Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

Engineering_Integrated Water Management Plan

of 34

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Plans and drawings

This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).

Log in to see the plans as drawn
3 Stormwater Quantity
The objective of this component of the study is to investigate the potential impact
that the proposed development will have on peak flows discharging downstream of
the site. Where any increases of peak flows are found, potential mitigation options
will be investigated in the form of a detention system.

Hydrologic modelling of the catchment has been carried out using WBNM software
developed jointly by the University of Wollongong, Rienco Consulting and Balance
R&D. The January 2007 version has been used for this investigation. A peak flow
rational method calibration has also been carried out.

Modelling has been carried out for the 2, 10 and 100 year ARI storm events. The
following scenarios have been investigated:

       1.      Existing Scenario
       2.      Developed Scenario
       3.      Mitigated Scenario

3.1    Existing Scenario
Sub-catchments delineated for the WBNM model have been based on detailed
survey and existing drainage details provided for the site. The existing scenario
WBNM sub-catchment layout is shown in Figure 7 of this report. The WBNM model
has been split into 5 sub-catchments with a total combined catchment area of 2.52
ha.

Sub-catchment fraction impervious values have been calculated based on aerial
imagery data. The existing scenario sub-catchment areas and fraction impervious
values for each sub-catchment are tabulated below in Table 13.

Table 13: WBNM Sub-Catchment Fraction Impervious Values – Existing Scenario

                                                               Existing Scenario
  WBNM Sub-Catchment                  Area (ha)
                                                                Impervious (%)
            SUBA                        1.24                           58
            SUBB                        0.76                          89
            SUBC                        0.34                          90
            SUBD                        0.07                          90
            SUBE                        0.12                          90
            TOTAL                       2.52                           -

The WBNM model has been calibrated to Rational Method derived peak flows at the
outlet of Catchments A and B which flow to drainage reserve to the west of the site
(WBNM catchment node ‘Outlet1’). Details of the Rational Method calibration are
provided in Section 3.2.



                                                                                      14
Log in to download the original file

Engineering_Integrated Water Management Plan.pdf · 6.9 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.