Council archive · source document
ECM_22343537_v1_Coastal Hazard Assessment · 132000.200173.1
Very large file (20.4 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 26, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Internal use only
by BMT (2018) was at a beach compartment scale and did not provide site-specific estimation of erosion
vulnerability.
The following sections will review each component of the Erosion prone area based on site specific
conditions.
6.1.1 Long-term Erosion (N x R)
The long-term erosion component is based on the selected planning period (N) and the average annual
rate of long-term erosion (R).
In relation to the planning period, the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (2013) states,
“The long-term erosion component (excluding sea level rise) of the calculation is often cyclical in nature
and typically of a decadal scale. For this reason, it is considered the estimated annual rate of long-term
erosion is only applied for a 50-year period”. Where there is no clear evidence of long-term erosion
trends, the Department recommends a nominal provision of 10 metres.
The annual rate of long-term erosion (R) reflects changes to sediment supply to a beach and where there
is a long-term deficit in sediment supply this results in a longer-term recession of the shoreline. BMT
(2018) has calculated the long-term erosion rate for Sunshine Coast at beach profile line ETA 602. Table
3 provides a summary of BMT (2018) estimated long-term erosion for 2040, 2070 and 2100.
Table 3 Summary of Long-Term Recession Results from BMT (2018)
Annual Recession Long-Term Recession (m)
Beach Survey Profile
Rate (m/year) 2040 (N=23) 2070 (N=53) 2100 (N=3)
Sunshine Beach ETA 602.0 0.03 0.7 1.6 2.5
BMT (2018) calculated an annual long-term erosion rate of 0.03 metres/year for Sunshine Beach.
However, the subject site is located approximately 210m south of Noosa Headland which will influence the
sediment transport processes along this section of coast by trapping the long-term net northerly littoral
transport of sand (discussed in Section Error! Reference source not found.). This is supported by the
assessment of aerial and satellite imagery presented in Section 3 which has shown recovery and
progradation of the beach adjacent to the site since severe storm event related erosion in the early 1970’s.
Further, Section 3 highlights sensitivities associated with reporting intervals for long term recession and
the need to select suitable start and end dates for any analysis, which are not influenced by episodic
erosion events.
It is noted that BMT (2018) had adopted a nominal 10m value for long-term erosion for erosion prone area
calculation over a 100-year planning period and this is in accordance with the Department of Environment
and Heritage Protection (2013) methodology. This is consistent with the Department of Environment and
Heritage Protection (2013) methodology. However, it does not consider the effect of the site’s proximity to
Noosa Headland which will reduce long-term erosion.
Long-term erosion of 0 metres is considered more realistic given the influence of Noosa Headland which
would act in a similar fashion to a groyne by trapping sand moving north along the coast with the
prevailing south-easterly wave climate.
13 February 2023 2 ARAKOON CRESCENT, SUNSHINE BEACH PA3303 25
Document Set ID: 22343537
Version: 1, Version Date: 16/03/2023
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.