Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Council archive · source document

Request for Change Application · 132007.1841.7

Attached to the e-mail SUPERSEDED Change to Development Approval - 100 Rene St, Noosaville - 132007.1841.7.

of 4

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                     -3-




(b) Results in the application applying to a new parcel of land – The proposed changes do not
    result in the application applying to a new parcel of land.

(c) Dramatically changes the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance – The proposed
    changes do not dramatically change the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance.
    Specifically:

             The proposed changes are limited to changing the building from 4 tenancies to a
            single tenancy;

            The site cover will remain consistent with the approved plans as well as the position
            of the building form within the site;

            The site will have generally consistent setbacks from the approval to the front, rear
            and side boundaries;

             The site will also present the same height and footprint as the approval; and

            The site will also provide an architectural form that is generally consist with the
            approval with some minor changes to accommodate the operational requirements
            of Reece.

(d) Changes the ability of the proposed development to operate as intended – The proposed
    changes do not change the ability of the proposal to operate as intended.

(e) Removes a component that is integral to the operation of the development – The proposed
    changes do not result in the removal of any component that is integral to the operation of
    the development.

(f) Significantly impacts on traffic flow and the transport network, such as increasing traffic to
    the site – The scale of the changes generally consists with the approval. Therefore the
    proposed on-site car parking provision is the same as the approved plans thus not creating
    any impacts on traffic flow and the transport network, such as increasing traffic to the site.

(g) Introduces new impacts or increase the severity of known impacts – The proposed changes
    do not introduce new impacts as the use of the proposal is consistent with the approved
    plans.

(h) Removes an incentive or offset component that would have balanced a negative impact of
    the development – The proposed changes do not remove any incentive or offset component.

(i) Impacts on infrastructure provisions– The proposal will not impact on infrastructure
    provision, location or demand with the scale of the proposal generally consistent with the
    approval.

    (ii) If a development application for the development, including the change, were made
    when the change application is made would not cause—

                                 \\TSSVR\Data\Synergy\Projects\170616\DA\Pre Lodgement\MOD - Request for Change Application- 3Jul17- BD.doc




        P 07 3361 9999 F 07 3361 9900 E [email protected] W www.tpalliance.com.au
                         Unit 4 / 13 Manilla Street, East Brisbane QLD 4169
                                 PO Box 5329 WEST END QLD 4101

Used in these records

About this file

File size
467 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Request for Change Application.pdf · 467 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.