Council archive · source document
Second Report · 131999.982632.1
(7D STAIR ENCLOSURE Concerns with waterproofing the stairwell were highlighted during the discussion, with similar previous situations noted as undesirable outcomes. While I am confident that these concerns are not insurmountable through good detailing, the proposal now incorporates a compromise position. It was suggested that there were options available to either establish an independent stair (probably circular) or to enclose the current stair proposed - with relaxation of the provision of the Planning Schedule in this regard. In pursuing a solution, I have visited both options, but have concern with the aesthetics of either an external circular stair (the only form logically available) or a full enclosure of the current stair location - while the latter is inboard in relation to the overall building, its height above the current roof proposal results in a very unattractive form which would be easily visible from the street. Furthermore, a domestic circular stair (particularly a wet one) presents a hazard to safety - especially to an older user - and I am reluctant to employ one in this particular development. My proposal puts forward a compromise. I have turned the stair to enhance flow elsewhere within the building. I have also put forward an option to enclose only the lower flight of the rooftop access with a roof and glazed walls - surrounding the entire two flights with open external louvres. This will ensure safe drainage of the topmost flight, with the landing open on two sides and top flight open to one. The waterproofing technique for the slab is no different for the flight than for the trafficable rooftop. The resultant form of this proposed solution is far less visually intrusive to neighbours, addresses Council's concerns and is in keeping with the tenor of the rest of the building. In summary I contend that the arguments in the report are, to a degree, founded on conjecture in order to protect Council's community responsibilities, and in light of the compromise situation achieved and the revisions proposed, I seek to have the condition denying the rooftop terrace revoked. Yours Faithfully, BRUCE RICHARDS R.A.I.A. MANAGING DIRECTOR 11 MITTI STREET / M & J WILSCHE
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Second Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.9 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.