Original source · versioned page text
2020-06-18 Ordinary Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 18 JUNE 2020 GENERAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 15 JUNE 2020 - Crs Frank Wilkie (Chair), Karen Finzel, Joe Jurisevic, Amelia Lorentson, Clare Stewart, Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener 2 MCU18/0015 & RAL18/0001- PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL NO 219 OF 2020 - REFUSAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR 2 DETACHED HOUSES & 12 MULTIPLE HOUSING UNITS AND RECONFIGURING A LOT (1 INTO 4 LOTS PLUS EASEMENT) AT 27 ATTUNGA HEIGHTS, NOOSA HEADS Moved: Cr Stockwell Seconded: Cr Wilkie That Council note the report by the Manager Development Assessment to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 9 June 2020 regarding Planning & Environment Court Appeal No. 1219 of 2020 and agree to defend the appeal. Carried Unanimously. 5 ENVIRONMENT PROJECT GRANTS Cr Stockwell declared a perceived conflict of interest in this matter (as defined in section 175D of the Local Government Act 2009) related to the application by Hinterland Bush Links Inc. (in partnership with Noosa and District Landcare), due to the fact as a Sole Trader in his business Watershed Australia, he has both been contracted by, and had subcontracted officers of, Noosa and District Landcare prior to becoming a Councillor. He is also an ordinary member of the group with long standing association including as a Council representative that assisted in its foundation in 1989. Cr Stockwell advised of his collegial relationships dating back to the 1980s with members of Landcare, his professional roles as a State Government public servant liaising with Landcare through those roles and his relationship with members of the current Landcare Committee. Cr Stockwell further advised that prior to him becoming a Councillor, he undertook a paid 2 day consultancy facilitating a meeting of Landcare members in 2015 and he had also subcontracted Landcare for a project. Cr Stockwell advised that there was no nexus between the work he had undertaken for Landcare prior to him becoming a Councillor and the project before Council for consideration. Cr Stockwell believed that he could consider this item impartially and in the public interest and requested to remain in the meeting room to participate in the debate and vote on this matter. Pursuant to section 175E(4) of the Local Government Act 2009, the remaining Councillors gave consideration to whether the conflict was a real conflict or perceived conflict and whether Cr Stockwell may participate in the meeting for the debate and vote on this matter or whether he must leave the meeting for the debate and vote on this matter. Council Resolution Moved: Cr Wilkie Seconded: Cr Jurisevic That Councillors note the perceived conflict of interest declaration of Cr Stockwell and resolve that this represents a perceived conflict of interest in this matter and Cr Stockwell may remain in the meeting room to participate in the debate and vote on this matter. For: Crs Wilkie, Wegener, Jurisevic, Finzel and Lorentson Against: Cr Stewart Carried. Cr Stockwell did not vote on the above motion. Page 9 of 26
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.