Council archive · source document
Objection_Nov18 · MCU18/0015
Attached to the e-mail MCU180015 - Submission - Rebecca Stead.msg.
Objection Summary cont
7. ‘Of concern’ regional ecosystems
No acknowledgement or analysis is made of the site’s ‘Environment Enhance or
Protect status or ‘Of concern regional ecosystems’ for vegetation rehabilitation2 see
Bushfire report pg 14
8. Water usage
Water consumption for the 12 units is not addressed. This is an additional burden
arising from this site for resident usage (by at least 39.6 residents) and landscape
watering (rooftop, fern gardens). No provision for rainwater tanks for the 12 units is
addressed, only for the 2 dwellings. This does not seem to be in keeping with best
practice and drought awareness.
9. 61% vegetation removal
Vegetation removal is understated. Significantly, 61% of the total site vegetation IS
affected by the proposal for buildings, infrastructure and fire setbacks.
10. Landscape plans
a. Fern gardens are a recommended plant palate for units 1-12. However the
Ecological Assessment does not identify ferns as natural habitat in this vegitation
‘zone’. This indicates an inappropriate recommendation for site water usage and
plant survival and ‘authentic’ native habitat.
b. Vertical fern gardens are detailed as vertical ‘waterfalls’ between units 1-12. This is
in direct contradiction to the Bushfire Report, page 20 which states:
‘7.2 Asset Protection Zones and Landscaping Plant arrangement is just as important as low
combustibility. Plants should be placed so as to minimize either vertical or horizontal connectedness of
plant material’
11. Night light pollution is not addressed nor its impact on wildlife passing near or
through the wildlife corridor.
2 Refer Bushfire report pg 14Figure 9 shows the proposed development location in relation to vegetation
mapped by the Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy as “Of Concern” and “Of Least
Concern” Regional Ecosystems.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Objection_Nov18.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 276 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.