Original source · versioned page text
Request for Amended Advice Agency Response_Energex_Council CDA_01-04-2020
Attached to the e-mail Request for Energex to provide an Amended Advice Agency Response - 152006.1999.4.
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (12.4 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
J&P Richardson Industries Pty Ltd -9-
4.2.3 Geometry
The magnetic field calculations will be based on the intermediate pole top construction
shown in Appendix 2 for F790/F7298. A simplified ‘stick figure’ representation of the
structure geometries is reproduced in Figure 4 below for convenience.
Figure 4 F790 / 7298 Intermediate construction geometry ( IS(C)E
0.09m
2.00m
AФ CФ
1.90
BФ BФ
2.30m
1.90
m
CФ AФ
4.3 Magnetic and electric field calculations
4.3.1 Scenario1 average feeder load
The results of electric and magnetic field calculations relevant to scenario1 are summarised
in Table 7 below and Figure 6 and figure 7 overleaf.
Table 7 EMF levels scenario1 average 132kV feeder load
Calculated value at edge of
4mG offset
PARAMETER easement Maximum
Northern Southern Northern Southern
Magnetic Field strength 0.54mG 0.71mG N/A N/A 1.83mG
Electric Field strength 0.139kV/m 0.113kV/m ------ ------ 0.329kV/m
Hollett Road EMF Study V1.0
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.