Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Council archive · source document

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Petition

of 28

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (10.4 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

                                                                                                                                    ..
•
      Code Objective                     Developer's Assessment                   Objectors' Assessment

      road system                                                                 proposed access and egress point
                                                                                  does impact adversely on the safety
                                                                                  and operation of the Eumundi-Noosa
                                                                                  Road.

      014 Provision is made for          014 Complies                             Does not Comply
      pedestrian and vehicular           Can comply via condition                 The Applicants response is
      queues at conflict points;         where applicable.                        inconsistent and vague. The
                                                                                  Development will significantly affect
                                                                                  traffic on the Eumundi-Noosa Road,
                                                                                  the roundabout outside the School
                                                                                  and pedestrian children on the
                                                                                  footpath entrance in the event of
                                                                                  queuing to access the proposed
                                                                                  Development. The Applicant has
                                                                                  provided no objective analysis of the
                                                                                  likely queuing frequency or extent.
                                                                                  The Applicant's response is indicative
                                                                                  of the fact that the Applicant has not
                                                                                  conducted the required analysis and
                                                                                  expects the Assessment Manager to
                                                                                  determine what is appropriate, which
                                                                                  is unacceptable in the already
                                                                                  challenging circumstances.

     017 Car parking areas are          017 Complies                              Does not Comply
     landscaped ...                     Car parking areas have been               Cannot be compliant as they do not
                                        suitably landscaped.                      meet the requirements of the
                                                                                  Landscaping Code Objective 028.


    The Application    does not comply in the areas outlined         above and has completely                 failed to address
    adequately the potential       impacts on the adjoining School. At 6.2 of its Town Planning Report the
    Applicant makes unfounded,       unqualified   and unsupported     opinion as to the potential impacts on the
    adjoining School. The assessment is neither comprehensive nor soundly validated for example:


      Applicants Response / Assertion                      Objectors' Response

      l.   The proposed     petrol   store building   is   This is a statement of fact without justification                as to
           located more than 10m form the school           its relevance.
           boundary

                                                           10m is in effect too close to the School boundary to
                                                           ensure    the    safety    of the       children     attending    the
                                                           School. We have demonstrated                  elsewhere      in this
                                                           document        that    international     and Australian         best




                                                                                                                              23

Used in these records

About this file

File size
10.4 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object - Petition.pdf · 10.4 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.