Original source · versioned page text
MCU16/0079 Appendix E - Traffic Impact Assessment
Tewantin Noosa RSL – Stage 4, 5 & 6
Traffic Impact Assessment
7. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
Key findings are summarised below:
Parking
the parking occupancy survey data indicates that there is currently spare car parking capacity both on
and off-street during busy trading periods for the RSL on typical trading days;
the curtesy bus patronage data indicates a high proportion of patrons arrive to the RSL on Friday and
Saturday via the curtesy buses (i.e. 12 to 14%);
estimated parking requirements for Stage 6 interpolated from the existing parking supply rate (i.e. 4.39
spaces/100m² TUA) would warrant a total of 128 off-street car parking spaces, which equates to a
shortfall of five (5) spaces compared to what is proposed (i.e. 123 spaces);
estimated parking requirements for Stage 6 interpolated from the surveyed peak parking demand rate
(i.e. 4.09 spaces/100m² TUA) would warrant a total of 119 off-street car parking spaces, which equates
to a surplus of four (4) spaces compared to what is proposed (i.e. 119 spaces); and
we are of the view that the proposed parking provision for Stage 6 should be adequate to
accommodate likely peak parking demands generated by the proposed expansion. On the few days of
the year where parking demands may exceed supply (i.e. Anzac Day, New Year’s Eve etc.), we are of
the view that there are sufficient on-street parking opportunities to cater for this temporary spike in
demand. Importantly, the proposed development results in no net loss of on-street parking.
Access
the configuration of the proposed new driveway crossovers will comply with Council standards;
the combination of introducing new crossovers and removing existing crossovers results in no net loss
in on-street parking along the frontage of the subject site;
it is acknowledged that the proposed new crossovers do not achieve minimum sight distances required
for access driveways in accordance with Australian Standards. That said, we are of the view that the
proposed arrangement is acceptable as it is consistent with the existing situation and given the town
centre context (i.e. low speed environment etc.).
Servicing
due to landscape offset requirements along the Pelican Street frontage of the site, it will not be
possible to provide HRV access to the deck carpark and loading area. As such, it is recommended that
service vehicle access is restricted to RCV’s, MRV’s, SRV’s and Vans;
it is acknowledged that the service vehicle restriction will impact liquor and coke deliveries, which
currently occur via HRV’s. However, the RSL has spoken with the relevant suppliers to confirm that
servicing can occur via MRV’s;
a detailed swept path assessment has confirmed that Council’s standard RCV could adequate access
the proposed deck car park and manoeuvre into the proposed loading bay. That said, the service
vehicles accommodate the full width of the service aisle when access the loading dock and as such, it
is recommended that the deck car park is restricted to staff parking only;
Carpark Layout
the only non-compliant element of the proposed new car parking areas is the servicing aisle width on
the deck car park. However, a detailed swept path assessment has confirmed that the proposed
arrangement could adequately accommodate waste truck manoeuvring and deliveries via MRV’s.
External Impacts
the proposed expansion will have negligible operational impacts on the surrounding road network;
Alternative Transport
the site is located within a town centre environment and as such, patrons and staff benefit from access
to high quality active and public transport provisions. No modifications to the existing active and public
transport networks and infrastructure is warranted to accommodate the proposed expansion.
Based on the findings of this report, we are of the opinion that there are no traffic engineering related
matters to preclude approval of this development application.
Project No: P2623 Version: 002 Page 13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original (MCU16_0079 Appendix E - Traffic Impact Assessment.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.