2017-01-19 Ordinary Meeting Agenda

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                      19 JANUARY 2017


    2.   The proposal is not conveniently located or readily accessible for the local community
         and will not provide a significant benefit to that community.
    3.   The development will adversely impact on the local villages and towns by reducing
         patronage to these centres and therefore will not improve community wellbeing.
    4.   The proposal is contrary to the SEQ Regional Plan’s Regional Policy 11.5.1 to identify
         and protect existing and potential drinking water catchments from inappropriate land
         use as the development would pose an unacceptable risk to water quality.
    5.   The proposal is contrary to the Environmental Protection (Water) Policy for Mary River
         Environmental Values and Water Quality Objectives as the proposed surface water
         quality exceeds these objectives in relation to Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorous
         and the applicant has not addressed the impact the in-ground storage of fuel will have
         on ground water.
    6.   The proposal fails to meet the Plan of Development for the site, including the provision
         of a 10 metre landscape buffer to visually screen the development from the Bruce
         Highway.
    7.   The proposed illumination of the advertising devices is contrary to the Advertising
         Devices Code and the intent of the Plan of Development for the site.
    A.   Approve the application in accordance with the following conditions:
         PLANNING
               When Conditions must be Complied With
         1.    Unless otherwise stated, all conditions of this Decision Notice must be complied
               with prior to the use commencing, and then compliance maintained at all times
               while the use continues.
               Approved Plans
         2.    Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply
               with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the
               following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions.

               Plan No.   Rev.   Plan/Document Name                                 Date

               DA-02      P5     Site Plan, prepared by Red Dog Architects          19/10/2016

               DA-05      P5     North Elevation, prepared by Red Dog Architects    19/10/2016

               DA-06      P5     South Elevation, prepared by Red Dog Architects    19/10/2016

               DA-07      P5     East & West Elevations, prepared by Red Dog        19/10/2016
                                 Architects

         3.    The Approved Plans must be amended to incorporate the amendments listed
               within this Decision Notice and resubmitted to Council prior to the issue of
               Development Permit for Operational Works for any civil works.
               Built form
         4.    The building design must be amended to include architectural design features
               that reflect the hinterland/village character of the locality. Design outcomes such
               as traditional roof form, timber framed windows, eaves and the like must be
               included.




                                                                                    Page 5 of 25