Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

Second Report · 131999.982632.1

of 13

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

(7D

STAIR ENCLOSURE Concerns with waterproofing the stairwell were
highlighted during the discussion, with similar
previous situations noted as undesirable outcomes.

While I am confident that these concerns are not insurmountable through
good detailing, the proposal now incorporates a compromise position.

It was suggested that there were options available to either establish an
independent stair (probably circular) or to enclose the current stair
proposed - with relaxation of the provision of the Planning Schedule in
this regard.

In pursuing a solution, I have visited both options, but have concern
with the aesthetics of either an external circular stair (the only form
logically available) or a full enclosure of the current stair location -
while the latter is inboard in relation to the overall building, its height
above the current roof proposal results in a very unattractive form
which would be easily visible from the street.

Furthermore, a domestic circular stair (particularly a wet one) presents
a hazard to safety - especially to an older user - and I am reluctant to
employ one in this particular development.

My proposal puts forward a compromise. I have turned the stair to
enhance flow elsewhere within the building. I have also put forward an
option to enclose only the lower flight of the rooftop access with a roof
and glazed walls - surrounding the entire two flights with open external
louvres. This will ensure safe drainage of the topmost flight, with the
landing open on two sides and top flight open to one. The waterproofing
technique for the slab is no different for the flight than for the
trafficable rooftop.

The resultant form of this proposed solution is far less visually intrusive
to neighbours, addresses Council's concerns and is in keeping with the
tenor of the rest of the building.

In summary I contend that the arguments in the report are, to a degree, founded on
conjecture in order to protect Council's community responsibilities, and in light of
the compromise situation achieved and the revisions proposed, I seek to have the
condition denying the rooftop terrace revoked.

Yours Faithfully,

BRUCE RICHARDS
R.A.I.A.
MANAGING DIRECTOR

11 MITTI STREET / M & J WILSCHE

Used in these records

About this file

File size
3.9 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Second Report.pdf · 3.9 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.