Original source · versioned page text
2015-01-15 Ordinary Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 15 JANUARY 2015
b. Best Practice Erosion and Sediment Control, International Erosion
Control Association (2008)
11. As a general rule, a site is determined to have achieved effective short-term
stabilisation if at the time of the request for “on maintenance”:
a. Methods of stabilisation are:
• appropriate for slopes and slope lengths; and
• are consistent with best practice environmental management
practices such as in the Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control
or the IECA Manual; and
• Stormwater runoff from the site is not currently, and is not likely to
result in visible evidence of sedimentation or erosion, or lead to
water contamination.
12. If at the time of request for “on maintenance”, the method of short-term
stabilisation has not achieved a level of stability that Council's Officers believe
will have a high probability of achieving long term stability, Council Officers may
take the following matters into consideration in determining whether the site is
capable of achieving medium to long-term stability:
a. Evidence that the site has been effectively stabilised in the short term;
b. Evidence that soil has been adequately ameliorated;
c. Evidence that seed of annual and perennial grass species has been
applied at an adequate rate; and
d. That grass seed has germinated at a density that is likely to achieve an
effective grass cover.
For example, while hydromulch can provide an immediate and effective
stabilising cover to soils, the protective cover can be relatively short-lived if
vegetation fails to establish before the thin layer of mulch decomposes. So if
hydromulch is selected as the method of temporary short term stabilisation,
Council Officers will seek to confirm that perennial as well as annual grasses
are well established to reduce the risk of instability of the site in the medium to
long term. As a general rule, hydromulch will only be accepted as a “patch” fix
and should comprise no more than 20% of the exposed site area due to the
high risk of failure. Due to the requirement to progressively stabilise exposed
areas, it is not envisioned that this will present any difficulties for an
appropriately managed and compliant site.
Property Notation
MCU14/0077 – Stormwater Treatment Device
The following notation applies to the subject lot:
This property is serviced by a bioretention basin water quality treatment device
that must be maintained in accordance with the document titled Maintaining
Vegetated Stormwater Assets, Version 1 (Water by Design, 2009). Records of
all maintenance activities undertaken on stormwater quality treatment devices
must be kept for a minimum of 5 years and made available to Council upon
request.
B. Find the following are sufficient grounds to justify the decision despite the conflict with
the Planning Scheme:
1. The proposal adds to the range of businesses and employment opportunities in
the Shire Business Centre
2. The trade related warehouse and showroom is more compatible with industrial
uses when compared to typical retail uses and is therefore suitably located as
proposed, being a transitional area between industrial and retail uses in the
Shire Business Centre.
Page 16 of 21
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.