active transport
solutions over car-based solutions.
Yours sincerely
12 April 2018
Page 29 of 42Section 30
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 30 of 42
o
Saar eh F fee : = S Oo
m
ie ; = @ 2 | eB
| oh 2 3 g an = ©o 2 m
: a wz 2 : 2. g
We) 882s d ; © ¢|§
: wis e< = 2 : 3 < e Z
ae OE g 7/3
| 3 , ms a 2 o
- ai Ee 5
aoa Te) 8 aN; Pn ms ‘ m
¥ wo = F : A : x z
| ; i 3 oa 2] S 5
Va Be ss, g 7 oy ; 5
Bk > A oe.
| | fs :
VW 4 ; | :
wh . a z a3 = | .
f / fe bat 8 7 i ol e
Pie ea
es , is = ] oi i Ba | z
Ne Pa 8 : :
mt 4 iu : g
fo -—D O CY ere { 2 Fag ‘
Pu le 1G Ii ’ ~
x = 9 ¢ Ny :
ob Bt cn eE$ 44 ew.
See SYED Fa ES eee 12" E | »
ys A 9" is s 6C i; we ie G o
0 Siok ye x 7 we, y i eer: S = >
ws ; .s — >
2 § Ee i > + A ee 0
° & ao “\ 5 1 1 1 34 6 1330 2032 34 81 91 8
5 1 1 1 34 7 1536 2040 214 45 0 cio s . z
3 = &6& st & r
9 Bee. ee + — & 3
2 Ne ‘ PS 3
>
NOSection 31
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission 3 (continued)
Page 31 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission 3 (continued)
Walkways In Pomona - for Great Noosa Trail Walk Campers
at Showground
sol die _ weit ‘ —~ Reply |
SW Tue 5/09/2017, B14 PM
You
You forwarded this message on 27/02/2018 10:58 AM
great noosa trail walk
-
a journey through the natural and cultural landscape of “Noosa Country”
5 September 2017
via email: [email protected]
Heart of Pomona Committee
cf/- 1 Memorial Avenue
Pomona QLD 4568
Dear
Re: Walkways in Pomona between the Town Centre and the Showgrounds
| refer to the above matter and appreciate the work that Heart of Pamona is
undertaking concerning pathway networks in Pomona,
As you might recall the inaugural Great Noosa Trail Walk in 2013 included an
overnight stay in the Pomona Showgrounds, and the 100 odd walkers that year
attended local attractions as part of the itinerary including the Noosa Museum, a
show at the Majestic Theatre, as well as dining in local cafes and restaurants,
contributing to local economy and community expenditure.
The camping at the showgrounds was great, but unfortunately the walk in the dark
along the road shoulder too and from town and the showgrounds along Factory
Street was not very safe — particularly late at night, following a show at the theatre,
and perhaps after a few “beverages” being enjoyed.
Unfortunately as part of post event risk evaluation, | considered the risk too great for
walkers and the event and have not returned to Pomona,
| would support efforts to create a quality path network between the showgrounds
and the town centre, including effective road and rail crossings, and would certainly
revaluate the event to provide opportunity for walkers to enjoy an overnight stay in
Pomona as part of future events.
Best Regards
Page 31 of 42Section 32
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 32 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission 3 (continued)
Uf \ www.noosashowsociety.org.au
a PO Box 260, Pomona QLD 4568
, re Y oe? Se..
e ABN 61 579 630 926
EL) Scena ®& aa 4 1 1 1 8 0 629 850 1465 50 -1
5 1 1 1 8 1 504 848 86 14 34 nS
5 1 1 1 8 2 629 853 92 37 19 eee
5 1 1 1 8 3 904 850 36 48 21 ~~
5 1 1 1 8 4 1337 875 20 20 29 .
5 1 1 1 8 5 2063 873 31 27 62 a
4 1 1 1 9 0 564 877 1583 65 -1
5 1 1 1 9 1 564 877 178 37 9 tS
5 1 1 1 9 2 965 879 27 25 0 e
5 1 1 1 9 3 1015 900 20 19 0 *~e
5 1 1 1 9 4 1112 915 30 26 26 ~~
5 1 1 1 9 5 1231 903 30 27 79 e
5 1 1 1 9 6 1286 890 27 22 24 2
5 1 1 1 9 7 2105 895 42 42 33 ee
4 1 1 1 10 0 459 991 1506 49 -1
5 1 1 1 10 1 459 991 66 26 10 fe
5 1 1 1 10 2 1703 1007 20 29 94 2
5 1 1 1 10 3 1742 1008 111 31 94 March
5 1 1 1 10 4 1872 1009 93 31 96 2018
4 1 1 1 11 0 485 1084 547 36 -1
5 1 1 1 11 1 485 1084 104 30 96 Heart
5 1 1 1 11 2 603 1084 37 31 96 of
5 1 1 1 11 3 655 1086 149 31 95 Pomona
5 1 1 1 11 4 822 1087 210 33 95 Committee
4 1 1 1 12 0 483 1130 437 36 -1
5 1 1 1 12 1 483 1130 51 36 88 c/-
5 1 1 1 12 2 553 1131 16 30 95 1
5 1 1 1 12 3 590 1131 172 32 96 Memorial
5 1 1 1 12 4 779 1134 141 31 96 Avenue
4 1 1 1 13 0 483 1177 357 40 -1
5 1 1 1 13 1 483 1177 148 32 96 Pomona
5 1 1 1 13 2 650 1179 77 38 96 QLD
5 1 1 1 13 3 743 1181 97 30 96 4568
4 1 1 1 14 0 455 1267 213 46 -1
5 1 1 1 14 1 455 1267 89 46 96 Dear
4 1 1 1 15 0 454 1364 1609 58 -1
5 1 1 1 15 1 454 1364 56 31 96 Re:
5 1 1 1 15 2 531 1365 217 40 96 Walkways
5 1 1 1 15 3 765 1367 36 32 95 in
5 1 1 1 15 4 820 1370 171 31 96 Pomona
5 1 1 1 15 5 1009 1371 182 33 96 between
5 1 1 1 15 6 1208 1374 69 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 15 7 1291 1376 114 31 96 Town
5 1 1 1 15 8 1423 1378 141 32 96 Centre
5 1 1 1 15 9 1579 1380 77 31 96 and
5 1 1 1 15 10 1672 1380 69 33 96 the
5 1 1 1 15 11 1756 1382 307 40 95 Showgrounds.
4 1 1 1 16 0 448 1457 1637 59 -1
5 1 1 1 16 1 448 1457 70 32 96 The
5 1 1 1 16 2 536 1459 112 31 96 Noosa
5 1 1 1 16 3 667 1460 102 31 96 Show
5 1 1 1 16 4 787 1463 139 38 96 Society
5 1 1 1 16 5 944 1464 152 32 96 believes
5 1 1 1 16 6 1113 1467 77 31 96 that
5 1 1 1 16 7 1206 1467 59 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 16 8 1282 1472 142 34 96 present
5 1 1 1 16 9 1440 1472 181 38 95 pathways
5 1 1 1 16 10 1638 1473 85 32 96 from
5 1 1 1 16 11 1742 1475 61 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 16 12 1819 1476 96 32 96 show
5 1 1 1 16 13 1932 1480 153 36 96 grounds
4 1 1 1 17 0 449 1506 374 33 -1
5 1 1 1 17 1 449 1506 35 28 96 to
5 1 1 1 17 2 501 1506 91 30 96 town
5 1 1 1 17 3 610 1513 59 24 95 are
5 1 1 1 17 4 687 1507 136 32 95 unsafe.
4 1 1 1 18 0 449 1599 1600 52 -1
5 1 1 1 18 1 449 1599 36 30 96 In
5 1 1 1 18 2 504 1599 184 32 96 Exhibition
5 1 1 1 18 3 706 1603 122 37 96 street,
5 1 1 1 18 4 848 1604 221 37 95 pedestrians
5 1 1 1 18 5 1087 1606 89 33 96 have
5 1 1 1 18 6 1193 1610 34 29 96 to
5 1 1 1 18 7 1245 1616 96 25 96 cross
5 1 1 1 18 8 1357 1613 36 28 96 to
5 1 1 1 18 9 1410 1611 59 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 18 10 1486 1613 167 32 96 southern
5 1 1 1 18 11 1670 1615 75 32 96 side
5 1 1 1 18 12 1762 1616 38 31 96 of
5 1 1 1 18 13 1812 1617 61 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 18 14 1890 1620 109 30 96 street
5 1 1 1 18 15 2014 1622 35 29 96 to
4 1 1 1 19 0 447 1646 1646 58 -1
5 1 1 1 19 1 447 1652 124 25 96 access
5 1 1 1 19 2 588 1646 59 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 19 3 664 1647 161 40 96 walkway
5 1 1 1 19 4 842 1657 84 24 96 over
5 1 1 1 19 5 941 1651 60 31 93 the
5 1 1 1 19 6 1018 1653 173 32 92 Cooroora
5 1 1 1 19 7 1208 1656 100 30 96 creek
5 1 1 1 19 8 1328 1656 128 40 96 bridge.
5 1 1 1 19 9 1474 1659 109 31 96 There
5 1 1 1 19 10 1601 1661 26 30 96 is
5 1 1 1 19 11 1645 1668 43 24 97 no
5 1 1 1 19 12 1705 1661 159 40 96 footpath
5 1 1 1 19 13 1878 1665 129 39 96 joining
5 1 1 1 19 14 2024 1667 69 31 96 this
4 1 1 1 20 0 447 1692 1619 59 -1
5 1 1 1 20 1 447 1692 161 39 96 walkway
5 1 1 1 20 2 624 1701 84 24 96 over
5 1 1 1 20 3 723 1694 60 32 96 the
5 1 1 1 20 4 801 1696 118 39 95 bridge
5 1 1 1 20 5 936 1699 68 30 96 and
5 1 1 1 20 6 1022 1700 221 37 96 pedestrians
5 1 1 1 20 7 1261 1705 93 29 96 must
5 1 1 1 20 8 1369 1705 84 30 96 walk
5 1 1 1 20 9 1471 1713 43 23 96 on
5 1 1 1 20 10 1532 1706 60 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 20 11 1610 1708 93 30 96 road.
5 1 1 1 20 12 1723 1710 95 31 96 Once
5 1 1 1 20 13 1835 1713 155 38 96 crossing
5 1 1 1 20 14 2007 1714 59 30 96 the
4 1 1 1 21 0 447 1738 1642 57 -1
5 1 1 1 21 1 447 1738 130 39 96 bridge,
5 1 1 1 21 2 597 1741 219 37 96 pedestrians
5 1 1 1 21 3 834 1746 95 29 96 must
5 1 1 1 21 4 945 1745 111 32 96 either
5 1 1 1 21 5 1071 1747 84 31 96 walk
5 1 1 1 21 6 1174 1756 43 23 96 on
5 1 1 1 21 7 1234 1749 59 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 21 8 1311 1751 81 31 96 road
5 1 1 1 21 9 1411 1759 38 23 96 or
5 1 1 1 21 10 1465 1753 104 31 96 brave
5 1 1 1 21 11 1585 1754 60 32 96 the
5 1 1 1 21 12 1663 1763 136 24 96 uneven
5 1 1 1 21 13 1818 1759 132 36 96 ground
5 1 1 1 21 14 1968 1759 121 33 95 beside
4 1 1 1 22 0 445 1785 1635 57 -1
5 1 1 1 22 1 445 1785 60 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 22 2 523 1787 93 30 92 road.
5 1 1 1 22 3 637 1788 218 33 96 Pedestrians
5 1 1 1 22 4 873 1798 59 24 96 are
5 1 1 1 22 5 950 1792 120 37 94 placed
5 1 1 1 22 6 1089 1794 29 30 94 in
5 1 1 1 22 7 1136 1795 135 38 96 danger
5 1 1 1 22 8 1285 1796 85 32 96 from
5 1 1 1 22 9 1389 1799 109 31 96 traffic
5 1 1 1 22 10 1515 1802 184 38 96 especially
5 1 1 1 22 11 1715 1805 37 29 96 at
5 1 1 1 22 12 1770 1804 95 38 96 night
5 1 1 1 22 13 1881 1813 40 23 96 as
5 1 1 1 22 14 1937 1806 98 32 96 there
5 1 1 1 22 15 2053 1808 27 30 96 is
4 1 1 1 23 0 446 1832 1410 54 -1
5 1 1 1 23 1 446 1832 210 39 96 inadequate
5 1 1 1 23 2 673 1836 110 30 96 street
5 1 1 1 23 3 800 1836 140 40 96 lighting
5 1 1 1 23 4 959 1838 158 33 96 between
5 1 1 1 23 5 1136 1841 60 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 23 6 1213 1841 94 32 96 show
5 1 1 1 23 7 1325 1845 154 37 96 grounds
5 1 1 1 23 8 1495 1847 68 30 96 and
5 1 1 1 23 9 1582 1848 136 38 96 Factory
5 1 1 1 23 10 1735 1852 121 30 96 street.
4 1 1 1 24 0 444 1925 1626 55 -1
5 1 1 1 24 1 444 1925 29 31 96 If
5 1 1 1 24 2 487 1933 63 24 96 our
5 1 1 1 24 3 564 1928 136 31 96 visitors
5 1 1 1 24 4 716 1929 85 31 96 walk
5 1 1 1 24 5 819 1932 104 30 96 south
5 1 1 1 24 6 940 1940 44 23 96 on
5 1 1 1 24 7 1003 1934 142 31 96 Pavilion
5 1 1 1 24 8 1164 1937 110 30 96 street
5 1 1 1 24 9 1289 1937 99 32 96 there
5 1 1 1 24 10 1405 1939 26 30 96 is
5 1 1 1 24 11 1449 1947 18 23 96 a
5 1 1 1 24 12 1486 1947 100 31 96 grass
5 1 1 1 24 13 1602 1941 74 32 96 foot
5 1 1 1 24 14 1692 1944 81 36 96 path
5 1 1 1 24 15 1792 1952 44 23 96 on
5 1 1 1 24 16 1854 1945 59 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 24 17 1930 1949 140 29 96 eastern
4 1 1 1 25 0 443 1972 1589 57 -1
5 1 1 1 25 1 443 1972 74 32 96 side
5 1 1 1 25 2 534 1973 36 31 96 of
5 1 1 1 25 3 585 1974 58 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 25 4 660 1977 110 30 96 street
5 1 1 1 25 5 787 1977 107 31 96 which
5 1 1 1 25 6 914 1979 29 30 96 in
5 1 1 1 25 7 961 1982 68 28 96 wet
5 1 1 1 25 8 1045 1981 156 31 96 weather
5 1 1 1 25 9 1216 1984 26 29 96 is
5 1 1 1 25 10 1260 1983 146 40 96 slippery
5 1 1 1 25 11 1423 1987 103 38 96 going
5 1 1 1 25 12 1544 1987 99 32 96 down
5 1 1 1 25 13 1661 1989 59 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 25 14 1736 1993 104 36 96 steep
5 1 1 1 25 15 1857 1992 63 31 96 hill.
5 1 1 1 25 16 1939 1993 93 31 96 After
4 1 1 1 26 0 442 2020 1635 57 -1
5 1 1 1 26 1 442 2020 155 39 96 crossing
5 1 1 1 26 2 613 2028 84 24 96 over
5 1 1 1 26 3 714 2022 58 31 96 Mill
5 1 1 1 26 4 791 2025 122 37 96 street,
5 1 1 1 26 5 932 2025 99 32 96 there
5 1 1 1 26 6 1049 2028 26 30 96 is
5 1 1 1 26 7 1091 2035 20 23 96 a
5 1 1 1 26 8 1129 2028 119 33 96 choice
5 1 1 1 26 9 1265 2029 36 32 96 of
5 1 1 1 26 10 1314 2030 168 41 96 following
5 1 1 1 26 11 1501 2033 60 31 96 Mill
5 1 1 1 26 12 1578 2036 110 31 96 street
5 1 1 1 26 13 1704 2038 36 30 96 to
5 1 1 1 26 14 1758 2038 137 39 96 Factory
5 1 1 1 26 15 1912 2041 109 30 96 street
5 1 1 1 26 16 2037 2049 40 23 96 or
4 1 1 1 27 0 441 2066 737 41 -1
5 1 1 1 27 1 441 2066 144 40 96 walking
5 1 1 1 27 2 601 2068 147 39 93 through
5 1 1 1 27 3 766 2070 173 33 92 Cooroora
5 1 1 1 27 4 958 2073 108 32 96 Creek
5 1 1 1 27 5 1085 2075 93 31 96 Park.
4 1 1 1 28 0 441 2160 1581 55 -1
5 1 1 1 28 1 441 2160 58 31 96 Mill
5 1 1 1 28 2 517 2163 110 30 96 street
5 1 1 1 28 3 644 2163 118 39 96 bridge
5 1 1 1 28 4 781 2165 25 30 96 is
5 1 1 1 28 5 824 2166 145 31 96 wooden
5 1 1 1 28 6 988 2168 67 30 96 and
5 1 1 1 28 7 1073 2176 68 24 96 one
5 1 1 1 28 8 1158 2170 77 31 95 lane
5 1 1 1 28 9 1253 2172 75 31 96 with
5 1 1 1 28 10 1348 2181 42 23 96 no
5 1 1 1 28 11 1409 2174 160 40 96 walkway
5 1 1 1 28 12 1587 2184 40 23 95 so
5 1 1 1 28 13 1645 2178 220 37 96 pedestrians
5 1 1 1 28 14 1883 2181 88 31 96 have
5 1 1 1 28 15 1987 2184 35 29 96 to
4 1 1 1 29 0 439 2209 1559 61 -1
5 1 1 1 29 1 439 2210 163 36 96 compete
5 1 1 1 29 2 619 2209 77 31 96 with
5 1 1 1 29 3 713 2218 77 24 96 cars
5 1 1 1 29 4 807 2213 35 29 96 to
5 1 1 1 29 5 859 2220 109 24 96 cross.
5 1 1 1 29 6 989 2215 219 33 96 Pedestrians
5 1 1 1 29 7 1225 2218 81 31 96 then
5 1 1 1 29 8 1325 2219 88 32 96 have
5 1 1 1 29 9 1429 2223 36 28 97 to
5 1 1 1 29 10 1482 2223 151 31 96 contend
5 1 1 1 29 11 1651 2224 78 31 96 with
5 1 1 1 29 12 1746 2225 60 32 96 the
5 1 1 1 29 13 1824 2222 174 48 96 industrial
4 1 1 1 30 0 439 2256 1574 50 -1
5 1 1 1 30 1 439 2258 202 28 96 movement
5 1 1 1 30 2 659 2256 158 32 96 between
5 1 1 1 30 3 836 2258 59 32 96 the
5 1 1 1 30 4 913 2263 96 35 96 parts
5 1 1 1 30 5 1025 2261 37 31 96 of
5 1 1 1 30 6 1077 2263 88 38 93 Page
5 1 1 1 30 7 1183 2263 188 34 92 furnishers
5 1 1 1 30 8 1388 2274 42 23 95 on
5 1 1 1 30 9 1449 2268 112 31 96 either
5 1 1 1 30 10 1576 2270 75 31 96 side
5 1 1 1 30 11 1667 2271 36 30 96 of
5 1 1 1 30 12 1717 2272 60 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 30 13 1795 2273 82 31 96 road
5 1 1 1 30 14 1896 2274 117 32 96 before
4 1 1 1 31 0 437 2300 1535 63 -1
5 1 1 1 31 1 437 2300 83 39 96 they
5 1 1 1 31 2 536 2309 64 24 96 can
5 1 1 1 31 3 619 2303 101 31 95 reach
5 1 1 1 31 4 738 2303 59 32 96 the
5 1 1 1 31 5 814 2305 159 39 96 footpath
5 1 1 1 31 6 991 2315 44 23 96 on
5 1 1 1 31 7 1054 2309 137 39 96 Factory
5 1 1 1 31 8 1208 2313 120 30 93 street.
5 1 1 1 31 9 1347 2314 172 32 91 Cooroora
5 1 1 1 31 10 1537 2316 109 32 96 Creek
5 1 1 1 31 11 1664 2318 81 37 96 park
5 1 1 1 31 12 1764 2319 64 31 95 has
5 1 1 1 31 13 1844 2328 19 23 95 a
5 1 1 1 31 14 1881 2317 91 46 96 good
4 1 1 1 32 0 437 2347 1322 56 -1
5 1 1 1 32 1 437 2347 161 40 96 walkway
5 1 1 1 32 2 614 2350 147 39 95 through
5 1 1 1 32 3 780 2354 36 29 96 to
5 1 1 1 32 4 835 2353 55 30 96 Hill
5 1 1 1 32 5 908 2356 111 30 96 street
5 1 1 1 32 6 1035 2355 106 32 96 which
5 1 1 1 32 7 1161 2358 27 30 96 is
5 1 1 1 32 8 1205 2360 124 36 96 scenic,
5 1 1 1 32 9 1348 2361 95 37 96 quiet
5 1 1 1 32 10 1459 2362 68 31 96 and
5 1 1 1 32 11 1545 2363 214 40 96 interesting.
4 1 1 1 33 0 437 2441 1538 55 -1
5 1 1 1 33 1 437 2441 95 31 96 None
5 1 1 1 33 2 549 2442 38 30 96 of
5 1 1 1 33 3 600 2443 58 31 96 the
5 1 1 1 33 4 676 2446 118 30 96 routes
5 1 1 1 33 5 812 2448 201 30 96 mentioned
5 1 1 1 33 6 1032 2448 64 32 96 has
5 1 1 1 33 7 1112 2450 177 39 96 adequate
5 1 1 1 33 8 1307 2452 138 40 96 lighting
5 1 1 1 33 9 1463 2456 67 30 96 and
5 1 1 1 33 10 1548 2458 163 38 96 certainly
5 1 1 1 33 11 1728 2460 110 30 96 would
5 1 1 1 33 12 1857 2463 60 29 96 not
5 1 1 1 33 13 1933 2462 42 31 96 be
4 1 1 1 34 0 435 2488 1286 51 -1
5 1 1 1 34 1 435 2488 204 33 96 considered
5 1 1 1 34 2 657 2490 77 32 96 safe
5 1 1 1 34 3 750 2493 37 30 96 at
5 1 1 1 34 4 804 2492 105 39 96 night.
5 1 1 1 34 5 930 2495 56 30 96 We
5 1 1 1 34 6 1004 2503 83 31 96 urge
5 1 1 1 34 7 1104 2498 129 31 96 council
5 1 1 1 34 8 1251 2501 35 29 97 to
5 1 1 1 34 9 1304 2501 141 38 96 remedy
5 1 1 1 34 10 1463 2502 67 31 96 this
5 1 1 1 34 11 1547 2504 174 32 95 situation.
4 1 1 1 35 0 435 2582 241 39 -1
5 1 1 1 35 1 435 2582 80 31 96 Kind
5 1 1 1 35 2 534 2584 142 37 96 regards
4 1 1 1 36 0 609 2815 647 45 -1
5 1 1 1 36 1 609 2815 4 4 75 .
5 1 1 1 36 2 718 2817 114 31 93 Noosa
5 1 1 1 36 3 849 2819 78 30 90 A.H.
5 1 1 1 36 4 946 2819 27 31 93 &
5 1 1 1 36 5 989 2820 24 30 96 I.
5 1 1 1 36 6 1032 2820 139 40 96 Society
5 1 1 1 36 7 1189 2823 67 31 96 Inc.
4 1 1 1 37 0 1954 3315 289 44 -1
5 1 1 1 37 1 1954 3315 105 44 96 Page
5 1 1 1 37 2 2074 3315 49 35 96 32
5 1 1 1 37 3 2138 3315 43 35 96 of
5 1 1 1 37 4 2194 3315 49 34 96 42Section 33
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 33 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRI
L 2018
Submission No. 4
LY” recthres a
Mr Brett de Chastel lof 16 APR 201
Chief Executive Officer N 8 Is
Noosa Council \3 = Couneij
P.O. Box 141 QS &Cords é/
Tewantin re
QLD 4565 Ce]
Re: Your Say Noosa — Proposed amendments to the Noosa Plan
and commercial building design guidelines for Pomona
Dear Mr de Chastel
In making this submission through the Your Say process in respect of the Noosa Plan Review, I remind
Council of advice provided by a consultant in November 2005, which said that [QUOTE]:
“New commercial development has the potential to degrade the current character of the
Pomona Town Centre. It is considered that existing controls in the Noosa Planning Scheme do
not offer sufficient guidance for new commercial development in Pomona.”
Council may have changed its planning scheme to take account of this finding during the intervening
13 years. In case it hasn’t I attach the relevant pages of the report that Noosa Council adopted on
24 November 2005.
Yours sincerely
12 April 2018
Page 33 of 42Section 34
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 34 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
4 Submission No. 4 (continued)
t
= C¢ f
ext ¢ ack SW. Own S
Mo igncina lou Contre Peecemele \ lan /
adopled 24 Novemlass 2008.
Commercial Building Design Guidelines 8.0
8.1 Commercial Building Design Guidelines 8.2 Implementation Plan
There is considerable area of land in Pomona in the commercial zone that Implementation of the Commercial Building Design Guidelines involves
is either undeveloped or underdeveloped. New commercial development the following steps:
has the potential to degrade the current character of the town centre. 1. Council support this part of the plan and appoint responsible project
Community consultation clearly indicated the desire for new commercial officer.
buildings to contribute and reinforce the town centre character, In addition 2.
it is considered that existing controls in the Noosa Planning Scheme do not
offer sufficient guidance for new commercial development in Pomona.
This part of the Precinct Plan references Commercial Building Design 3)
Guidelines to guide the design and layout of new commercial buildings in
Pomona.
These guidelines are attached to this precinct plan on the following pages. 4. Proceed with advertising and implementing amendments in
accordance with Integrated Planning Act.
Page 34 of 42Section 35
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 35 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission No. 4 (continued)
Bt epee
i NOOSA
a ’ f
‘he | N Saeed | S13
a Le Pg ee
—=— Bal isa | 4
ae ie » wa >. Be a
ei é is — ¥ | ml
ae a = a.
. . . . ° .
Commercial Building Design Guidelines
for Pomona Town Centre
Intent
Pomona Town Centre has a concentration of the shire’s remaining built cultural heritage.
Other locations in Noosa have lost their built cultural heritage due to development. Pomona’s
older buildings are a major contributor to what makes the place special. At the same time
Pomona is a place for people to live in a contemporary way — there is no need for new
buildings to mimic older buildings, but rather respect and re-inforce the built cultural heritage
through good site responsive architecture.
These Building Design Guidelines
provide guidance on _ site
ae ; :
| | fe Pore responsive architecture _—for
| } commercial development in
( } | Pomona’s Town Centre. They are
i} = | |
oT] Be |
SI 8 |
= Y
— \
|
= 6 |
=| | |
\
a —_———e—. Pion” ve PTY BON Dae
TT) | serene +
rT e =alm a iG) Siting and Layout
Bh PF \ba 1 |
.. ptea\S e New buildings right on the
BULDINGS off FRAT ProveRTy BOUNDARY Set Ee
KEQBSIE PARKING AT ARNT e No _ internal air-conditioned
WIDE AWHINGS OER Foor PATH —oe
Page 35 of 42Section 36
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 36 of 42
Zp 40 9¢ abe
*(J910F] BUOWOg
el itil ay axl) «syoor payoyid
Ajdaays SulepouwosoR
a Ji Saujout g uy) o10UW 2q 0}
| * poou Aew jYySi9}4{ Suipjing
nt =| MOIA
5 1 1 1 7 4 2006 776 95 37 0 O1]qnd
4 1 1 1 8 0 670 820 1432 57 -1
5 1 1 1 8 1 670 820 34 57 42 ra
5 1 1 1 8 2 742 821 8 40 38 f
5 1 1 1 8 3 1506 860 13 2 23 Ge
5 1 1 1 8 4 1610 818 12 48 59 |)
5 1 1 1 8 5 1651 831 55 28 11 pure
5 1 1 1 8 6 1751 823 128 37 0 «oasejuoy
5 1 1 1 8 7 1927 830 83 24 0 §=joons
5 1 1 1 8 8 2056 830 46 29 32 oy)
4 1 1 1 9 0 672 845 1430 70 -1
5 1 1 1 9 1 672 866 45 49 37 Bog
5 1 1 1 9 2 1472 845 130 61 50 am
5 1 1 1 9 3 1652 878 71 28 17 wos
5 1 1 1 9 4 1751 877 72 29 67 yorq
5 1 1 1 9 5 1848 877 42 23 66 19S
5 1 1 1 9 6 1917 877 64 28 53 [JOM
5 1 1 1 9 7 2009 869 93 31 0 AdJ0}S
4 1 1 1 10 0 676 911 1426 47 -1
5 1 1 1 10 1 676 911 24 47 47 ‘a
5 1 1 1 10 2 1444 920 50 37 34 ae
5 1 1 1 10 3 1651 923 107 28 27 puosas
5 1 1 1 10 4 1777 923 46 28 90 oy}
5 1 1 1 10 5 1842 923 72 28 41 savy
5 1 1 1 10 6 1933 922 29 24 69 0}
5 1 1 1 10 7 1982 922 33 29 84 9q
5 1 1 1 10 8 2037 914 65 28 17 Ae
4 1 1 1 11 0 670 945 1431 93 -1
5 1 1 1 11 1 670 945 38 93 8 b
5 1 1 1 11 2 1448 959 90 46 55 Sal
5 1 1 1 11 3 1651 969 165 29 0 aAneuaye
5 1 1 1 11 4 1853 969 45 27 22 uy
5 1 1 1 11 5 1971 960 130 37 0 ‘sireisdn
4 1 1 1 12 0 695 997 1407 46 -1
5 1 1 1 12 1 695 1008 9 11 34 a
5 1 1 1 12 2 733 997 44 41 31 A.
5 1 1 1 12 3 767 993 10 57 47 |
5 1 1 1 12 4 1652 1015 77 28 0 jIBJO1
5 1 1 1 12 5 1752 1015 45 27 72 ON
5 1 1 1 12 6 1841 1014 261 29 0 “UOIRpOUTODOR
4 1 1 1 13 0 662 1042 1438 53 -1
5 1 1 1 13 1 662 1048 22 47 38 ba
5 1 1 1 13 2 1470 1042 13 52 13 se
5 1 1 1 13 3 1651 1060 90 29 0 a04jO
5 1 1 1 13 4 1778 1060 32 20 80 JO
5 1 1 1 13 5 1849 1060 64 20 41 sasn
5 1 1 1 13 6 1953 1060 147 28 0 yreWpur|
4 1 1 1 14 0 697 1098 1469 37 -1
5 1 1 1 14 1 697 1118 20 5 17 si
5 1 1 1 14 2 1649 1106 43 29 62 Jo}
5 1 1 1 14 3 1744 1106 68 29 71 pesn
5 1 1 1 14 4 1864 1106 34 29 42 oq
5 1 1 1 14 5 1950 1098 150 37 11 <Ajqeiisoq
5 1 1 1 14 6 2152 1110 14 15 82 e
4 1 1 1 15 0 1273 1153 828 64 -1
5 1 1 1 15 1 1303 1171 87 44 47 ae
5 1 1 1 15 2 1454 1157 44 42 5 pai
5 1 1 1 15 3 1498 1153 58 64 0 iee.
5 1 1 1 15 4 1556 1172 44 29 15 Sy
5 1 1 1 15 5 1907 1165 115 24 0 “Qunjooy
5 1 1 1 15 6 2030 1165 71 29 36 yore
4 1 1 1 16 0 1387 1198 779 47 -1
5 1 1 1 16 1 1387 1224 19 17 31 A
5 1 1 1 16 2 1650 1198 164 47 0 @AOUNSIP
5 1 1 1 16 3 2005 1211 95 29 0 d1U09,
5 1 1 1 16 4 2151 1216 15 15 28 se
4 1 1 1 17 0 824 1247 212 42 -1
5 1 1 1 17 1 824 1247 23 32 0 *
5 1 1 1 17 2 882 1272 9 13 18 a
5 1 1 1 17 3 901 1258 21 31 21 A
5 1 1 1 17 4 941 1272 11 17 13 P|
5 1 1 1 17 5 976 1257 30 29 15 Niet
5 1 1 1 17 6 1030 1262 6 15 57 |
4 1 1 1 18 0 756 1274 1408 59 -1
5 1 1 1 18 1 756 1279 69 33 34 saan
5 1 1 1 18 2 874 1285 137 27 20 i
5 1 1 1 18 3 1197 1281 24 16 20 oe
5 1 1 1 18 4 1790 1274 165 59 18 Kd10}§
5 1 1 1 18 5 1978 1286 186 47 62 puodas
4 1 1 1 19 0 1425 1434 686 37 -1
5 1 1 1 19 1 1425 1447 123 24 26 evo
5 1 1 1 19 2 1567 1441 88 24 0 Hodey
5 1 1 1 19 3 1670 1434 115 37 54 (aman)
5 1 1 1 19 4 1801 1437 80 22 23 S004
5 1 1 1 19 5 1900 1438 54 22 20 ay
5 1 1 1 19 6 1976 1437 73 25 0 Sod
5 1 1 1 19 7 2055 1438 44 22 0 HiM
4 1 1 1 20 0 1302 1480 807 33 -1
5 1 1 1 20 1 1302 1498 15 15 91 e
5 1 1 1 20 2 1659 1482 135 27 0 Sitio
5 1 1 1 20 3 1809 1487 64 22 65 2BA°
5 1 1 1 20 4 1897 1484 122 24 29 SIHINMW
5 1 1 1 20 5 2037 1480 72 24 29 34iIM
4 1 1 1 21 0 1105 1532 1000 66 -1
5 1 1 1 21 1 1105 1551 141 47 26 ‘sosttuoid
5 1 1 1 21 2 2053 1532 52 65 33 ae
4 1 1 1 22 0 662 1598 1347 40 -1
5 1 1 1 22 1 662 1609 47 29 64 oy}
5 1 1 1 22 2 749 1609 60 29 24 OWL
5 1 1 1 22 3 851 1601 121 37 0 Yysnory)
5 1 1 1 22 4 1012 1609 48 20 35 ses
5 1 1 1 22 5 1102 1609 53 20 78 ued
5 1 1 1 22 6 1195 1601 58 28 4 Nod
5 1 1 1 22 7 1992 1598 17 17 0 .
4 1 1 1 23 0 662 1647 1380 72 -1
5 1 1 1 23 1 662 1655 59 28 68 yey)
5 1 1 1 23 2 736 1655 87 28 72 SIOOP
5 1 1 1 23 3 839 1655 56 29 63 puke
5 1 1 1 23 4 911 1655 141 29 90 SMOPUIM
5 1 1 1 23 5 1068 1647 78 37 0 sseid
5 1 1 1 23 6 1162 1647 89 36 0 osIeT
5 1 1 1 23 7 1302 1660 15 14 57 oe
5 1 1 1 23 8 1954 1649 88 70 30 aa
4 1 1 1 24 0 1113 1700 932 58 -1
5 1 1 1 24 1 1113 1713 135 45 1 ‘osejUuoLy
5 1 1 1 24 2 2037 1700 8 20 0 .
4 1 1 1 25 0 662 1755 1426 56 -1
5 1 1 1 25 1 662 1771 84 24 20 yoans
5 1 1 1 25 2 790 1771 47 28 63 ay
5 1 1 1 25 3 880 1771 70 20 9 JOAO
5 1 1 1 25 4 983 1757 152 54 35 SBUIUME
5 1 1 1 25 5 1157 1757 106 54 0 SpIA\
5 1 1 1 25 6 1301 1775 15 16 15 «
5 1 1 1 25 7 1741 1761 153 27 37 Satya
5 1 1 1 25 8 1896 1751 100 53 0 Gln
5 1 1 1 25 9 2001 1751 85 53 0 7uZy
4 1 1 1 26 0 1614 1879 386 53 -1
5 1 1 1 26 1 1614 1879 27 53 38 ae
5 1 1 1 26 2 1764 1893 60 4 62 —
5 1 1 1 26 3 1917 1889 83 25 51 ING
4 1 1 1 27 0 1003 1904 986 72 -1
5 1 1 1 27 1 1003 1916 145 48 0 eAeT
5 1 1 1 27 2 1165 1916 149 47 53 wong
5 1 1 1 27 3 1321 1899 58 86 92 |
5 1 1 1 27 4 1420 1899 248 86 29 lopli
5 1 1 1 27 5 1679 1932 165 12 48 yn
5 1 1 1 27 6 1967 1916 22 19 18 YY
4 1 1 1 28 0 1520 1969 565 44 -1
5 1 1 1 28 1 1520 1969 121 44 0 4p
5 1 1 1 28 2 1843 1976 136 28 10 ida
5 1 1 1 28 3 2000 1976 85 29 0 >on]
4 1 1 1 29 0 930 2000 383 61 -1
5 1 1 1 29 1 930 2014 18 47 91 /
5 1 1 1 29 2 965 2001 166 59 11 Ka10jS
5 1 1 1 29 3 1152 2000 161 61 30 [SUIS
4 1 1 1 30 0 815 2204 14 20 -1
5 1 1 1 30 1 815 2204 14 20 26 a
4 1 1 1 31 0 1023 2261 1074 144 -1
5 1 1 1 31 1 1023 2339 16 53 62 he
5 1 1 1 31 2 1061 2324 20 50 57 i
5 1 1 1 31 3 1196 2261 123 144 22 es
5 1 1 1 31 4 1339 2376 3 2 0 *
5 1 1 1 31 5 1989 2347 108 46 35 ‘soords
4 1 1 1 32 0 656 2393 1442 47 -1
5 1 1 1 32 1 656 2436 9 2 25 :
5 1 1 1 32 2 969 2393 24 47 15 rs
5 1 1 1 32 3 1110 2434 17 5 0 *
5 1 1 1 32 4 1482 2406 83 24 7 }90}S
5 1 1 1 32 5 1588 2406 37 20 91 UO
5 1 1 1 32 6 1648 2406 81 28 0 VSOY)
5 1 1 1 32 7 1750 2406 43 29 5 1OJ
5 1 1 1 32 8 1819 2406 132 29 30 popreme
5 1 1 1 32 9 1974 2405 35 29 92 oq
5 1 1 1 32 10 2033 2397 65 29 47 ABW
4 1 1 1 33 0 685 2439 1414 42 -1
5 1 1 1 33 1 685 2441 7 3 0 :
5 1 1 1 33 2 828 2465 24 5 44 a
5 1 1 1 33 3 1124 2439 118 42 30 Bima
5 1 1 1 33 4 1481 2451 89 30 0 wpoio
5 1 1 1 33 5 1584 2444 120 37 27 Surysed
5 1 1 1 33 6 1720 2452 48 19 86 seo
5 1 1 1 33 7 1784 2444 59 32 0 ysed
5 1 1 1 33 8 1861 2451 66 29 24 uoy)
5 1 1 1 33 9 1942 2443 157 37 54 Jodojaaop
4 1 1 1 34 0 689 2489 1409 41 -1
5 1 1 1 34 1 689 2522 4 8 0 ,
5 1 1 1 34 2 1171 2499 121 29 18 os
5 1 1 1 34 3 1365 2490 71 38 46 eee
5 1 1 1 34 4 1481 2498 46 28 45 Oy)
5 1 1 1 34 5 1560 2490 35 36 70 Aq
5 1 1 1 34 6 1628 2498 181 28 0 pajonysuod
5 1 1 1 34 7 1840 2498 34 28 85 aq
5 1 1 1 34 8 1907 2498 29 24 72 0}
5 1 1 1 34 9 1969 2489 129 37 40 posinbas
4 1 1 1 35 0 702 2534 1396 39 -1
5 1 1 1 35 1 702 2534 68 12 39 ine
5 1 1 1 35 2 968 2562 2 4 0 e
5 1 1 1 35 3 1116 2546 8 3 2 _
5 1 1 1 35 4 1219 2538 43 16 39 ae
5 1 1 1 35 5 1431 2564 2 2 1 B
5 1 1 1 35 6 1481 2544 22 29 6 SI
5 1 1 1 35 7 1520 2544 55 29 0 SI]
5 1 1 1 35 8 1589 2544 102 28 0 OYA
5 1 1 1 35 9 1722 2543 139 30 0 ‘episqioy
5 1 1 1 35 10 1877 2543 46 29 83 oy)
5 1 1 1 35 11 1938 2543 26 24 90 ye
5 1 1 1 35 12 1978 2535 120 37 44 Surysed
4 1 1 1 36 0 751 2562 1412 57 -1
5 1 1 1 36 1 751 2565 54 44 20 oe
5 1 1 1 36 2 873 2562 62 55 24 i
5 1 1 1 36 3 1205 2579 86 39 39 a
5 1 1 1 36 4 1369 2594 69 12 40 wee,
5 1 1 1 36 5 1481 2590 83 25 0 §6}OO.JS
5 1 1 1 36 6 1597 2590 36 20 95 UO
5 1 1 1 36 7 1659 2590 36 29 90 JO
5 1 1 1 36 8 1726 2582 147 37 34 UOISIAOId
5 1 1 1 36 9 1904 2590 11 28 90 /
5 1 1 1 36 10 1946 2589 150 29 0 UONUA}OY
5 1 1 1 36 11 2148 2594 15 15 13 @
4 1 1 1 37 0 684 2647 1477 80 -1
5 1 1 1 37 1 684 2723 2 3 45 if
5 1 1 1 37 2 920 2684 92 39 33 net
5 1 1 1 37 3 1169 2647 75 66 30 ane
5 1 1 1 37 4 1871 2647 290 69 0 suryiedieg
4 1 1 1 38 0 1094 3138 559 38 -1
5 1 1 1 38 1 1094 3138 217 38 14 (PeNUI}UOD)
5 1 1 1 38 2 1325 3144 21 29 73 F
5 1 1 1 38 3 1359 3143 65 31 82 ‘ON
5 1 1 1 38 4 1437 3143 216 32 13 UOrTssturqns
4 1 1 1 39 0 233 3318 1976 35 -1
5 1 1 1 39 1 233 3318 99 34 57 8102
5 1 1 1 39 2 347 3319 135 34 4 1lddV
5 1 1 1 39 3 498 3318 48 34 94 92
5 1 1 1 39 4 1579 3318 197 35 4 VONADSV
5 1 1 1 39 5 1793 3318 203 35 40 SONILAAW
5 1 1 1 39 6 2013 3318 196 35 29 IWIDSdSSection 37
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 37 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission No. 4 (continued)
tnt | a ¥
| AR i| | Ht WIN i) LR yN rN
WAU MLEULACU LGU 1: rr on 7
feREte, tle parE .
nnn Se eae
ff TJ
E SS =
ICONIC Te SWREY” COMMERCIAL FRONTIERTURE- s
| =
a. | tS SS —= \
= fe Tt
—_ yt Le
MOPE NCC TWe SREY ANH TECREM
wt _—_——— |
Decoration, Detailing and Textures
+ Signage integrated with the awning and. or
parapet.
e Attention to detail in decoration, detailing and
textures of facades. Engagement of local
craftspeople and artisans encouraged. ee Ee een
/ ) Oe HEE
\ Jo We Post. Hr BLES
sa fH rm YA] IM
eaki 4 Thy | a | \\ j
| rad | debts} [ i .
fs
SIONMLE HITECEATED «WI Awines / Preneels | —, et BULDNGS
Cty 5 COnUG
PWG
CA )) IN () \
DECORATING TEXTURES AD
Page 37 of 42Section 38
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 38 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission No. 4 (continued)
Public Spaces and |, commit 07 nag heel
Facilities Ys
5 1 1 1 4 3 1249 861 121 20 18 eee
5 1 1 1 4 4 1414 871 2 3 16 tae
5 1 1 1 4 5 1608 864 4 2 0 ae
4 1 1 1 5 0 325 938 1474 82 -1
5 1 1 1 5 1 325 961 15 16 91 e
5 1 1 1 5 2 390 953 93 36 96 Space
5 1 1 1 5 3 515 952 130 37 96 adjacent
5 1 1 1 5 4 677 957 30 24 96 to
5 1 1 1 5 5 739 952 46 29 96 the
5 1 1 1 5 6 817 956 79 33 95 entry
5 1 1 1 5 7 929 951 36 29 95 of
5 1 1 1 5 8 992 952 47 29 96 the
5 1 1 1 5 9 1138 945 18 54 12 4
5 1 1 1 5 10 1491 938 35 34 17 BS
5 1 1 1 5 11 1724 967 13 10 32 a
5 1 1 1 5 12 1764 966 35 54 61 |
4 1 1 1 6 0 390 998 765 42 -1
5 1 1 1 6 1 390 998 139 37 96 premises
5 1 1 1 6 2 548 998 44 29 96 for
5 1 1 1 6 3 609 998 103 37 96 people
5 1 1 1 6 4 730 1003 29 24 96 to
5 1 1 1 6 5 775 998 100 37 96 gather
5 1 1 1 6 6 891 998 55 29 95 and
5 1 1 1 6 7 964 1002 75 25 95 meet
5 1 1 1 6 8 1139 1009 16 31 12 5
4 1 1 1 7 0 391 1043 1364 48 -1
5 1 1 1 7 1 391 1043 59 30 97 free
5 1 1 1 7 2 461 1043 37 30 96 of
5 1 1 1 7 3 504 1043 185 30 95 commercial
5 1 1 1 7 4 704 1043 146 29 96 intrusion.
5 1 1 1 7 5 1096 1054 1 4 66 |
5 1 1 1 7 6 1121 1039 27 51 0 &
5 1 1 1 7 7 1597 1044 29 30 23 hte
5 1 1 1 7 8 1655 1050 100 41 29 ee
4 1 1 1 8 0 1372 1080 422 38 -1
5 1 1 1 8 1 1372 1090 1 4 0 ‘
5 1 1 1 8 2 1501 1090 2 3 0 }
5 1 1 1 8 3 1516 1080 20 38 58 we
5 1 1 1 8 4 1752 1099 42 11 0 '_=-
4 1 1 1 9 0 325 1094 1168 57 -1
5 1 1 1 9 1 325 1124 15 15 72 e
5 1 1 1 9 2 389 1114 187 37 95 Community
5 1 1 1 9 3 599 1114 134 29 96 facilities
5 1 1 1 9 4 753 1114 35 29 96 be
5 1 1 1 9 5 809 1114 139 37 96 provided
5 1 1 1 9 6 968 1114 70 29 96 such
5 1 1 1 9 7 1466 1094 27 22 28 2
4 1 1 1 10 0 389 1158 906 41 -1
5 1 1 1 10 1 389 1168 32 21 96 as
5 1 1 1 10 2 442 1159 95 30 96 notice
5 1 1 1 10 3 559 1159 112 34 96 boards,
5 1 1 1 10 4 693 1159 96 38 96 public
5 1 1 1 10 5 810 1159 105 34 96 toilets,
5 1 1 1 10 6 937 1168 102 29 97 spaces
5 1 1 1 10 7 1168 1154 26 50 6 ee
5 1 1 1 10 8 1239 1158 38 41 43 al
4 1 1 1 11 0 391 1168 1391 83 -1
5 1 1 1 11 1 391 1205 44 30 97 for
5 1 1 1 11 2 446 1206 63 29 96 stall
5 1 1 1 11 3 523 1205 123 30 96 holders.
5 1 1 1 11 4 1184 1168 61 83 37 a
5 1 1 1 11 5 1607 1224 3 2 30 -
5 1 1 1 11 6 1698 1218 46 27 39 oma
4 1 1 1 12 0 325 1253 1269 62 -1
5 1 1 1 12 1 325 1287 11 12 30 ¢
5 1 1 1 12 2 391 1273 140 38 88 Friendly,
5 1 1 1 12 3 544 1282 75 29 96 open
5 1 1 1 12 4 634 1273 114 29 96 facades
5 1 1 1 12 5 761 1278 29 24 97 to
5 1 1 1 12 6 802 1273 97 38 96 public
5 1 1 1 12 7 912 1282 101 29 96 spaces
5 1 1 1 12 8 1343 1253 63 62 16 oe
5 1 1 1 12 9 1571 1258 23 5 12 i
4 1 1 1 13 0 699 1396 756 70 -1
5 1 1 1 13 1 699 1396 84 70 24 eS,
5 1 1 1 13 2 1109 1402 346 61 91 Streetscaping
4 1 1 1 14 0 621 1442 1203 133 -1
5 1 1 1 14 1 621 1442 50 99 33 yr
5 1 1 1 14 2 788 1443 146 132 0 “
5 1 1 1 14 3 1107 1505 15 15 84 e
5 1 1 1 14 4 1172 1495 86 30 87 Level
5 1 1 1 14 5 1272 1504 33 21 96 or
5 1 1 1 14 6 1316 1495 98 38 96 gently
5 1 1 1 14 7 1428 1495 102 38 96 sloped
5 1 1 1 14 8 1543 1495 106 38 96 graded
5 1 1 1 14 9 1663 1503 80 21 96 areas
5 1 1 1 14 10 1756 1495 68 29 96 with
4 1 1 1 15 0 540 1540 1284 48 -1
5 1 1 1 15 1 540 1541 16 36 25 /
5 1 1 1 15 2 933 1577 4 11 0
hard durable paving / surfaces. Avoid
{ | steps or changes in levels except at the
\ } kerb.
“~ ia e Open uncluttered streetscapes, level
cr) y = 7 access to shops, clear stemmed shade
( i To | Pe} trees, no fussy garden beds.
} ( oo
‘Sm \ | fA\\. e Comfortable street furniture.
us LH. +O
SIMP“LE (EVEL UWLTERED siereTscare.s
WM COMRGIABLE STORET FURNITURE Aap Character
AE PRE AOE Tes e Retain character of shops and buildings,
but ensure they remain viable a
e Retain existing character residential
buildings on Memorial Avenue between
the ANZ Bank and the Post Office if
: they are redeveloped for commercial
y Ne eat ee purposes. New commercial uses in these
1 en} ea buildings should re-use and refurbish the
+” ~ & rs eo current buildings so as to retain their
= at character.
ee ‘5
ma) ee
—ee ees,
a mi oot Dll ,
a a, q
Page 38 of 42Section 39
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 39 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission No. 4 (continued)
&
KA
} / VY [tower
; | } | Ther oF
i jp NPR
Ge) er
‘yor npsecat (2 ee ; CoM Mushy
an wun “RK © ptiové Gc)
IN ON OO Bate A (cor
be Ks pa. L ~ W Tew —>
~ xi TS te j See e Max y
tetenw fe a SS. aa
. CE | } Lf Lb LoL <A\ \
B ©@7 pia)
aN | ABC PEGE rats Y Weg \
| Petterts Lie Net Retry
AAD. } ae \ \\\ 6ecuery
AS Bites. } — \ \ YY
a _— | vm
PoMosiA CHAD a> MWH aN oo
aa ONA ’ ARACT AL ‘ 1 Masel A
CHARPCAER. PEDPLE Ant pe
CHRPACTOR.. BUILDINGS cy
End of Commercial Building Design Guidelines
for Pomona Town Centre
Page 39 of 42Section 40
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 40 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission No. 4 (continued)
1
Division 5— General Provisions for the Heritage Overlay
13.11 Definitions
The following definitions are applicable to this code—
chenein om means an area or streetscape identified on the Heritage Overlay Maps
1.2 to OM9.2 and which may include within it heritage sites and character
buildings.
Character buildings means buildings within a character area that contribute positiveyto
the identified character of the area and may indude buildings that represent periods or
styles that predominate within the character area but have not been listed as a heritage
site. Figure 13 at the end of this code shows some examples of character buildings.
economic repair means the reasonable expenditure of monies to reinstate a building to
structural soundness.
heritage site means a site, building, item or place of historical cultural heritage
significance identified on Heritage Overlay Maps OM1.2 to OM 9.2 or Tables 3.1 — 3.9 of
Schedule 3 Heritage Sites. The term does not indude places listed on the Queensland
Heritage Register under the Queensiand Heritage Act”.
Character Statements for Character Areas
Maples Street Cooroy Character Area
The Maple Street Character Areais focused around the historic business centre of Cooroy and extends
from Morara St in the north to Crystal Street in the south and includes 9-73 Maple Street and 19
Crystal Street, as shown on Heritage Overlay MapOM3.2. The character area contains a number of
business, community and residentid buildings remaining from the early to mid twentieth century, which
influence the character of this area. Some of theseare listed as Heritage Sites within Schedule 3 of
the plonning scheme as follows—
-Former Cooroy Butter Factory (Art Gallery), c.1930-11 Maple Street
-Former Ferguson's Auctioneer's Office. c. 1910-21 Maple Street
-The Memorial Hall, c.1926 - 23-29 Maple Street
Conroy Post Office, c.1914- 33 Maple Street
-Methodist (Uniting) Churchand Church Hallc.1911-51 Maple Street
-Peachy's House, c.1929-68 Maple Street’.
The character area displays country town character elementsreminiscent of Coproy's history. Thearea
is chorocterised by traditional building design of a predominately low rise and low impact scale. typified
by lightweight construction. with a timber frame, generally raised above ground on stumps, many
featuring verandah elements. sunhoods and awnings to window and wall openings and simple roof designs,
either gobledor hipped. Typical materials usedinclude timber for cladding and corrugated iron for
roofs.
The business area is chorocterised by continuous shop fronts with buildings predominantly of single
storey, Many buildings have successfully maintained o human scale with flat cantilevered awnings over
the footpath creatingg intimate town atmosphere. Outdoor dining, verandas and glazed shopfronts
provide anactive interesting streetscape and places for people to meet.
oan Ses Eee ON RADE rraes ee eea area ar ee mene eeenny: On enn tEm: CE OD
Environmental a eee places.
” Refer to Schedule 3 Hetage for the complete list of hertage sites.
sadiens Coie By
Page 40 of 42Section 41
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 41 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission No. 4 (continued)
Further along Maple Street, south of the business area building formsare domestic in scale and form
and are consistent with the Queensland vernacular traditions. Landscaped setbacks and front yards
without front fences and low impact domestic scale buildings, contribute to the open character of this
port of the character area.
Tewantin Road Cooroy Character Arca
aoe een maior nen er eeecieny Seger eae ee Tewantin Road at
the eastern approach to Cooroy township and includes 26 to 52 Tewantin Road, as shown on Heritage
Overlay Mop OM3.2. The character area is characterised by relatively largeallotments with
Queensland vernacular style timber and iron houses on stumps, many featuring verandah elements,
sunheeds to windows and wall openings and simple roof designs, either gabledor hipped. The Anglican
Church of the Holy Nativity is locatedon 46 Tewantin Road.
Pomona Character Area
The Pomona Character Area is focusedon the central area of Pomona township, south westof the
railway line and includes business, residential and community premises within parts of Reserve Street,
Memorial Avenue, Station Street, Rectory Street, Hospital Street Red Street and Signal Street, as
shown on Heritage Overlay Map OM5.2. Some of these premises ore listed as Heritage Sites within
Schedule 3 of the planning scheme as follows—
-Pomona Post Office, cl936 - 11 Memorial Ave
-Memorial School of Arts, c.1926-6 Reserve Street
~Ambulance Building, c.1917; 1971-17 Reserve Street
-Former Pomona State School (Pomona & District Kindergarten and Childcare Centre). c.1907
~ Stan Topper Pork, 21 Reserve Street
-The Rotunda, cl1939-2 Bazzo Park, Reserve Street
Pomona Hotel, c1901; 1913 - 1 Station Street
ssetchaiupuia aaecananacimaomeanaetemahamonaece eae eine maemnioeteee
Development is charocterised by traditional building design of low riseand low impact
scale, typified by light weight construction.with a timber frame, generally raised above ground on
stumps, many featuring verandah elements, sunhoods to windowsand wall openings and simple roof
designs, either gabled or hipped.
Business premises on Stetien Memorial Avenue Streetand the eastem side of Reserve Street have
continuous shopfronts making use of simple parapet walls for advertising. Some of the shops along
Stetion Steee+ Memorial Avenue hevedeage featuresreprasentativect+theare of the art deco style.
built after o fire in1939.
geome Tric n The S4 Oture UNG POrape tS, tari! died toa weit ane ren FEC Mason’
thet directly adjoin the street frontage, providing an active streetscape with outdoor dining
opportunities and a place for people tomeet. Premiseswith wide ownings over the street front,
integrated signage and glazed shopfronts lorge windows give an open and welcoming feel and add visual
interest and character to the streetscape.
Readily identifiable public buildings help to define the town's character, such as the School of Arts Hall,
The parts of the character area where residential uses predominate are characterised by Queensland
vernacular style housing on large residential lots withopen streetscapesand wide landscaped front
gordens. Houses ore predominately of timber cladding (weatherboord) and corrugatediron roofs.
= Ratertecomaeeid eaten ha rete Se ene is eran ae
aoe Overiay
Page 41 of 42Section 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Page 42 of 42
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 26 APRIL 2018
Submission No. 5
Extract from Your
5 1 1 1 3 4 667 595 63 41 96 Say
5 1 1 1 3 5 739 594 133 33 96 Noosa website portal
Guest Book
The amendment should include the allowance of synthetic turf to Nature strips as installed correctly will not cause trip hazard s and
will require very little maintenance. This product is used widely throughout many other councils with great success and we have
constant enquiries from clients wishing to install this high quality Australian made product. Many examples can be seen through out
Apr1718 the Sunshine Coast Council and surrounding areas of successful installations. Please contact me if you would wish to discuss
04:13:36 pm further.
Regards,
Page 42 of 42