Council archive · source document
Refused Decision Notice MCU24 0032 · MCU24/0032
Officer: Samuel Osakwe
Direct Telephone: 07 53296316
Our Reference: MCU24/0032 & OPW24/0032
Your Reference: 0572
2 July 2024
R Palazzesi
C/- Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd
3/93 Hilton Tce
TEWANTIN QLD 4565
[email protected]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Decision Notice
Planning Act 2016
I refer to your application and advise that on 25 June 2024, Council decided to refuse the
application.
Details of the decision are as follows:
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
Application No: MCU24/0032 & OPW24/0032
Street address: 38 Mossman Ct Noosa Heads Qld 4567
Real property description: Lot 145 N 21859
Planning Scheme: Noosa Plan 2020 (25 September 2020)
2. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT
The application sought the following type of development approval:
• Material Change of Use - Dwelling house
• Operational Works – Earthworks and Frontage Works
3. REASONS FOR REFUSAL
Council decided to refuse the application for the following reasons:
1. The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcome 6.3.1.2 (2)(c) of the Low Density
Residential Zone Code given the development would not maintain the low scale character of
the zone, given the cumulative impacts of non-compliant height, site cover and setback
encroachments proposed.
2. The proposal does not comply with Acceptable Outcome AO7.1 and corresponding
Performance Outcome PO7 of the Low Density Residential Zone Code as the proposal:
a. at 8.3m, presents a building height inconsistent with structures on adjoining and
surrounding premises, and with the predominant character of the area.
PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 1 of 3
Document Set ID: 23077366
Version: 4, Version Date: 02/07/2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
b. does not respond to the existing site conditions and will visually dominate the street
and surrounding area.
3. The proposal does not comply with Acceptable Outcome AO8.1 and corresponding
Performance Outcome PO8 of the Low Density Residential Zone Code as:
a. The proposal will result in a site cover of the development to 51% on the ground floor
and 38% on the first floor, well in excess of the requirements of the planning scheme.
b. The proposed building bulk is incompatible with surrounding development and the
particular circumstances of the site, noting that existing development in proximity
predominantly complies with the current site cover requirement or achieves a site cover
of an average of 40% for each storey.
c. The proposal does not achieve the 20% soft landscaping requirement, and the
structures at the basement level impacts upon the opportunity for meaningful
vegetation to screen or soften the appearance of the proposed building.
d. The proposed building bulk will be visible and prominent to Mossman Court,
surrounding development and from the waterway.
4. The proposal does not comply with Acceptable Outcome AO9.1 and AO9.2 and
corresponding Performance Outcome PO9 of the Low Density Residential Zone Code as:
a. The proposed building is not designed and sited in a manner consistent with the
predominant character of the streetscape and will impact upon on the amenity of the
streetscape and adjoining parcels due to the proposed setback encroachments.
b. The laundry, being located within the side setback clearance, reduces solar access to
the clothes drying area of the adjoining parcel to the east and does not provide
adequate distance from this area.
c. The proposed balcony and roof within the front setback will have a finished height of
7.3 metres and cause the building to dominate the street.
5. The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcome 9.3.1.2 (2)(b) of the Low Density
Housing Code as the proposed bulk and scale of the dwelling is not sited or designed to
protect the amenity of neighbouring premises.
6. The proposal is unlikely to be able to comply with Acceptable Outcome AO6 and
Performance Outcome PO6 of the Low Density Housing Code as the basement within the
boundary setbacks will limit the ability to provide soft landscaping, including screening to
surrounding land uses.
4. SUBMISSIONS
Not applicable.
5. RIGHTS OF APPEAL
You are entitled to appeal against this decision. A copy of the relevant appeal provisions from the
Planning Act 2016 is attached.
6. OTHER DETAILS
If you wish to obtain more information about the decision, electronic copies are available on line at
www.noosa.qld.gov.au or at Council Offices.
Yours faithfully,
Samual Osakwe
Development Planner
Enc: Appeal Rights
Page 2 of 3
Document Set ID: 23077366
Version: 4, Version Date: 02/07/2024
Page 3
Appeal Rights
PLANNING ACT 2016 & PLANNING REGULATION 2017
Chapter 6 Dispute resolution (3) The appellant or, for an appeal to a tribunal, the registrar must,
within the service period, give a copy of the notice of appeal to –
Part 1 Appeal rights
(a) the respondent for the appeal; and
229 Appeals to tribunal or P&E Court
(b) each co-respondent for the appeal; and
(1) Schedule 1 of the Planning Act 2016 states –
(c) for an appeal about a development application under schedule
(a) Matters that may be appealed to –
1, table 1, item 1 – each principal submitter for the
(i) either a tribunal or the P&E Court; or development application; and
(ii) only a tribunal; or (d) for and appeal about a change application under schedule 1,
table 1, item 2 – each principal submitter for the change
(iii) only the P&E Court; and
application; and
(b) The person-
(e) each person who may elect to become a co-respondent for the
(i) who may appeal a matter (the appellant); and appeal, other than an eligible submitter who is not a principal
submitter in an appeal under paragraph (c) or (d); and
(ii) who is a respondent in an appeal of the matter; and
(f) for an appeal to the P&E Court – the chief executive; and
(iii) who is a co-respondent in an appeal of the matter; and
(g) for an appeal to a tribunal under another Act – any other
(iv) who may elect to be a co-respondent in an appeal of the
person who the registrar considers appropriate.
matter.
(4) The service period is –
(2) An appellant may start an appeal within the appeal period.
(a) if a submitter or advice agency started the appeal in the P&E
(3) The appeal period is –
Court – 2 business days after the appeal has started; or
(a) for an appeal by a building advisory agency – 10 business
(b) otherwise – 10 business days after the appeal is started.
days after a decision notice for the decision is given to the
agency; or (5) A notice of appeal given to a person who may elect to be a co-
respondent must state the effect of subsection (6).
(b) for an appeal against a deemed refusal – at any time after the
deemed refusal happens; or (6) A person elects to be a co-respondent by filing a notice of election,
in the approved form, within 10 business days after the notice of
(c) for an appeal against a decision of the Minister, under chapter
appeal is given to the person.
7, part 4, to register premises or to renew the registration of
premises – 20 business days after a notice us published under 231 Other appeals
section 269(3)(a) or (4); or
(1) Subject to this chapter, schedule 1 and the P&E Court Act, unless
(d) for an appeal against an infrastructure charges notice – 20 the Supreme Court decides a decision or other matter under this
business days after the infrastructure charges notice is given Act is affected by jurisdictional error, the decision or matter is non-
to the person; or appealable.
(e) for an appeal about a deemed approval of a development (2) The Judicial Review Act 1991, part 5 applies to the decision or
application for which a decision notice has not been given – matter to the extent it is affected by jurisdictional error.
30 business days after the applicant gives the deemed
(3) A person who, but for subsection (1) could have made an
approval notice to the assessment manager; or
application under the Judicial Review Act 1991 in relation to the
(f) for any other appeal – 20 business days after a notice of the decision or matter, may apply under part 4 of that Act for a
decision for the matter, including an enforcement notice, is statement of reasons in relation to the decision or matter.
given to the person.
(4) In this section –
Note – decision includes-
See the P&E Court Act for the court’s power to extend the appeal
(a) conduct engaged in for the purpose of making a decision; and
period.
(b) other conduct that relates to the making of a decision; and
(4) Each respondent and co-respondent for an appeal may be heard
in the appeal. (c) the making of a decision or failure to make a decision; and
(5) If an appeal is only about a referral agency’s response, the (d) a purported decision; and
assessment manager may apply to the tribunal or P&E Court to
(e) a deemed refusal.
withdraw from the appeal.
non-appealable, for a decision or matter, means the decision or
(6) To remove any doubt. It is declared that an appeal against an
matter-
infrastructure charges notice must not be about-
(a) is final and conclusive; and
(a) the adopted charge itself; or
(b) may not be challenged, appealed against, reviewed, quashed,
(b) for a decision about an offset or refund-
set aside or called into question in any other way under the
(i) the establishment cost of trunk infrastructure identified in Judicial Review Act 1991 or otherwise, whether by the
a LGIP; or Supreme Court, another court, a tribunal or another entity; and
(ii) the cost of infrastructure decided using the method (c) is not subject to any declaratory, injunctive or other order of
included in the local government’s charges resolution. the Supreme Court, another court, a tribunal or another entity
on any ground.
230 Notice of appeal
232 Rules of the P&E Court
(1) An appellant starts an appeal by lodging, with the registrar of the
tribunal or P&E Court, a notice of appeal that- (1) A person who is appealing to the P&E Court must comply with the
rules of the court that apply to the appeal.
(a) is in the approved form; and
(b) succinctly states the grounds of the appeal. (2) However, the P&E Court may hear and decide an appeal even if
the person has not complied with the rules of the P&E Court
(2) The notice of appeal must be accompanied by the required fee.
Page 3 of 3
Document Set ID: 23077366
Version: 4, Version Date: 02/07/2024
Used in these records
Refused Decision Notice MCU24 0032Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 171 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.