Original source · versioned page text
Appendix I - Local Planning response
Column 1 Column 2 Assessment
Specific outcomes Probable solutions (if code assessment)
Retention, relocation & demolition S5.1 Character buildings and heritage sites within Not applicable
O5 The valued streetscape character within character areas are retained (see Figure 13.1 for some The proposal does not not involve development on a
character areas are protected through the retention of examples of character buildings)4; heritage place.
buildings that contribute positively to that character. OR
S5.2 Where a character building or heritage site cannot
be practicably retained on its existing premises, the
building or structure is relocated to an alternative
location within the Noosa Shire and reinstated to a
standard that is suitable for reuse, provided relocation
of the character building or heritage site will not result
in the loss of valued streetscape character5;
OR
S5.3 Demolition only occurs where the—
a) building or structure cannot be practicably
retained on the existing premises; and
b) the premises are physically constrained such that
the building or structure cannot be relocated to
an alternative location; or
c) the building or structure is structurally unsound
and not capable of economic repair6.
Adaptive reuse S6.1 No solution provided Not applicable
O6 Character buildings are conserved and protected The proposal does not not involve development on a
by adaptively reusing such sites, provided any new heritage place.
use—
a) does not impact on the cultural heritage
significance of the site;
b) respects the valued streetscape character;
c) is compatible with the amenity of adjacent uses;
and
d) provides for adequate buffer areas and buffer
elements between nearby uses.
Building works within character areas7
O7 Building works to premises within character S7.1 Building works on character buildings or heritage Not applicable
areas, are designed to be sympathetic to the valued sites are located to the rear of the building or to where The proposal does not not involve work in a character
4
Council may request a report prepared by a suitably qualified heritage consultant, in accordance with PSP1 Information Council May Request, demonstrating whether the building is a character building.
5
Council may request a report be prepared by a suitably qualified heritage consultant, in accordance with PSP1 Information Council May Request, demonstrating that the character area will not be adversely affected.
6
Council may request that an assessment be undertaken by a suitably qualified structural engineer, which demonstrates that the building or structure is structurally unsound and not capable of economic repair, as per PSP1- Information Council May Request.
7
Council may request a report prepared by a suitably qualified heritage consultant, in accordance with PSP1 Information Council May Request, demonstrating that the character area will not be adversely affected.
P a g e |3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original